[ home ] [ art / b / c / ctw / fc / g / hobby / pol / r / sig / tard / tv / v / x / z ] [ overboard ] [ bans ] [ donate ] [ rules/info ] [ frenpill ] [ library ] [ nonfren radar ] [ frenspass ]

Catalog (/r/)

Sort by: Image size:
R: 244 / I: 111 (sticky)

Judaism General

Learning Thread for Judaism, including but not limited to Torah, Kabbalah, Bible, Quran, Zohar, Talmud, Mishnah; Sabbatean Frankism, Christianity, Satanism, Semitic Polytheism (Baal, etc.), judaic rituals…

Post explanations of Jewish belief, interesting verses from their books, rabbi clips, etc. Anything that helps understand their mysticism.

Posts about Bible and Quran should relate to jews in some way.

To start this thread I'll post these links:
>Adam Green/Know More News:
https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1
>Jewish text library
https://sefaria.org/texts
R: 24 / I: 5

Satanic Bible

Got my hands on a Satanic Bible. What am I in for? Is satanism real or not ?
R: 71 / I: 41 (sticky)

/nsg/ - National Socialism General

卐 THE GREAT NATSOC GENERAL 卐

Thread for discussion of the National Socialist Worldview, its religious practices - such as reintroducing summer and winter solstice celebrations, Positive Christianity, etc. The thread has specifically this purpose, so no discussion of Holocaust, Economy, Strategy, etc. Remember, this is /r/. This thread is about the worldview, or religion, which is National Socialism. /pol/nsg/: >>>/pol/88243

Books:
>Mein Kampf
library.frenschan.org/book/850

>The Nazi-Sozi: Questions and Answers for National-Socialists

library.frenschan.org/book/3432

>Celebrations in the Life of the SS family

library.frenschan.org/book/1722

>God and Folk

frenschan.org/book/400

>Faith and Action

library.frenschan.org/book/396

>Hitler's Priest: The Anton Holzner Collection

library.frenschan.org/book/288

>Faith and Struggle

library.frenschan.org/book/42

>Leading and Following

library.frenschan.org/book/435

>ᛋᛋ Ideology collection

library.frenschan.org/book/1720

>The Myth of the 20th Century

library.frenschan.org/book/2027

>Positive Christianity in the Third Reich

library.frenschan.org/book/1739

>The Positive German God-Belief

library.frenschan.org/book/1951

>Germany's New Religion: The Germanic Faith Movement

library.frenschan.org/book/1721

>Heinrich Himmler speech about (Homo-)Sexuality

library.frenschan.org/book/943

>You and your Folk

library.frenschan.org/book/1340

>"The ᛋᛋ Warrior Poet" - collected writings by Kurt Eggers

library.frenschan.org/book/426

Speeches by important NS figures:
>The Impartial Truth
argentbeacon.com/films/the-impartial-truth/

>Alerta Judiada

argentbeacon.com/films/alerta-judiada/

>Historia Prohibida

archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Historia+Prohibida%22

>Magister Populi

archive.org/search?query=creator%3A%22Magister+Populi%22

General Archive:
>NSL Archiv
archive.org/download/nslarchiv_201910

>Hyperborean

hyperborean.net/media

it would not let me post with hotlinks, sorry fellas.
R: 14 / I: 2

Have you ever enountered the gods?

I was wondering if anyone here has ever spoken to, been spoken to, seen, or received signs from the gods?

If so what happened?
R: 51 / I: 21

/r/ Humor Thread

A thread for cozy bants and miscellaneous memes, because I had nowhere else to post picrel.
It's real, all I did was photoshopping the screenshot of the thumbnail on top of the screenshot with the title
R: 95 / I: 58

Sikhi is a Proto-Aryan Religion, not solely an Indric Phonemonon

Guru Nanak Dev Ji- Established the doctrine in praise of the Truth, the universal, all encompassing, formless Lord.
Guru Gobind Singh Ji- Did Battle with and Defeated the Mohommadons. His lineage were martial warrior saints.

The fact of the matter is, just as many practice Semitic, tantric, or Pagan religion from far away, so to is my Sikhi from the Punjab.

Sikhi is a universal scholarly pursuit to Truth. Find the Truth, no matter thy religion, no matter thy pursuit, do battle with deceit.
That is how the Christians and Muslims and Atheists can all work together to bring National Socialism home. HITLER WAS NOT OPPOSED TO ANY RELIGION, UNLESS IT WAS FAR TOO FOREIGN, OR WAS AN ATTEMPT TO HARM THR STATE.
Sikhi is the most compatible with western values, and in a sense is a Faustian Buddhism, but the Lord of Reality, the True, is our mephistopheles.
R: 28 / I: 3

Metareligion

The following "religions" all recognize the potential validity of experience (and scripture) originating from other traditions:
>[Neo]Animism
>Daoism
>[Neo]Gnosticism
>Neoplatonism
>Vedism

If we restrict ourselves to European tradition we're left with Animism and Neoplatonism. These two seem like a logical place to investigate for a theological and ancestral foundation

We can and should ultimately be able to attain unity amidst our diversity through both logic and direct experience
R: 1 / I: 0

Explaining The Bible

The jews are the butt of the joke. It comes down to ethical satire.
R: 65 / I: 16

(Japanese) "ancestor worship" makes most sense to me.

And I don't see any downsides to making it at least the main focus of any religion, if you feel you need a religion.

1)Its based on True Facts, not hokey made up stories from con-artists and child molesters. The True Facts its based on are pretty awe inspiring, not matter how young and impressionable or old and world weary you might be…that you are the real (so far) final product of millions of ancestors over millions of years and if not for each one of them you wouldn't even exist, etc.

Its selfish, but in TWO good ways. On one hand you got at least the feeling that you got countless ancestors pressuring you to be worthy, as well as you feeling you should yourself be worthy of "worship" by YOUR offspring (which also means you should have offspring themselves worthy of re-production.

Seems immune to Jewish tricks and promotes healthy ethnically pure nuclear families, extended families, communities and nations.

On one hand it tends to promote ethnic purity, but also its completely inclusive and has no need for any priest class or payments to any big organizations.

I've noticed everything Jews do and promote is against Ancestor Worship, and that includes Abraham For Goyim (Jesus and Islam) and you should always do opposite of what Jews are pushing.

PS-This is in no way a shill for Jap culture, just that Ancestor Worship seems the only real "religion" that isn't a cheap con-job.
R: 82 / I: 26

The Origins of Christianity

Full theory: https://www.christcuck.org/

Christianity has been a cancer on this planet and this single jew ideology has brought incalculable destruction, but particularly to Europe and Europeans, so this should be the foremost topic of discussion on the right.

My theory: I believe that Christianity can be traced to the Alexandrian School (proto-Frankfurt School) in Egypt, between 40CE and 50CE.

-The Alexandrian School was in the business of creating syncretic slave-making religions (Serapis cult, the Sibylline Oracles describes how they did it, etc.)
-The New Testament Epistles were written in Jewish Koine Greek (a language specific to jews in Alexandria)
-The New Testament Epistles can be traced to Philo of Alexandria through textual analyses and stylometry
-Context: Alexandrian Riots (38CE) and Philo's embassy to Rome (40CE)
-Alexandrian figures and mythologies show up in the bible: Roman governor of Egypt Aulus Avilius Flaccus fits the character of Pontius Pilate, the Egyptian story Tale of Shipwrecked Sailor was plagiarized for the biography of Paul the Apostle, Egyptian deity Horus was plagiarized for jesus, etc.

The Alexandrian School was in the business of creating syncretic psy-op religions, and after the Alexandrian Riots they took the Divine Julius cult (the religion the Romans were most familiar with), infused a slave-morality into it, and a jewish character to replace Julius Caesar to subconsciously connect the Romans to jews.

If you scratch the surface of the biblical narrative there is an extremely powerful divide and conquer slave morality system at the core of christianity, and this system didn't just come out of midrash's. Between the Serapis cult and christianity the Alexandrian jews had 300 years to perfect their slave-making morality.

What do you think of this theory?
R: 76 / I: 9

Esoteric Hiterlism as a religon

Could a new religion come into being out of existing esoteric "hitlerist" writings like the works of Serrano, Evola and co.? It would be restricted to white people, of course. But what would be the commandments, rituals, doctrine ect. in this religion? Would there be a priesthood or a holy text, for instance?
R: 81 / I: 18
I miss him bros…any chance he will ever come back to twatter?
R: 18 / I: 11

The Pagan Lifestyle

Since the '1483 Lifestyle' laid out in >>>/c/8161 is fake and gay, I felt it appropriate to show an alternative, the Pagan lifestyle. I can already hear you exclaim: "That word is a jewish slur for our kind!", and you'd be right, my friend. But no insult directed towards us can ever truly be one, can it? Call us Pagans, it does not bother us, for yes, we reject the jewish will to power and we are proud of that! Call us Nazis, for yes, we love our people and take pride in that! Call us White devils, for yes we are Aryan and our history is a march of titans. And being Aryan, that's what this all really boils down to. Paganism, Nazism, it's all downstream from our race, a conceptualization with this I mean the opposite of a manifestation, I.e. a spiritual manifestation of a physical reality of our biospirit. That being said:

The Aryan Lifestyle

The term Aryan is more than simply what we are, it's an ideal. Don't misinterpret, however. Our Aryanization is not a process of transformation, but one of purification. Centuries of semitic contaminants, both physical and spiritual, have decalibrated us from our true being. We are covered in the products of psychological warfare, having forgotten our true selves. We cannot even tell our true selves apart from the added filth we have allowed to pour into us. We are not the highest form of men to have ever existed, but we're still high enough to eventually reach that - over generations, mind you. It is the Aryan way that we shall become noblemen I am referring to the concept of the Herrenmensch here, not historical aristocracy and work towards the coming man - the superman. Overman is the term more commonly used to avoid associations with jewish superheroes but in the world I see that term will not evoke such associations So first we shall find out what is true to us, what we natively possess and strip off the shackles put on us by counternatural adversaries.

>Nature

Jewish religions like judaism and christianity are and have always been in opposition to nature, regarding it as savage and evil. The same is not true for Paganism. Our ancestors lived in harmony with nature and saw the godly in it. A proper term for Paganism is natural religion. So embrace nature! Hike in the woods, climb a mountain, or even just take a walk in the park! Let your feet touch soil. Be awake when it's light, go to sleep when it's dark. Abide by the laws of nature. >>>5684


>Strength, Beauty, Truth

All three of these things should be pursued. Goodness is often placed instead of Strength, but good is what derives from strength.

>Strength

This applies to your mind as well as your body. Do not avoid pain and suffering. Your brain adjusts to pain and pleasure, meaning pain avoidance is also future avoidance of joy and it will lead nowhere. Don't be an escapist bitch and face whatever is bothering you head-on. No matter how hard things may be, stay with the pain and down shut it out. Live in the present moment. You should also strive towards having a strong body by putting it through reasonable amount of stressed. Whether those come in form of exercises in a gymnasium, martial arts training or another activity of your choosing is irrelevant. What matters is you do it. This will also make your body appear more aesthetic, which leads to the next aspect:

>Beauty

Achieve an aesthetic physique and maintain it. Physical exercise and a proper diet will aid you in this. Dress properly. Be properly groomed. Maintain a good posture anytime.

>Truth

Reject falsehood and speak the truth. The modern world will force absurdities onto you. Reject them. Those who seek to overcome nature by changing their gender will fail. They are what they are born as. Do not give them the satisfaction of acknowledging their imagined victory over nature. They sold their soul.


>The World

Do not reject the world, for just like the buildings around us, the animals, the trees, the rocks, the air we breathe and the ground we stand on - we are of this world. Yes, even those who use that phrase as an insult for us treif ones, are of the world. Why would we be less part of the planet than all the other things on it? Our sentience? I digress, the anti-world attitude is a jewish psyop they implanted in christianity but is absent in judaism, which instead is no more than a script for world domination. Do not reject that which is blatantly real for a promise of an afterlife. Embrace life, embrace the world. Have children. Be healthy. Do not reject the world, do not reject your body. Those who eat immoderately, dress improperly, and use only about one-third of their lung capacity can never have the physical efficiency necessary for the fullest expression of the higher Life.

>Death

Fear of death, as in the inevitable passing of one's body, rather than as an immediate threat, is a negative byproduct of evolutionary individualism. I'm not here to reject the concept of the individual in its entirety, because like other illusions such as time, it has its benefits and we have evolved this perception for a reason. What is important however, is that we realize it is just that, an illusion. Do not fear death, for as long as your genes live, you live. Like an immune cell, ready to sacrifice its individual life for the greater organism which is your body, you too belong to a greater organism, which is your nation or race. Do not believe in semitic lies of an individual afterlife, there is no 'after'life, there is only life and total death isn't truly real if your nation survives. Theoretically billions of people could arise from just 4 human cells. Think about that. It's just one giant organism. I'll leave it at that, if anyone wants to dispute my claims I'm open to debate them further down in the thread.

>Arrogance

False preachers would tell you about the grandeur of false virtues such as humility. Fall for no such tricks. Humility was invented by the weak to avoid feelings of inferiority. Do not be afraid to admit superiority when it is with you. Don't downplay your achievements and abilities. You're a masterful painter in a group and someone asks who the best painter is? Raise your arm. Or are you afraid to be proven wrong of what you deem to be the truth? You'd rather hide in the off-chance you aren't as good as you thought? Or are you afraid to upset the mediocrity of your peers? Want them to exclaim you are the best so they don't feel looked down upon? Admit it, humility is not noble, it is cowardice disguised as a virtue. Cowardice is not Aryan.

>Guilt, shame & regret

Do not be fooled into feeling guilt or shame for your past actions. You chose to take them with full intent, you exercised your will by taking those actions. It was the decision you made so there's nothing to regret. You decided it was the right move to make and that's the end of it. You think you may have acted in a suboptimal manner? Learn from it and move on. Don't obsess over it.


It is impossible that I haven't left something out, for to not write an entire book I intentionally kept things at a surface level and I almost definitely even forgot things. I would be glad if you, the reader, expanded on my writings, or even, if you disagree with them to challenge them, unlike the people of a certain other thread I would attempt to properly engage with the arguments. Thank you for reading. Also check out >>>/pol/114105 slightly similar to this thread ig. Also

https://frenschan.org/r/catalog.html
http://u2ljln34n55et3xp2wiewybvwr74p4rmcsf2zrravtqj3turtbyjd4id.onion/r/catalog.html
>>>/sig/7626

idek if I even wrote anything coherent I just spitballed and I'm too tired to really go through the text tbh
R: 57 / I: 22

The Man to Come Approaches / A New Racial Avatar

The Man to Come is, indeed, likely already incarnate. One may feel it in the air and in the growing awareness of the People. A new Racial Avatar approaches, just as Hitler once did. It could be in any European population or European founded country - best case scenario is in one of the most powerful, such as America. But it is most likely that He is already incarnate and walks among us. He will be different, this time, as it is with every incarnation of Our Avatar, and He will not know what He is or what He is destined to do - just as it was for Hitler.

It is similar to Savitri Devi's belief that Hitler was an incarnation of Vishnu - though a little different. I admit that her works were inspirational to me in coming to understand the repeating nature of Racial Avatars in the European subspecies of human. I suspect it happens for other races as well - there are MENAs and Asians who have such figures in their history as well - but none have one so world shatteringly potent as our last one, Hitler, was.

You could even know the Avatar personally, just not aware of who He is yet. If you do, however, then just as many reported with Hitler you will likely feel a sense of peace and "rightness" when around or interacting with Him. This is just as the common average person felt when in the presence of the last Avatar. He will not be aware of these feelings in others, or have any knowledge it is happening in the first place - at least until His ascension to a fully aware Avatar (something that never got to happen last time).
R: 13 / I: 2
The great Aryan awakening.

The symbol of our race and movement is the Yule (the six spoke wheel)

Here is more info.

Newest english translation of the oera linda book
https://oeralinda.nl/

The audio reading of the Aryan Scriptures
https://youtu.be/kdPjnVunTQw

Three videos dealing with a introduction to the Aryan Scriptures

https://youtu.be/rYT_WugMLoY

https://youtu.be/XujB_NhKTy4

https://youtu.be/gvt5jJnMruc

Here is a link dealing with our origin and evidence
https://aryanscriptures.wordpress.com/the-hymn-of-our-origin-chapter-1/

And a prayer for all Aryans
https://youtube.com/shorts/zElBN5p1yHI?feature=share

Wear the symbol proudly.
R: 273 / I: 247

Odins Ahnenerbe

Highest Good: Aryan Blood!

The Ahnenerbe (German: ancestral heritage) operated in National Socialist Germany between 1935 and 1945. Heinrich Himmler, the Reichsführer-SS, established it as an SS appendage devoted to the task of promoting the idea that the modern Germans (and the white people in general) descended from an ancient Aryan race. The group comprised scholars and scientists from a broad range of academic disciplines.
R: 21 / I: 10

Origin of the Jewish Death Cult

Knowledge of where the jews and their religion came from has been heavily redacted, the library of Alexandria burned, the hidden Vatican trove etc. What are they hiding? Well um, donkey demon death god, in the ancient world it was well known Set-Typhon was another name for Yahweh, and furthermore that this God was evil. Set originally a component of Egyptian syncretism, the God of foreigners and violence ie. Canaanite proto-jews, given a place in the Egyptian Pantheon, then co-opted by the jews themselves as they stealthily crept their way into power with the mostly bloodless Hyksos invasion, placing their capital in Avaris, the center of Sets power, and establishing a kingdom of bloody sacrifice and tyranny. They had zero problem with worshipping Set as they knew it was an alternate designation for their own God.

>The notion of the evil (Judean) creator had existed for centuries in native Egyptian revisionary mythology. The notion was thus already prepared for its early Christian application to the Judeo-catholic creator. Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans identified the evil god Seth-Typhon (often depicted as a donkey-like creature) with the Jewish god Yahweh. The Seth-Yahweh tradition, with all its negative valence, was then applied to the creator worshiped by Christians as well. Evidence for this view comes from the early Christian depiction of the creator and his sons in donkey (Typhonian) form. In addition to material culture (gems, amulets, and graffiti), four texts are analyzed in this chapter: The Birth of Mary, the Secret Book of John, the so-called Ophite diagram, and the Phibionites described by Epiphanius.


(The Evil Creator: Origins of an Early Christian Idea)
https://libgen.li/ads.php?md5=0bc8a3f542322d177d53e1756487869d

Manetho's well worth a read, turns the Exodus story on its head, a far more truthful version because its not written by lying hebes. Rather than escaping the jews were forcibly ejected (Hyksos) from Egypt, later a second bunch of these deviants that apparently included a large proportion of lepers were sent out the same way, these fine specimens combined to found Jerusalem, kek.

"there came up from the East, in a strange manner, men of an ignoble race, who had the confidence to invade our country, and easily subdued it by their power, without a battle. ‘And, when they had our rulers in their hands, they burnt our cities, and demolished the temples of the gods, and inflicted every kind of barbarity upon the inhabitants, slaying some, and reducing the wives and children of others to a state of slavery."

>Also, Manetho's Aegyptiaca (quoted in part by Josephus) written about 270 BC, connects the Jews in general and Moses in particular with the Egyptian god Seth. He tells us the Hyksos (shephards) withdrew from Egypt, wandered in the desert, and finally settled in Judea where they founded the city of Jerusalem (Against Apion I:75-90). The Hyksos are elsewhere described as worshipers of Seth.


https://www.jasoncolavito.com/manetho.html

>During the rule of the Hyksos invaders (c. 1630–1521 BCE), Seth was worshipped at their capital, Avaris, in the northeastern Nile River delta, and was identified with the Canaanite storm god Baal.


https://www.britannica.com/topic/Seth-Egyptian-god

Donkey worship has its own term, onolatry, which is weird but reflects how often the charge was laid against them, other animals come under zoolatry, generally pretty much everything negative said about kikelstein proves correct, this is no different.

"Onolatry is the supposed worship of the donkey. In Imperial Rome, the charge of onolatry was used to taunt the Jews and first Christians. The association of Jews with donkeys was a common feature of Hellenic as well as Latin ethnographic and historical writings, and included accusations of worshipping a golden donkey head and even sacrificing foreigners to it at intervals. A famous example of this is the Alexamenos graffito. The charge was likely first used against Jews in Egypt, where donkeys were at some points associated with Set."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Onolatry

>Historian. [He wrote] Tactics in 2 books, [and] On the Jews; in which [latter] he says that they bowed down to the golden head of an ass and every seven years hunted a stranger and attacked him and tore his flesh into thin strips and thus killed him."

(Damocritus, Suda, Delta #49)

“it was in order to the fulfilling a law of the Jews, which they must not tell him, that he was thus fed; and that they did the same at a set time every year: that they used to catch a Greek foreigner, and fat him thus up every year, and then lead him to a certain wood, and kill him, and sacrifice with their accustomed solemnities, and taste of his entrails, and take an oath upon this sacrificing a Greek, that they would ever be at enmity with the Greeks; and that then they threw the remaining parts of the miserable wretch into a certain pit."
(Apion, as quoted by Flavius Josephus, Against Apion, book 2, ch8)

"Flavius Josephus reports that the history recounted by Apione was not invented by him, but was, rather, derived from other Greek writers, an indication that its dissemination must have been much more widespread than we are led to imagine"
(Blood Passover, Ariel Toaff)

https://archive.org/details/blood-passover-the-jews-of-europe-and-ritual-murder-by-ariel-toaff-z-lib.org

>Nothing, however, distressed them so much as the scarcity of water, and they had sunk ready to perish in all directions over the plain, when a herd of wild asses was seen to retire from their pasture to a rock shaded by trees. Moyses followed them, and, guided by the appearance of a grassy spot, discovered an abundant spring of water. This furnished relief. After a continuous journey for six days, on the seventh they possessed themselves of a country, from which they expelled the inhabitants, and in which they founded a city and a temple. […] In their holy place they have consecrated an image of the animal by whose guidance they found deliverance from their long and thirsty wanderings." (Tacitus, Histories V:3-4)


"The Jews are a race that hate the gods and mankind. Their laws are in opposition to those of all mortals. They despise what to us is holy. Their laws condone them in committing acts which horrify us." (Tacticus, Historian V. 3-8)

Further there is a Law concerning the slaughter of foreigners, who are the same as beasts. This slaughter is to be carried out in a lawfully valid manner. The ones who do not follow the Jewish religious law have to be offered to God as a sacrifice.
(Thikunne Sohar, Berdiwetsch 88b)

https://archive.org/details/pdfy-AmmQI75Drf0O2onX

An incident occurred, and the boy lived with his father’s heirs, and they slaughtered him on the eve of Passover. (Talmud, Ketubot 102b)

https://www.sefaria.org/Ketubot.102b

>But I should think that if the Jews had such an antipathy against a hog, they would kill it as the magicians do mice; when, on the contrary, they are by their religion as much prohibited to kill as to eat it. And perhaps there may be some reason given for this; for as the ass is worshipped by them as the first discoverer of fountains. (Plutarch, Quæstiones Conviviales 4.5.2)


"Those who say that Typhon fled from the battle on an ass for seven days, and having been saved produced sons, Hierosolymus and Judeaus, are at this point clearly dragging Jewish issues into the story." (Plutarch, De Iside et Osiride 363C-D)

https://www.philipharland.com/Blog/2022/06/judeans-poseidonios-apollonios-molon-diodoros-and-apion-on-human-sacrifice-and-donkey-worship-first-centuries-bce-and-ce/

Although it's somewhat rare, to this day jews have a mitzvah for donkeys, symbollically treating them much like their own mini kikes.

>And every firstling of an ass thou shalt redeem with a lamb; and if thou wilt not redeem it, then thou shalt break his neck: and all the firstborn of man among thy children shalt thou redeem. (Exodus 13:13)


>God’s name ho ōn (Exod 3:14), and its subsequent association with the Greek word ho onos (“the ass”), stands as a source for accusing Jews of onolatry.


1/5
R: 0 / I: 0

I'd like to say a prayer for my frens

I got some Easter-candy early. I had this idea to do lent by cutting off the goy-syrup of caffeine but that didn't pan out lol. But that's ok. I'm not Catholic anyway. I just thought it'd be a cute idea to escalate the force behind my will.

The prayer I wish to speak is one of I'm actually enjoying this candy. This is what separates the living God from the devil. If ya read Screwtape Letters, it's all laid out. The demonic cannot grant you anything, it can only take or dissapoint. An addiction never even starts from a place of enjoyment. It starts from facades, from spite, from persistance in false narratives. I enjoy coffee too and it's not for the caffeine. One or two cups of coffee and I'm good for the day. But energy drinks? Never enough. Because there's no love in it, no passion, not beauty. It's factory made anti-freeze, souless, all it can grant is a temporary boost to my just as empty engine of a body to get me through the grueling day. Let us pray together that during Easter we all rise from the dead as Christ. No longer confided to our mortal coils, our shitty little jobs, our boomer families, our past mistakes. All these things are just nails driven into our hands on our own crosses. Convincing us that there is no escape, that somehow we deserve all of this, we do not. Never did. Any blood or tears or silent regret that needed to spill, was more than spilled enough on that one and only cross. And when we ressurect from our own chambers, let us awaken to a world which we want to be in. You can call it dimension shifting, you can call it law of attraction, you can call it whatever you want. I choose to simply call it prayer.
https://youtu.be/xqooC4ZG75Y?si=j8Wvs8gli9CYiylh
R: 4 / I: 0

i need to know

was the forehead and wrist tempersture scanner one of the marks of the beast before the vax and those who got scanned what happens now?
R: 19 / I: 6

Esoteric Hitlerism retroactively refuted by Hitler

"I especially wouldn't want our movement to acquire a
religious character and institute a form of worship. It would be
appalling for me, and I would wish I'd never lived, if I were to
end up in the skin of a Buddha!" - Adolf Hitler (Table Talk, compl. Martin Bormann, p. 61)

It is in vogue to deny the authenticity of Table Talk, always due to the religious sensibilities it hurts. Christians deny it because in it Hitler condemns Christianity. Esoteric Hitlerists would like to use it for this reason, but it retroactively refutes the entire premise of their religion.
R: 2 / I: 0

What brought you here?

Tell your story and how your free will lead to here, frenschan.
R: 17 / I: 5

Neo-Pagan Christian Nazism

The religious divide is caused by a misunderstanding of the purpose of religion. All of religion is based on the primordial religion, the exculta hominem vitae, or human civilization. There is a reason why Jews, Christians and Muslims are considered "nations" and they even have laws regulating marriage and thus genetic lineage. Civilization is an inheritance. There is no Christianity or Paganism without the totality of Western civilization.

The natural conclusion of Paganism (Old Western civilization) was its evolution into Christendom (Middle Western Civilization). Monotheism is scientifically provable, but polytheism is a lousy excuse for White genocide. The natural conclusion of Christianity, was the Pagan Renaissance and the reconciliation of Christian and Pagan values against White Genocide and Jewish subversion in Europe. The ultimate manifestation and the natural evolution and reconciliation of Christianity and Paganism was Adolf Hitler and National Socialism (Modern Western Civilization, before Jewish occupation, less than 80 years ago).
>TO THE CHRISTIANS: Paganism built Rome, and it is the foundation of your evolved religion. There would be no Christianity without the triumph of Paganism over Semitism, and without the abundant malevolence and indignity of Semitism.
>TO THE PAGANS: Christianity is undeniably Pagan, and the Bible offers us insight into the tribe of Judah and their own philosophy. Keep your frens (White Christians) close and your enemies (Christian Zionists) closer.

Within this great lineage of Western civilization, including Paganism, Christianity, the Renaissance, and National Socialism lies every answer to every question you could ever ask. We are already the perfect culture, and have already proven it in the past, but our people have amnesia and our lands are occupied by foreigners who fight like cowards using the dirtiest tricks. White men should be taught to love everything Western and hate everything alien, as Jews know already to hate everything Gentile and protect everything Jewish, no matter their personal opinion of it.

Zionism, Communism, Free Market Capitalism, all have taken on more of a religious essence these days. The Holocaust myth is embedded into Judaism, as are their previous wars, like the Roman-Jewish war and the Maccabean revolt. The primary areas where Zionists meet to discuss their plans are in synagogues. Communists have similarly pretended to be social justice movements. While they carry out quiet Communist genocides through depopulation and demographic displacement of Whites in our native lands, they pretend they are fighting social injustice by fighting racism. Free Market Capitalism has all of Hollywood and it's profits on their side. Most of America congregates in theaters to watch Hollywood on average once a week (every Sunday, perhaps? maybe on the Sabbath?). It is undeniable, they operate covertly like religions.

A religion is like a "break away civilization" or a civilization within a civilization. The aforementioned religions in particular, exist to destroy the host nation which they occupy. You need a religion for the working class, and a religion for the educated class. From Jews, the working class are given the religion called Communism. Their religion teaches them to massacre the upper class, and be in perpetual revolt until their host nations are weak enough to be conquered. The educated class are given Free Market Capitalism, which is exploited by Jewish blackmail, corruption, and usury. The third class called Zionism is the deification of Jewish nationalism practicing "Jews are god's chosen master race", "Might is right" and "Do what thou wilt" as their core beliefs. The third class is necessary because the Jews intend to rule over people who are not their kin, so they must separate to remain pure. This is also a racial & social caste system, where the Communists are often poor and non-White, the Free Market Capitalists usually educated Whites, and the Zionists are obviously Jews, who can be found as leaders of both Communism and Capitalism too.
R: 5 / I: 3

Questions about God's presence

It's been very confusing during this past year starting to question Christianity, everything else, and then winding up on these kind of sites, but the one thing has somewhat grounded me is God's presence
if any of you know about Meister Eckhart or other Christian mystics then you understand, but if not it's like this


>meditate, focus on emptying yourself of all created things

>in the act of being filled with nothing you become more sensitive to spiritual things and spiritually commune with God (for me it's a very comforting and transcendent presence)

So what should I do about this? I still have questions about Christianity and came close to rejecting it before but the genuine spiritual experiences I've had make that complicated. Should I just keep praying to this presence I can commune with? Study a non Abrahamic religion? Or stick with Christianity and keep communing with this presence that is supposedly the Christian God?
R: 14 / I: 1

.:::My spiritual Experience:. Thinking Beyond Religion:::.

There is no heaven or hell, there is only one cold harbor-like place where the atmosphere is blue and the spirits live off of the living. I mean. Perhaps.
In the spiritual world, the distorted sense of saving you is harming you, because it is through pity that you can be saved. In other words, passing the blame among other puns. This is not limited to religion, if religion in the living world is better than the afterlife just because it is easy to follow something and the only reason you complain it's because you age.
They are not trying to solve a problem. They are creating one. But they admit that you were already fine. If you unravel their nature and put the pieces together, you will see. The way to save yourself is to do others. Part and parcel of what comes from behind the barrier.
The Death uses the living to sustain themselves. And they can't sleep otherwise they die. There is no music and there can't be much thought by yourself, otherwise, something happens, which I don't know that part. Perhaps because they affect the living.
Still believing you'll see your loved ones after death?
It is similar to Buddhism: “In Buddhism, the concept of destiny or destiny is called niyati. Niyati refers to predetermined, inevitable, and unalterable events. In some religious traditions in India, such as the Vedanta school of Hinduism, an external or divine power or an external agency is seen as capable of influencing one's destiny.”
One thing is for sure “I didn’t ask for this” should become a popular phrase if you suffer such events. Laugh at the face of destiny because it's not yours.
Having forced thoughts is a sign. But it's not a good sign.
It's like one of those Seers. Unfortunately, Seers have no idea how deceived they are being deceived. However, as a matter of irony, Catholics don't seem to like Seers very much if you are an old-school Catholic.
The worst part is when the entity tries to read your name and they insist. It's as if a sequence needs to be completed otherwise nothing is predictable for them.
Whoever is behind the future of humanity and influences this way I say, we are screwed.
Spirituality ruined my life and they did it on purpose to ruin you. I'm not talking about religion. I'm talking beyond religion. There is a reason why Jews want to end God and I agree with them the more I think about it. But if they want to end God, then it's not just God they want to end.
I'm sorry, but good and evil are not my cake. It's disgusting how they do things because that's what they are. Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I conclude that religion isn't much different from politics either. Some say it is cause and effect, I say it is an insult to the injury caused. Nietzsche is then the next fruit. Like how “not to fix what isn’t broken.”
Sound scary? Good. You're about to witness this crap when you die if you can remember these words. Printscreen for reference.
Otherwise, I wouldn't be visited by one of their shenanigans to say this. They force you to have thoughts that perhaps you would say and then try indirectly approach with other end-results that otherwise don't mean it will get there, but as said they need predictability.
Call me a schizo if you want, but the brain isn't that complex. Not all diseases are natural and I saw things I shouldn't but were presented anyway.
It's ironic. It's not religion on a second thought that it's the joke, it's what lies beyond that is the joke.
The cases of people hearing voices and whatnot has increased and I fear whoever is behind it lost his shit.
R: 159 / I: 95

The Lounge - let's revitalize /r/!

Time to boost our traffic. Drop a post in this thread every time you visit /r/, whether it be memes, discussions, personal ideas, blogposts, or anything.
R: 5 / I: 0

Esoteric Hitlerism

What is this artwork trying to convey? What is Esoteric Hitlerism? Who are the Aryans and how are they connected to the Germans? What should one know about Indian religious texts? What are the secrets taught in this belief system? How does one carry on its practices to enhance their power? How does one properly meditate?

In fewer words, RepPill me on Esoteric Hitlerism / Nazism
R: 41 / I: 6

The switch from polytheism to monotheism

Does anyone have any insight into this? Why did it happen?
As far as I know, the entire world originally practiced polytheism.
Was it theological? Does the idea of multiple supernatural entities ocassionally at odds with each other strike people as absurd? Was it political? Did the ruling powers decide that it would be easier to manage their populaces if they all believed in the same god? Most importantly, was the slide from polytheism to monotheism actually the first step towards atheism?
In popular culture, Jews are commonly credited with the origin of monotheism, but it appears the first attempt at it was the Egyptian Pharaoh Akhenaten, who attempted to enforce a monotheistic sun god religion (this is actually where the Jews likely got the idea from). After Akhenaten died the Egyptians quickly returned back to polytheism though so it didn't last, but in the middle east and Europe, monotheism eventually won.
R: 7 / I: 0

Praying before eating

I don't know about you but some of the people i've known have done 5 minute prayers at the dinner table. I was randomly thinking about it just now, it's not something i ever think about. Do prayers before eating really need to be that long? It feels narcissistic to make the whole table wait on you while you do such a long prayer. Thoughts?
R: 23 / I: 14
I was asked by >>>/pol/70197 to elaborate on picrel, but decided to just make a dedicated thread.

I'll elaborate a bit on the concept of the traditional European calendar(s), since I don't follow exactly the one in picrel (made by "Norse Magic and Beliefs"). I am not a super-autistic recreationist, but I have spent a lot of time studying the broader worldview of my ancestors. It is from this perspective that I talk of calendars. Note that I have not run calculations many years into the future to see if this breaks down - it very well might, but the calendar would just be adjusted accordingly at such a time if necessary.

"My" Germanic calendar is a Luni-Solar calendar, meaning that a month goes from New Moon to New Moon. This is what the word month means, and it where the concept comes from. We run into some difficulties compared to our fixed calendar, since the (lunar) months aren't fixed and end up "sliding" around the year a bit, and there are occasionally thirteen moons in a year. In that case, we add in a month in late summer (we know for a fact the Romans did this, but we can't say for sure what the Germanics did in, say, the Bronze Age). If using the even older names for the months (those used by Solheim in his work), this so happens to coincide with Odin's month of Glaðsheimr. Odin is known for being a mysterious wanderer, so it is reasonable to assume that it is his month that comes and goes and the twelve others that remain more constant.
Four points of the year are determined by the sun: the Solstices and Equinoxes. I'm sure you're familiar. The moon (New or Full, depending) after a Solstice or Equinox is usually indicative of a seasonal change or midwinter/midsummer event, and is associated with festivities and special rites.
The whole year is one big religious super-reincarnation ritual, ranging from reincarnating Baldr (a concept equivalent to Persephone's part-time marriage to Hades which you might be more familiar with) so that we may have a summer, to reincarnating ancestral spirits (elves, nisser, etc.). There's about 40 days of Yuletide (calling the ancestors back), 40 days of fasting (the ancestors are without "food") before Easter and 40 days between Easter (resurrection of Baldr; and fertilization of the egg) and Siegblut (birth)[1]. 40 days are symbolically the 40 weeks of a pregnancy, and the triple repetition is equivalent to the three trimesters.

>Why does the calendar stretch over both 2022 and 2023?

Germanic New Year starts, according to both Vegard, Vikernes and NMAB, shortly after the Autumn Equinox around Halloween. The Roman New Year started after the Spring Equinox. Placing New Year in the middle of the cold season is neither logical, historical nor spiritual. Thus, a Germanic or a Roman year will always overlap two Gregorian or Julian years, running roughly from September/October to September/October (or March/April to March/April for Romans).

>more resources

https://www.odelsarven.com/single-post/the-original-calendar
Linked is Vegard Solheim's intro post, but he's got tons more blogposts on the calendar. He's the author of picrel here >>>/pol/69066

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYR5MTIVNXY
Linked is NMAB's the explanation for the specific calendar in picrel, by the creator. He's got tons more videos on the calendar.

Note that these two and myself all disagree slightly. Solheim promotes a fixed calendar like ours, but with 13 months of 28 days plus some intercalary days around the New Year. He has the months as the abodes of the gods, and the middle of the month is the day of that god (which according to his interpretation was always a friday the 13th). NMAB promotes a luni-solar one with the month starting on the Full Moon (which he admits is his own inference from a line by Tacitus that may or may not be historically accurate), and uses names for the months known from later Germanic calendars. As a result, he needs to be able to insert a thirteenth month once in a while. I lean towards the NMAB one, but using the gods' abodes as month names but with the month starting on the New Moon and the Full Moon marking the given god's "birthday".

If there's an interest in this thread, we can go through the next few events step by step and discuss the various rites and festivities. According to my estimates, we are currently in the month Woodland (Landvidi), belonging to Vidar, Odinsson and Fenrisbane. In a few days, we'll enter Deep River (Søkkvabekkr), belonging to Saga, wife of Odin and Seeress. Her feast day falls on the Full Moon early next month, and Fasting's Eve is coming up in about a month as we enter the month of Home-of-Strength (þrúðheimr) the patron of which you're most likely all familiar with.

[1] Germanized, for your pleasure. Normally referred to as Sigrblot, Sejrsblod and so on. It means "Rite of Victory" (lit. victory-blood).
R: 11 / I: 3

/WHITE GIRL MAGIC/

What is the best way to subvert the nu-spiritual minded Women in our lives?
You know the type. They are mostly White Alt girls who love crystals, have taken parts of every spiriutal practice and put it in a blender.
I have been incorporating Runes and other esoteric mysteries with great success but I fall short of breaking them of their pozzed spirituality.
R: 2 / I: 0

Personal Development

How did you arrive at your current set of beliefs?
R: 24 / I: 8

/r/ poetry

Beauty and truth is at the core of much of what frens discuss on this board, so rather than take this question to /art/, I'll pose it here.
What is your favourite piece of poetry and why?
I'd like to build up a repertoire of based and beautiful poems, nursery rhymes, songs and the like. I'm having my first son soon, who will grow up with English as well as my native tongue, so I'm mostly interested in English-language poetry.
I like "Tomten" by Viktor Rydberg (in Swedish).
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomten_(poem)
It is about an extratemporal ancestral spirit that visits his living family in winter. The spirit wrestles with the riddle of the beginning and end of heritage and blood. It is very Scandinavian.
I also really enjoy Tolkien's "Riders of Théoden" and "lament of the Rohirrim". I can't exactly say why, but those lines really get me. There's a sense of classical tragedy mixed with Nordic stoicism that speaks to me. "The Havamal" and other Eddic poems have great content, but the artistry is lost in translation from Old Norse.
R: 10 / I: 1

Is Platonism based or cringe?

I was introduced to the metaphysics of Platonism and Neoplatonism a couple of years ago. I learned about Platonism before trying to be Christian again after an atheist phase in my teens and have always found it very compelling. Julian the Great was a Neoplatonist pagan Emporer, and I found his work 'Against the Galileans' very informative. I recently discovered an online personality called Apollonian Germ who is apparently a pagan critical of Platonism, citing its being the foundation of Christianity and that the seperation of the physical self and the ethereal self eventually give way to ideas like being born in the wrong body i.e. transgenderism. That is probably a rough summation of a few points I heard on a podcast, and I'm trying to dig further through his work to see if he has discussed his criticisms at length.
Thought I'd pitch the question to this board, is Platonism/Neoplatonism based or is it cringe?
R: 15 / I: 2

'''The Great Monarch: Future Jewish Trick?'''

Within the context of this board, we understand that this is not meant to be used as a promotion of Christianity.
Initially posted as a reply to >>6129
>Before this happens however, an array of other prophecies are said to need to come true, for instance the mark of the beast and the persecution of Christians.
Weirdest of all I've read when it comes to prophecies, it's that Christian(?) one about the Great Monarch.
I thought at first that it was some kind of fringe Catholic coping mechanism but it is not. I can't even decide if that's a joke or not but it seems documented (redacted? lol). It involves something something France, England, Germany, but mainly France. Now, France is getting a lot of attention lately and it's impossible not to notice how Hollywood emphasized this country too for the last thirty years. I'm wondering if push comes to shove, Jews might even prop a bs "king", a pseudo based figurehead, to maintain control over Western Europe when democracy would prove too cumbersome, too weak and not quick enough into enacting Jewish laws. It's all the more stupendous since Freemasonry has nurtured a deep anti-monarchism for centuries but failed to convince the Catholics that the murder of a king was legit. The last thing we need is a christcuck gigaking protecting the cult of Jewsus and preventing from dying for good. I'm worried that Jews are keeping this ace up their sleeves. The fact that it's almost entirely extra-biblical means Jews could cook up any kind of smelly shit and have the followers of rabbi Yeshu totally fall for it. Picture this, a good goy like that Macron psychopath, but now unencumbered by any need to pretend following republican laws and democracy, appealing to God directly while working on behalf of the (((Pope))). And that's not some small stuff that would be limited to France mind you, it depicts a world wide war and related terrible events.

Here's some material for you to peruse.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tWRRHCrAhYY
https://medium.com/father-aloysius/the-great-monarch-dfca0c3aa521
https://www.amazon.com/Great-Catholic-Monarch-Angelic-Shepherd-ebook/dp/B006NXTW4I
>>For many centuries, from the early years of the Church to the present time, various Saints, Blesseds, and other holy persons have spoken of two figures in the future of the Church: the great Catholic monarch and the Angelic Shepherd. These two holy persons assist the Church and the world during the first part of the tribulation. The Angelic Shepherd guides the Church from the time of a great Ecumenical Council through many spiritual and temporal difficulties.
>>The great Catholic monarch fights a terrible war (World War 4) to free Europe and other nations that were conquered and occupied during World War 3. After the first part of the tribulation, these two leaders guide the Church and the world during a time of peace, holiness, and rebuilding.
>>All this has been prophesied for many centuries. The Bible, too, contains implicit references, in several different books and passages, to these same two persons. And now, in my theological opinion, these two figures have arrived; they are in the world today. This booklet examines many different prophesies about the great Catholic monarch and the Angelic Shepherd (or Angelic Pastor) in private revelation and Sacred Scripture, and proposes the identity of these two figures.
You may not be aware of this, but some historians seriously consider that due to its scope, the Seven Years War was actually some kind of War War Zero, making WW1 and WW2 respectively WW2 and WW3, not the first two world wars but the second and the third world wars: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_Years%27_War
>>The Seven Years' War was perhaps the first global war, taking place almost 160 years before World War I, known as the Great War before the outbreak of World War II, and globally influenced many later major events. Winston Churchill described the conflict as the "first world war".
https://www.catholicworldreport.com/2019/12/14/rewriting-the-future-the-story-of-the-modern-catholic-scenario-for-the-end-times/
https://www.facebook.com/TheTraditionalCatholicsCommentaries/photos/a.395674763871364/960646064040895/?type=3
https://greatmonarch-angelicpontiffprophecies.blogspot.com/2019/02/the-great-catholic-monarch-and-angelic.html
http://www.todayscatholicworld.com/great-catholic-monarch.htm
https://www.cogwriter.com/great-monarch.htm
That one is most bizarre. It's very detailed but goes with an entirely different narrative, namely that the GM is some kind of antichrist and actually anti-Christian (??), thus a would be pagan king-emperor of Europe.
https://gamefaqs.gamespot.com/boards/263-religion/59775466?validate=1
>>Saint Cataldus of Tarentino (c. 500): "The Great Monarch will be in war till he is forty years of age; a king of the House of Lily, he will assemble great armies and expel tyrants from his empire. He will conquer England and other island empires. Greece he will invade and be made a king thereof. Clochis, Cyprus, the Turks and barbarians he will subdue and have all men to worship the Crucified One. He will at length lay down his crown in Jerusalem."
>>"The Empire of the Mohammedans will be broken up (by him)." (Ven. Holzhauser, 17th Century)
>>"The angelic Pope shall place an imperial crown on his head." (Busto, 15th Century)
Sounds like a perfect Zionist ploy.
https://www.tiktok.com/discover/great-catholic-monarch-prophecy?lang=en
R: 32 / I: 6

An introduction to Deism

>What is Deism?
Deism is a religion that supports what is called "natural religion", religious knowledge stated to be inborn in every person or that can be acquired by the use of reason and the rejection of religious knowledge when it is acquired through either revelation or the teaching of any church. Deists derive their moral understandings from observations of nature, believing God not to be a new age-like being that loves everyone equally, instead recognizing he respects strength and wants it to prosper, while weeding out the weak. As Carl Schmitt put it in his book God and Folk: "Hence we affirm the strong God, the God of energy. Hence our ideal as well is not the long-suffering person, rather the hero."

>What Morality can be derived from observing nature?

The first step is to realize there is a purpose behind the existence of things and concepts, the second step is to realize what that purpose is and the third step is to honor that purpose. Let's look at an example to apply that logic to:
>Homosexuality
The purpose of sexuality is the passing on of genes, in other words the collective self-preservation of a genetically homogenous group. Homosexuality does not fulfill that purpose, but instead makes the homosexual gratify themselves with a behavior that is actuallly harmful to his nation and does not in any way adhere to the purpose of his sexual urges. Masturbation, casual sex and other forms of sexual degeneracy are also immoral and satanic (appropriated the term from Christianity, don't care lol), simply meaning going against God's will in Deism, not relating to the biblical Satan. Before anyone brings up sex which does not lead to procreation, but is within a relationship, I believe it to be moral because it helps the relationship last in a wholesome way which is necessary for the parent's offspring to develop well.

There is also a karmic aspect to Deism, which comes down to cause-and-effect, rather than the common association of Karma, which is, in new-age-circles, the idea that "evil/bad" actions (despite a common inability among them to define these words) will magically be punished through suffering in one way or another. The Deistic worldview instead recognizes transgressions against Natural Law and doesn't wait for the transgressor to be hit by lightning, suffer a car crash or be reincarnated as a bug, instead he recognizes the natural consequences of the catlady's whoring around and refusal to reproduce and settle down in her fertile years, when he sees her being depressed and lonely after hitting the wall. She disobeyed Nature's will so she is punished. Not unlike the homosexuals who suffer from various STD's, or the transsexuals who commit suicide en-masse. (They hate themselves, because God hates them, because they transgress his laws)

As Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf:

"The eternal nature relentlessly avenges the transgression of its commandments"
"So his actions against nature must lead to his own downfall"
"For as soon as procreation as such is restricted and the number of births is reduced, the natural struggle for existence, which leaves only the very strongest and healthiest alive, is replaced by the natural addiction to "save" even the weakest, even the sickest, at any price, thus laying the seed for a progeny which must become more and more miserable the longer this mockery of nature and her will continues. The end, however, will be that such a people will one day be deprived of its existence in this world; for man can certainly defy the eternal laws of the will to perpetuate for a certain time, but revenge will come sooner or later."

>The inherent belief in Deism in every human

If I were to ask you about whether or not beastiality and incest are wrong, you would probably agree that they are. Some might not be able to explain why it's disgusting, but there is an inherent feeling of wrongness to it. Those of you who can explain why it's wrong will likely make a deistic argument. The reason you do something as simple as eating food is also Deistic: You are supposed to try to preserve yourself, hunger forces you to.

>Deism cannot be disproven

Unlike other religions that make claims about certain realities, for example stating that the earth is flat (idk if the bible actually states that, just an example), Deism makes no such claims, instead basing its religious beliefs completely on reality, therefore any newfound knowledge would only potentially change the expression of the religion, but not deboonk it.

Feel free to ask any questions on Deism or to expand on anything I wrote.
R: 0 / I: 0
Historical arguments are ripe for fraud. Arguments based on personal experience are more valuable, despite them being literal voices in your head.

Better to hear people say "Odin listened to me" than regurgitated Frankenstein alt-history "Jesus didn't exist" type reverse psyops.

Do any of you know Platonism or astrology? I wonder why you're eager to form an opinion based on "facts" you cannot evaluate.
R: 52 / I: 3

The Adamo-Greenian Deception

While not directly religious in nature, I'm posting this on /r/ due to the omnipresence of Adam Green's content on this board. I would like to preface this by saying that I do largely agree with Adam's takes on Judaism and Christianity, due to the evidence supporting them and a staggering lack of refutation from the Christians. Therefore this post will not as much be a critique of that than a critical examination of what else he's been up to on the internet as a content creator and the person as he presents himself. I will assume the reader already knows of Adam, because the post is directed specifically at those people. If you don't know of him this shouldn't be of interest to you.

Adam Green is a self-proclaimed Atheist[1] who to my knowledge shows no sign of holding any other congruent worldview either. He therefore seems to base his judgements on a moral framework which isn't perfectly clear to him either.

He stated that he considers kabbalist jew Adam King a friend at 2:39:30 during the show they made together.[1] and has gotten visibly and audibly mad at another guest he once had on his show for using the word "kike" to refer to jews.[1]

Being the devout anti-antisemite that he is, it comes to no surprise he doesn't just attack Christianity for its antisemitism, but also National Socialism. According to Green, the National Socialists were Zionists and a controlled oppostion by jewish Zionists. He quotes from a book which calls Hitler a "bolshevic and a zionist".[7] He makes these claims based on the fact that the German National Socialist government had plans of resettling the jews in Palestine, which was also a long standing plan of Zionists.[2] What Adam refuses to acknowledge is that doing so was a perfectly reasonable decision to make at the time. The NSDAP was aware of two things:

1. Jews are a subversive element that needs to be removed
2. Jews hold great power over governments around the world and are both capable of and willing to instigate a world war

Joseph Goebbels even held a speech in which he explained that Hitler was treating jews as second class citizens, but not treating them as harshly as he could, so that the jews overseas won't instigate a war. Working together with Zionist forces to achieve the common goal of removing jews from Germany (NSDAP's goal)/and resettling them in Palestine (Zionist's goal), seemed like a good strategy to the leaders of Germany at the time. Additionally, resettling jews in Palestine wasn't even the initial plan the NSDAP pursued, rather they wanted to bring them to Madagascar, which was hindered by France due to Madagascar being their colony at the time. [8]

Adam Green also criticises the NS government's intentional disassimilation of the jews, which is a retarded take because before Hitler's rise to power in 1933, the jews were destroying Germany from within and would have continued doing so if they hadn't been obstructed from doing so. The jews were never assimilated in the first place and largely had no intention of doing so. Here comes another flaw in Adam's thinking: Why would one even want the jews to assimilate in the first place? True assimilation can only be reached through genetic intermixing between the to be assimilated people and the people in which they are supposed to assimilate into. The admixture of jews into the German genepool would weaken the racial traits of Germans which they value, like honor, work-ethic, bravery and idealism, while increasing greed, laziness and deceitfulness. It would also make the new judeo-German people uglier and more prone to the genetic defects that jews are more commonly afflicted with >>>/x/6893 than the pure Germans were prior to mongrelization. The German people would gain no benefit from intermixing with jews, in fact Hitler and the NSDAP were attempting to improve the German gene-pool, this would do the opposite.

He also uses a board game, named "Juden raus", in English: "Jews out"[3] as "proof" for the NatSocs being controlled opposition. The object of the game is to bring six hats declared as Jews to a collection point in Palestine by moving them back and forth between a Jewish house inside the medieval city walls and a collection point outside the city stylized on the game board. Adam sees the number six as being evidence of jewish prophecy-fuckery. Along with this being a stretch, the game wasn't even affiliated with the NSDAP in any way and was actually criticised by the National Socialists. According to jewish sources over a million copies were sold, but the small number of remnants makes this thesis unlikely.[4]

I also find the idea that the entire NS movement was a jewish psyop to be quite ridiculous. This would mean the jews crafted an entire worldview which diametrically opposes theirs, had multiple great books written on it which resonate with Aryan ideals and natural law, Hitler was the best actor ever who delivered emotional, inspiring speeches and that the awe-inspiring aesthetics, discipline and ethics of the German NS-movement which were above any other nation of the time were just a result of jews creating an oppositional movement to further the goals of Zionism. I would also like to point out how absolutely blackpilling this thesis is. Adam alledges that the only successful rebellion against jewish tyranny was actually a jewop and that the greatest Aryan leader in recent history was a double-agent. The man who wrote a book explaining in great detail everything that is wrong with society down to how politics should be more focused on individuals to ensure no one could evade responsibility or how boys should be taught to box. Are these really things you would think of when writing a book for your controlled-opposition movement as a jewish double agent? And why, if Christianity is the controlled opposition of the jews, that jews want as their nemesis, was the NS movement not Christian instead? This doesn't really line up with Adam's theories on Christianity and one would expect the NSDAP's antisemitism to be irrational in at least one way if it were jew-crafted, but every criticism is spot-on. The lack of proof of jewish control of the NSDAP is also noteworthy, since actual jewish deceptions tend to have quite a lot of glaring holes in them that go unnoticed by the multitudes but are easily noticed by /ourguys/. Are we really to believe the jews were able to construct this movement without making their usual mistakes, despite it being perhaps their most difficult deception to pull of yet? One viewer brings up that the video blackpilled him, saying:
>The most Black Pilling content….tough to stomach, but necessary to know. Thanks Adam.
Which Adam reacts to with a ❤, signaling agreement.[5] Adam therefore seems to know he blackpills people and sees it as a good thing. And it is blackpilling. The two main currents in the dissident right, the sphere which opposes the Judaic rule, are National Socialism and Christianity. Adam attacks both of them as being controlled oppositional movements created by jews. Then, what is there to do? If both are just controlled opposition what can we do? What even is Adam's goal? He isn't outspokenly pro-white, he never proposes any solutions like National Socialist Thomas Sewell does, for example. No, Adam only ever seems to name "exposing the judeo-Christian hoax" as a solution, totally neglecting that we would still be in the same situation if there suddenly were no more Christians around. Even if it was the seed of the evil, the tree of ZOG stands even if the seed was gone. I don't want to put his rabbi-compilations down, I think they're great redpills but this doesn't make my previous statements less true.

Another thing which I find peculiar about Adam is him reporting on a supposed covid death on Telegram[6], promoting fear of the relatively harmless Covid-19. He also, for some reason, has the comment section on his Bitchute videos disabled.

References:
[1] https://madmaxworld.tv/watch?id=64a2f8a62dd399a2c1023db3

[2] https://odysee.com/@KnowMoreNews:1/Holocaust-Rabbis:d

[3]
https://files.catbox.moe/kmtkib.jpg

[4]
https://de.metapedia.org/wiki/Juden_raus

[5]
https://files.catbox.moe/czcg8x.JPG

[6]
https://files.catbox.moe/67ikpd.JPG

[7]
https://annas-archive.org/search?lang=&content=&ext=&sort=&q=Christopher+Jon+Bjerknes+Adolf+Hitler

[8]
https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan
R: 2 / I: 0
Is Mein Kampf a holy book? Rosenberg thought so.
R: 26 / I: 7

Why pagan?

What faith do you follow, what convinved you of it being true and how did you discover it? There is a thread like this on >>>/c/4619 and I figured it'd be an interesting study to compare the differences.
R: 74 / I: 29

Theory on the fruit in genesis

When Adam and Eve ate the fruit in genesis, the snake told them if they ate it, they would become like God.

God is the creator, who created Adam in his own image and Eve out of Adam.

After eating the fruit, Adam and Eve first became aware of their own nudity.

When are you nude? When you have sex, for example. The fruit might very well be a metaphor for sex, which enabled Adam and Eve to become creators of humans in their own image themselves. This is evidenced further by God punishing Eve for eating the fruit by making child birth painful for her, which only happens when she gets pregnant in the first place, i.e. her having sex results in her having to go through a painful birthing process.

The snake, rather than satan, might represent Vril, which can be released through sexual intercourse.
R: 18 / I: 3

Post all your Torah and Tanakh verses about the goyim

I'll start with a few:
Duet 15:6 ‘For Hashem Eloheicha blesseth thee, as He promised thee: and thou shalt lend unto Goyim rabbim, but thou shalt not borrow; and thou shalt reign over Goyim rabbim, but they shall not reign over thee.’
Genesis 49:10-11 ‘The shevet (sceptre) shall not depart from Yehudah, nor a Mekhokek (Lawgiver) from between his raglayim, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall be the obedience of the goyim.’
Genesis 27:29 ‘May the nations serve you, and peoples bow down to you.’
Duet 28:10 ‘Then all peoples of the earth shall see that you are called by the name of the Lord, and they shall be afraid of you.’
Isaiah 60:16 ‘You shall suck the milk of nations; you shall nurse at the breast of kings’
Isaiah 66:12 ‘I will give Jerusalem a river of peace and prosperity. The wealth of the nations will flow to her.’
Isaiah 61:5-6 ‘Strangers shall stand and feed your flocks, And the sons of the foreigner Shall be your plowmen and your vinedressers. But you shall be named the priests of the Lord, They shall call you the servants of our God. You shall eat the riches of the Gentiles, And in their glory you shall boast.’

New Testament and Talmud or Tanya quotes welcome too, even Zohar, but I am primarily interested in the Torah/Hebrew Bible, the 'Old Testament', because they are books that Christians consider to be written by God, and in these books God promises that the jews will reign over the goyim and exploit them and shall be served by them.
R: 147 / I: 36

Anti-Abrahamism General: Abrahamism Deprogramming and Religious Shit-flinging

How can we deprogram abrahamists? What should every "abrahamic fascist" know about their religion? What is the best way to get abrahamists out of our the delusions of kike worship? if that doesnt work, then how can we get them out of our communities? How can we explain that abrahamism is incompatible with a White National Socialist ethnostate?
R: 16 / I: 4

Christians and Pagans - Gnosticism

The number one obstacle to keep Whites from uniting is infighting over RELIGION.

Typically, this is between Christians and Pagans.
Christians are insulted for
>Christcuckery
>worshipping a dead Jew on a stick
while pagans are called something akin to
>mud hut builders
>larpers

Hitler is used as a reference point for BOTH parties because there is evidence Hitler used elements of BOTH Christian and Pagan symbolism to unite his people. Hitler was able to do this because he was a Gnostic. Here are some reference points for my claims.

[In reference to the Jew] "…it must be admitted that the original authors of this evil which has infected the nations were devils incarnate, for only the brain of a monster, and not that of a man, could plan an organization whose activities must finally bring about the collapse of human civilization and turn this world into a desert waste." Mein Kampf pg. 63 -64

This seems to mean Hitler believed that the very soul of the Jew, was not human and was the work of "the devil." So who is the Devil, according to Hitler? He makes several references to Nature with a capital N, which I believe, is a reference to the Demiurge, YHWH the Jewish God. Although this seems to be contradictory at times. He discusses the nature of hierarchy and instinct with a lower case 'n'.

[In reference to Jewish Media] "One ought to realize that for one Goethe, Nature may bring into existence ten thousand such scribblers who act as the worst kind of germ-carriers in poisoning human souls. It was a terrible thought, and yet one which could not be overlooked, that the greater number of the Jews seemed specially destined by Nature to play this shameful part. Was it for this reason that they were called the chosen people?" Mein Kampf pg. 58

Gnosticism believes the material world is a prison of sorts created by the Demiurge, including our own bodies. The only thing holy and worth protecting is our spirit, or our 'divine spark,' which is a small part of the Pleroma, or God / the Almighty Creator.

"Only on one further occasion, and that for the last time, did I give way to oppressing thoughts which caused me some moments of profound anxiety. As I critically reviewed the activities of the Jewish people throughout long periods of history I became perplexed and asked myself whether, for inscrutable reasons beyond the comprehension of poor mortals such as ourselves, Destiny might not have irrevocably
decreed that the final victory should go to this small people? May it not be that this people which lives only for the things of this earth has been promised the earth as a reward?" Mein Kampf pg. 64

Hitler is essentially saying here, the Jewish soul is serving the demiurge by living only for material possessions of the earth and this is the spiritual reason for their material success.

"Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the peoples of this world, his crown will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet 'will once again follow its orbit through ether, devoid of human life, as it did millions of years ago. Nature, the eternal, takes merciless vengeance on those who defy her laws. Therefore, I believe to‐day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In resisting the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord." Mein Kampf pg. 65

Gnosticism, for me, seems to be the world view that efficiently mergers religious/spiritual views and objective views. It can absorb both intellectual objectivism and honor the human instinct for tribe and emotion, without giving into an unbalanced dogma of either side. It's certainly not a perfect world view by any means, and has its own dogmatic issues, but I believe Gnostics are more conscious of the world than your typical atheist or fundamentalist Christian.

If you want to truly understand Gnosticism, read Carl Jung. Here is a video to get started: https://argentbeacon.com/films/omniphi/carl-jung-on-identity-collective-unconscious-and-racial-soul/

Gnosticism is how we unite our people and leave behind our archaic beliefs.
R: 19 / I: 4
Much about Gnosticism has been said already on this new /pol/. I find myself going deep into several rabbit holes and realizing a few things. I see one anon fiercely arguing that all forms of occultism, etc, are broadly forms of Gnosticism. This seems, upon inspection, to be more or less true. Anons then, perhaps accurately, point out the gnostic origins of the entity that (regardless of its true nature, which is surely multifaceted) we have all seemingly agreed to call Globohomo.

I'm willing to grant that:
1. Occultism, as we know it now, has heavy roots in Gnosticism.
2. Globohomo, being clearly interested in occultism, could be said to have gnostic roots.

Now, this being granted, it also seems clear that:
3. Gnosticism is a DEEPLY fractured idea, with many different schools, and you can't really point to a singular ideology that constitutes Gnosticism.
4. Globohomo being a Gnostic entity doesn't necessarily mean all Gnostics are bad actors.

I have seen it argued, for instance, that Gnostics view this world as something to be transcended (again, something that seems broadly true), and thus they're precursors to transhumanists. I've also seen it argued that VR, escapism, etc., is also an extension of Gnosticism. Likewise, I've seen it said that groups like the Free Masons are Gnostic groups.

(Cont.)
R: 20 / I: 5

Evidence of Polytheism and Plagiarism in Islam, Christianity, and Judaism

Polytheism: the doctrine of a plurality of divine beings superior to man, and having part in the government of the world.

In addition to Allah, the Quran makes reference to several other diving beings, and reaffirms the existence of some Jewish and Egyptian deities, the latter through god-reduction into patriarch.

The common defense against the polytheist accusation, is that the multiple other entities are not equals to god. However, in most polytheist religions, there is also a hierarchy of gods, where usually one god sits above all others. So this doesn't excuse the blatant polytheism in Abrahamic religions.

Another common defense is to hide it in terminology. If demons and angels are not considered polytheistic deities, then surely the Tuatha Dé Denann who are called a superhuman race are like the Nephilim who mixed with the daughters of man, or the Giants of Norse mythology, or the Titans of Greek mythology.

The most immediate example is Iblis, or Satan, whose existence is reaffirmed multiple times in the Quran. However, Satan is not explicitly mentioned in the Pentateuch. The view of Satan as a superhuman deity with free will, although not found in any of the 5 books of Moses, is still a view held by Muslims and Christians. The Quran also reaffirms the existence of Shayatin (Satans), which are separate from Iblis/Satan, and are evil jinn who tempt humans away from Islam. Although the deity Iblis/Satan does not exist in the Old Testament, "satans" (Hebrew: "one who opposes") do as analogous with the Muslim concept of Shayatin.

There is also Dajjal, the false messiah or "Antichrist" figure in Islam. Although not referenced in the Quran, he is attested in many Sahih and Sunan Hadith (the authentic sayings of Muhammad after the Quran), which is a significant source of Islamic theology. Also there is Mahdi, the next messianic figure supposed to come after Muhammad, although many Muslims insist Muhammad was the last and final prophet.

Also there exists Gabriel or Jibril, who is tasked with revealing the Quran to Muhammed. Michael or Mikail, who provides sustenance and provisions. Israfil, who blows the trumpet on the day of Judgement. Azrael, the Angel of Death, who takes the souls of the deceased. Lastly, Malik who guards hell.

Azrael, the Angel of Death, is mentioned in the Surah Al-Sajdah (32:11). Jibril and Mikail are both mentioned by name in the Surah Al-Baqarah (2:98) and Jibril before in (2:97). Again referencing Jibril along with Mary and Jesus in Surah Al-Baqarah (2:253). Israfil, although not being named "Israfil" in the Quran, is referenced in the Surah Al-Naml (27:87) and the Surah Al-Zumar (39:68).

This however is just the evidence for polytheism, provided you do not accept the legitimacy of anything outside of the Islamic sphere. There exists plentiful evidence of Abrahamic plagiarism of polytheistic myth, specifically from Egypt.
R: 20 / I: 5

Discussion on the Origins of Christianity

What I am certain of: Christianity is an 'Alexandrian School' repackaging of the 'Divus Julius' (the divine Julius) cult, which itself is a repackaging of the Ptolemaic cult of Alexander the Great.

See: https://www.christcuck.org/

After the Alexandrian Riots in 38CE is when Alexandrian jews associated with the 'Alexandrian School' in Egypt (a school that specialized in religious syncretism. See: Sibylline Oracles), and led by Philo of Alexandria, took the 'Divus Julius' cult (the religion the Romans were most familiar with), and infused a slave morality into it and replaced Julius Caesar with one of the dozens of jewish messianic claimants to subconsciously connect the Romans to jews.

Here's where it gets is confusing. I believe that there were a number of sects of the Divine Julius cult with different people taking Julius Caesars place. Alexandrian Christianity with a jewish messianic claimant is one, another has Julius Caesars son with Cleopatra VII, 'Caesarion', as the deity. Caesarion = Juba II/Drusus/Marcellus. His other sons with Cleopatra VII were Ptolemy XIII aka Octavian/Caesar Augustus and Marcus Agrippa (1). The story of Caesarion's death and Octavian and Juba II's adoptions hides the appearance of a dynasty and kingship which the Romans were against. Juba II (Juba is a diminutive of Yehuva) claimed to be of the Masaesuli/Massylii twin tribes (or 'Michal-Saul' from David's firstborn son with Saul's daughter Michal, where the 'Messiah' royal title comes from). Juba II was married to his half sister Cleopatra Selene II who was the daughter of Cleopatra VII and Mark Antony. Also, as the son of Cleopatra VII he carried the title 'Son of God' as all Egyptian Pharaohs were called that and "King of Kings" which is also a title used by the Pharaohs. Juba II was killed by Caligula. In many cases Roman historical figures had over a dozen aliases, agnomens, regional/ethic names, and different mythologies for each persona, so that is why it is so hard to put the pieces together.

Charles N. Pope is a good source of information. Ralph Ellis is another (I identify Ralph Ellis's King Izates as Marcus Julius Alexander aka Gaius Plinius Secundus aka 'Pliny the Elder' aka Gaius Calpernius Piso, son of Alexander, son of King Herod who Charles N. Pope claims was Mark Anthony).

To keep things simple just think: Divine Julius cult → Alexandrian School led by Philo of Alexander → Christianity.

Can anyone add anything else to this?

[1]http://www.domainofman.com/A%20Julio-Claudian%20Genealogy.pdf
https://web.archive.org/web/20230913204543/http://thenazareneway.com/MM%20Chart.htm
https://www.google.com/books/edition/Jesus_Among_the_Julio_Claudians/c7A3DwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1
R: 13 / I: 2
Islam, Christianity, and Judaism all have a similar heritage. However, Satanic polytheistic leaders such as Samiri and Paul destroyed Judaism and Christianity, which followed pure monotheistic principles and submitted to Allah SWT alone.

The secret to the heavens is in eliminating polytheism, which is the worst thing that has ever existed in this cosmos.
R: 0 / I: 0

The Root Cause

Everyone needs to be familiar with the sacred order which every man accords to.

The spirit reigns supreme. Everything else, your happiness, wealth, health and success socially depends on your spiritual well-being and sanity.

Any leader worth his salt wants to be in contact with higher powers and seek refuge in supportive entities when struggling for the things worth living for. Faith is key when you want to keep going and do your best. You cannot retain any trace amount of charisma and magnanimity if your spirit is bogged down by mundane sorrows.

The jews are cursing you everyday, the entire bible, front to back, is written by them. There is an undeniable ethnic bias at work, which you can see when discussing alternative religions with very similar traditional family values.

Despite its supposed universalism, Christianity is rooted in the jewish desire to take over the world, by any means necessary. Once a convert, everything "pagan" is set to be destroyed.

Note that the spiritual side of it is ENTIRELY real. When you pray, you ARE talking to conscious entities. Common sense should let you intuit what it means for your spiritual well-being, and everything downstream, your happiness, health, wealth and social bond.

The wrong take on spirituality kills leadership. And it's meant to.
R: 12 / I: 4

Selling your soul

Your soul is your genetic makeup. You share a racial soul with the other Aryans, and further even with humanity, mammals and animalkind itself. Fragments of your soul get reincarnated in your offspring through genes that are inherited. What selling your soul means is to be a race-traitor. It is choosing the illusion of individualism to the detriment of the larger organism that is your nation and your race. Selling your soul costs you the inheritance of eternal life that you could have had. Some sell their souls for money (politicians), others for pussy (Asian wives), others for convenience. Selling your soul won't send it to hell for eternal torment, but it will sever it from life.
R: 6 / I: 1

"Jesus" was the jewish son of King Herod

Jesus = Juba II aka Alexandros III, son of King Herod. The name Juba is a diminutive of Yehuva (Jehovah) which translates to "God is my father". Also, "the Son of the Man" is a Koine->Aramaic->Koine mistranslation of Alexander.

https://www.christcuck.org/p/theory-on-origins-of-christianity.html

What do you think of this theory?
R: 5 / I: 1

How do I make my conscious mind one with the Uniiverse

I seek to connect my mind with the universal consciousness in order to help Secure the Existence of our people and a future for white children. I’ve read some pierce on this subject but want to hear your own personal takes on this. I really don’t give a shit about individual glory from this, only trying to stop the aryan from going extinct
R: 8 / I: 0

The myth of putting race above religion

In our circles the idea of putting ones race above ones religion is often circulated. While I don't disagree with the sentiment behind it, I find this quite a peculiar idea as it suggests that it is possible to put anything above ones own religion, which I don't believe to be the case, nor that putting ones religion first is necessarily detrimental to ones race in any way. Multiple aspects are associated with the term religion:

>Metaphysics

Whether you believe in the existence of ghosts, demons, reincarnation, souls, etc. or you don't, is irrelevant to your race. There isn't a situation in which I have to put my race above my disbelief in demons, it's simply a ridiculous idea. The two do not conflict, much like I don't have to decide between wearing jeans and standing up straight. Metaphysics is clearly not the issue here which pits religion against race.

>Worldview, values and the gods you worship

Only if you subscribe to a religious dogma which places your duty to something other than your race - which conflicts with your race's interests - above your race is it necessary to "put your race above your religion", in order to still be pro-White. The contradiction being that putting your race first is itself a religious declaration. Maybe whatever religion you think you believe in isn't the one you actually follow. The statement "I put race above religion" is nothing but a cope created by White christians to deal with the cognitive dissonance created by a religion whose goals and god are at odds with the goals of White nationalism. Often they have found this new truth of nationalism but are unable to leave behind the old baggage of christianity holding them back. To non-abrahamic nationalists, the question of whether they put race or religion first is often confusing, as putting their race first is part of their religion, just as putting money first is part of the capitalist's religion. In reality, putting anything above your religion is impossible, as it is the basis for any of our thoughts and actions.
R: 11 / I: 0
Picked up this esoteric reading list here. Was going through the titles and noticed quite a few appear be satanic/luciferian. Can anyone confirm or deny that in regard to specific books from list? Not a christian, but I'm still not down with satanic (i.e. jewish) stuff. Thank you.
R: 14 / I: 3

Folk Tales

A thread for folk tales, fairy tales, ballads and the like. These are typically myths of old encrypted to avoid persecution by yids and their golems. See for example: https://www.odelsarven.com/single-post/beiarblakken or https://library.frenschan.org/book/1162
Some, like vidrel, are more modern but still encrypted to avoid dealing with yids and their golems. I've transcribed vidrel below:

The man’s house stood upon the hill and ruled. It ruled over the guarden, trees and bushes, the fields, the meadows and pastures and it ruled over the forests as well, which began from behind the hill and stretched on up to the mountains. The trees produced fruit, and the man who lived in the house picked the fruit and stored it away for the winter. He collected the crops and put them away in the basement where the frost couldn’t reach. From the fields he gathered grain, from the meadows hay, and from the forest firewood. And he placed all these things around the house in the most practical way. This is how the house lived, and inside it the man, for a long time.
On a grey autumn day, when the rain hung from the sky, two tiny wet rats arrived from somewhere. They had journeyed there from far away, they were cold and hungry. They saw the house, sneaked in through the open door and hid away in the basement. They found plenty of food, ate themselves full and soon they began to fatten up. By winter, they had offspring, and then once again in the spring. The young rats who grew up in the house felt that it was their home, and they ran around in the basement as though it belonged to them.
The man, at first, didn’t even see them. Later on, he noticed that something was eating his stored crops, but he didn’t bother with it. There was enough. Enough for whoever was hungry. Then once he saw a rat running alongside the wall. “How tiny and how timid,” he thought. “Let him live too, if he wants.” And so, time passed, and the rats increased in number.
First, they dug up the basement. Then they began digging in the walls. They drilled deep, winding, criss-crossing holes, and here and there they even reached the rooms. The man shook his head when he saw the first rat hole in his room. And because he did not appreciate disorder, he filled in the hole and whitewashed the wall. The next morning, the hole was already back. And because he did not appreciate disorder, he filled in the hole and whitewashed the wall. The next morning, the hole was already back. Then the man waved a disregarding hand and thought: “They have to live somehow, too. And if this is the only good way for them, so let it be.” And starting from then on, he no longer filled in the holes.
The rats meanwhile multiplied in number, and so did the holes in the house. Now, the rats not only sneaked around in the basement, but in the pantry, the attic… and at night they even entered the rooms and chewed on everything chewable. Then once, when the rats began to chew the man’s dress boots, the man got angry, and he slammed down with the head of an axe. He hit one of the rats in the head, and the rat died.
Mortally insulted, the rats got together and they immediately announced that man was the enemy who won’t allow them to live, restricts their freedom, ignores their rights, is a murderer, selfish and evil! “We won’t be his slaves any longer!” squeaked the rat leader from the top of a grease bucket. “We demand our freedom, and our rights!” And so the rats decided to begin a war against the man.
The man knew nothing of all this. He quickly forgot his anger, bought another pair of dress boots, and no longer bothered himself with the doing of rats. Even though, by then, there were thousands of them. They ate all the crops in the basement, all the flour in the pantry, and all the cheese. They even began nibbling on the bacon despite knowing that that was the man’s most guarded treasure, what he would not even share with his dog. The man, when he noticed this, took the remaining bacon, tied it to a pole and hung it from a beam.
This is when real rage consumed the rats. “Injustice! Insolence!” they screeched when they realised that they were unable to get near the bacon. “He steals our food, he raids and exploits us! We won’t stand for this any longer!” And they rebelled. “The house is ours,” they announced amongst themselves. “It was always ours, we just allowed the man to stay for as long as he behaved himself! But we’ve had enough of him!” And one night, while the man slept, the rats ran over his body, bit him everywhere, chased him out of the house and until he was far, far away. And then, they proudly announced to the garden, the trees, the animals and the birds, and even the flowers, that this is no longer man’s land, this is rat’s land, by the right of law.
And with that, they began to rule as rats do. They ate everything that was edible, and chewed everything that was not edible but appeared before their eyes. Systematically, the basement, the pantry, and the store of grain were emptied. The birds moved on, the flowers wilted and died, the house’s walls began to crumble and blacken, and a horrible stench replaced the sweet scent of trees and flowers. And winter arrived. The rats had eaten and chewed everything by then. The walls were full of holes, the shingles of the roof had fallen off, gaping cavities opened up underneath the windows and doors. And they began to starve because there was not more than a single kernel of grain, and the wind pierced through the broken door and cracked walls, snow fell through the damaged roof, and the rats were unable to help themselves.
First, they fought amongst themselves, they maimed and killed each other, chewed and ate each other but in the end they could do no more. They got up and abandoned the destroyed kingdom.
The man then peacefully returned in the spring. He fixed the roof, cleaned out the house, mended and white-washed the walls, tilled the field, planted crops and flowers, and by the time summer arrived, the scent of flowers and the singing of songbirds surrounded the house. By autumn, the basement was full again as was the pantry and grain store, and in the winter everything appeared as though nothing bad had ever happened.
However, there were a few rats left, hidden away in the walls or in the depths of the basement. And when the man noticed, that they once again were reproducing… he thought long and hard about what he ought to do with them.
You think on it, too, and act accordingly.
R: 24 / I: 1 (sticky)

Do not let religious debate become religious division

Dear Frens, it has become apparent that religious strife has taken over the discussion on our dear board, to such a degree that the mods had to update the rules several times to avoid “cross-board raids”. Increasingly, Frens do not see each other as Frens, but denizens of either /c/ or /r/, with the respective other as a hostile entity. This sentiment is as foolish as it is dangerous. I do not argue that religious discussion should be stifled, indeed I think it is crucial and logical that our political awakening is followed by a spiritual one.
However, it is by no means a new phenomenon that our enemy uses any crack in the front to claw open a wide rift between us and sow division and hate between White people. Christian vs. Pagan shilling has been a well-known phenomenon on 4troons and is a contributing factor why the site has become unusable and this place had to be created. Of course, the problem itself is much older, as clearly stated by the Old Man himself. I citate Mein Kampf, Chapter 10:
>”In the winter of 1918-1919 a kind of anti-semitism began slowly to take root. Later on the National Socialist Movement presented the jewish problem in a new light. […] But the moment we were successful in placing this problem before the German people in the light of an idea that would unite them in one struggle the jew reacted. He resorted to his old tactics. With amazing alacrity he hurled the torch of discord into the patriotic movement and opened a rift there. In bringing forward the ultramontane question and in the mutual quarrels that it gave rise to between Catholicism and Protestantism lay the sole possibility, as conditions then were, of occupying public attention with other problems and thus ward off the attack which had been concentrated against jewry. The men who dragged our people into this controversy can never make amends for the crime they then committed against the nation. Anyhow, the jew has attained the ends he desired. Catholics and Protestants are fighting with one another to their hearts’ content, while the enemy of Aryan humanity and all Christendom is laughing up his sleeve.”
Although Hitler talks about Christian confessions, (as he lived in a more heavily Christianised society,) it is clear that the Führer recognised that theological differences and debates are a tool for the jews to distract Whites from dealing with the archenemy, rather than a stepping stone to victory against him. So pressing was the jewish question in his eyes that he would rather neglect the religious debate, although he surely had his own strong convictions about God and Faith.
On Frenschan, were the moderation usually deals quickly with porn, demoralisation, garbage-tier slidethreads and other derailing factors, it seems that after some probing, the jews have found their attack angle and are doubling down on their ancient and proven tricks. I am convinced that arguing in bad faith comes neither from Christian nor Pagan Frens, but from JEWISH SHILLS. Yes, any kike can easily go on an anymous image board and vomit out his profanities, and LARP, and SHILL and DIVIDE, and it comes to him as naturally as charging interest on his own grandma.

What can be done against this most insidious attack? The moderation has answered with a more elaborate set of rules, but I think that this will not be enough to end the problem. In the worst case, it could cement the separation between /c/ and /r/ that we are witnessing, which would be a decisive victory for the kikes. Instead, I call upon Frens to take a step back on the whole debate, recollect themselves, and remember what they know, the basics:



>1: Shills

You already KNOW that jewish shills operate on the internet, and you know they sow division and mistrust. Obviously, this extends to religious debate, but it appears many Frens forgot that genuine shilling could be behind a retarded and offensive religious debater. It is entirely possible that a person that responds with rustled jimmies towards a shill and accuses the whole opposite team of being traitorous retards is a LARPing shill himself, but many reactions seem authentic. In religious debate, you should always assume that a debater that argues politely and in good faith is a real Fren, but a sperg and divider to be a shill.

>2: National Socialism

I assume that many posters here are already grown up and probably started families, or at least their parent’s questions about grandkids are not entirely jokes anymore. This should explain why religious boards have such a weight in the first place, we get older and seek higher meaning. Yet, originally, we all spilled over here from 4/pol/, from Politics. This is where we first found answers to our nagging questions, this is where we were redpilled on why the fuck everything goes to shit in our countries, this is where we learned about a political theory that not only provided logical and satisfying answers to our questions, but also practical and proven solutions. This was National Socialism, and National Socialism always puts racial unity first, and does only superficially touch theological aspects. Many quotes of Hitler and other Natsoc thinkers on religion are contradictory. These are then flung around in religious debates to prove which religious woldview is superior over the other. Curious, the validity of a religious worldview is based by many upon the opinion of political leaders, rather that it’s intrinsic arguments. It appears that Hitler is more important to most of us than religion anyways, and we should concentrate on the uniting factor of our struggle, as Hitler intended.

>3: Adjust your mindset

As we remembered our journey on the internet and what we have learned through it, it becomes clear that religion was probably not the most important factor in the beginning for most people. I am pretty sure that 99% of you guys did not start out which a strong theological foundation in neither Christianity nor Paganism, but were rather atheistic and even hedonistic in your teens. Nevertheless, you were instinctively revolted by the state of our society. Probably by something as trivial as the sight of a feral nigger, roaming the streets unrestricted and unsupervised, ready to strike and maim at any second. This is the core instinct that drove us forward, forward to Politics – to /pol/. Consequently, this should be the board were we should primarily post and debate. Reject the false division between /c/ and /r/, it should not be the primary focus on your visits on Frenschan. I will continue to visit these boards and to engage in religious debate, but I will focus on finding practical solutions to defeat the kike. This should be the prime objective. A group of theological debater, eternally distracted by the infinity of the divine, is not a threat to them. But they FEAR the unified White race.
R: 55 / I: 5

ITT: Eastern Religious Texts

I'm not sure what the exact religious composition of our frenship board is, but I feel like I have seen more discussions on Christianity, Judaism, and Gnosticism than I have any Eastern religions. Even if you don't personally believe in Buddhism, Hinduism, Shinto, etc., they're still fascinating faiths to study.

To start things off, I'd like to recommend one of my favorite Zen Buddhist texts: The Unfettered Mind by Takuan Soho. While not originally written as a singular work, the three letters that comprise it flow well together. Soho was writing to the Samurai class, for whom Zen played a vital role. While some forms of Buddhism are strictly anti-violence, regardless of circumstances, Soho recommends a more reasonable approach that allows for things like self-defense. This was necessary for the Samurai, philosophically. They would be pretty helpless if they couldn't fight.

A good place to start for more traditional Buddhism (i.e. Theravada Buddhism) is the Pali Canon. Start with The Book of the Discipline and go from there. You're in for a long read if you go the full Pali Canon route. It's similar to tackling the Bible end-to-end.

What do you see as the "must reads" of Eastern Religion?
R: 116 / I: 16

I really tried to be a Christian, I just can't.

I have tried to make myself be a Christian for round a year or so now. I immerse myself in Scripture, am very knowledgeable about the Bible and especially the New Testament. I read Koine Greek and know the Bible in its original tongue. I pray every day. I just cannot get past the nature of this religion.
There are so many things about Christianity that I find impossible to reckon with.
I dont understand God choosing some particular 'people' and only revealing himself to them over thousands of years in order to have his Son come from them, I have the thought that if God really wanted to get the message out that he would have had peoples in many places. It is not like he would have been incapable, he is omnipotent, and even given free will, if he recruited the Israelites he surely could have recruited another people group. According to scripture, God can harden a heart or make a heart receptive to him, and the heart of a king is in his hands.
I dont understand the entire purpose of creation being to have a judgement of sinners and saints at the end of time, I get the sense that it is a sort of game that God has set up and that is unnecessarily convoluted. The way God created man and could not have not known that they would sin and then convicting them thusly, but running this eternal courtroom anyway, that really makes it seem like a game. To clarify, I don't struggle with the concept of sin or karma being an accounting factor in our souls that affects what happens to it. But the peculiarity and particularity of YHWH in the OT and then the incarnation of the word, I very much struggle with. Maybe I did LSD and mushrooms too many times in my teens and now I am at a point of almost being too far gone to try and reach a satisfactory logical grasp of the mechanics of God's whole thing going on here (creation and eternity).
It feels anything but righteous or divine, it feels like God is messing with us. Cosmic gauntlet which is designed in such a way as to make it so that only those who resign the reasoning within them completely can make it to Heaven, the same conduct that could make someone accept another false religion by resigning their reasoning, God did not make the one true faith simple to understand, another way of making it convoluted and like a messed-up game.
The soteriology is faulty. As I mentioned earlier and am not the first to observe, God created Adam and Eve with sin and knew they were going to sin and exactly where and why, but then punished them for sin. Even without the idea of original sin, God designs us with a heart after foolishness and wrath and then designs an uncompelling salvation through a singular geographically-specific event by sacrificing himself to himself so that he can forgive us of the way he made us.
If God earnestly wanted to make salvation for the human race, surely he wouldn't make such an incomprehensible scheme in a very particular place in a way that would take the message thousands of years to spread and has still not reached many many people today, and there is no immediately compelling reason to believe it outside of the characteristic appeal of Christianity, i.e. the hard to describe sort of cult of personality of the idea of Jesus. It seems that God does not want the message to spread effectively or to be received effectively, again like a messed up game that he stacked the deck on to mess with people and see how many can find the one true way by denying themselves and going in anyway without a completely solid sure reason besides that which we can convince ourselves of.
You can make yourself completely sure of something if you want to believe it. I want to believe Christianity because it would make my life a lot easier if it were true. My entire family are deeply committed Christians who are very emotionally distressed over my not being saved and having the status of going to hell if I were to die. My girlfriend and best friend of 10 years who I very much want to marry is a committed Christian. I am a Bible nerd and very much enjoy studying it and being able to talk to others about it, but it seems to me to be a literary pursuit on my part at this point, though for a long time it was strongly spiritually seeking. I wish I could make myself believe it. I have read much philosophy, I want the truth, and if I feel like I have to deny reason itself at the most fundamental reason, I just can't cross that bridge fully. I remember even thinking to myself when I was on the cusp of fully committing to belief in Christianity that 'Satan has taken control of logic itself and uses it to lead people away from the truth, and it is a righteousness to abandon logic for the truth.'
R: 37 / I: 4

Asatru Organization in Germany Destroyed

HAPPENING: This Wednesday the religious community in Germany "Artgemeinschaft – Germanische Glaubens-Gemeinschaft wesensgemäßer Lebensgestaltung" was declared as an illegal organization and the police raided several of their members across the country.

The organization was a religious community which held solstice celebrations, did summer camps and seeked a return to traditional Germanic values and practices. It was criticized by the far-left extremist minister of internal affairs Nancy Faeser for being a folkish, heathen, national socialist, right-wing community that "indoctrinates" children.

Along with the terrorization of its members, their website asatru.de was also seized by glowniggers.

The Artgemeinschaft - Germanische Glaubens-Gemeinschaft wesensgemäßer Lebensgestaltung was a neo-pagan folk organization until it was banned by the Federal Ministry of the Interior of the FRG in September 2023. Nationwide the Artgemeinschaft had about 150 members.

The Artgemeinschaft celebrated and supported alternative life celebrations (cradle celebration, youth celebration, marriage consecration, death celebration). In addition to regular community days for the entire community, lecture, debate and community evenings were held in smaller circles at the national level.

Nationwide, 26 apartments of 39 members as well as rooms of the association in twelve federal states were searched, according to Berlin. The officials stole "extremist" literature, uniforms, gold, cash, firearms and crossbows.
R: 14 / I: 1

Holding a religion to a certain race is cringe

Everytime I read something like "* man's religion" or the "* man's religion" or the "**** man's religion", I cringe so hard at it, like religions are meant to unite people no matter what their ethnicities are

Judaism is not exclsuive fot the "jewish race", there is no jewish race, the people that got the torah were the hebrews, and hebrews are the cousins of the arabs and canaanites

Christianity is not exclsuive for the white race, the people that got the bible were the Canaanites, that were invaded then by the roman empire

Islam is not exclsuive for the semitic people, the people that got the quran were the arabs

But some ethnicities have developed a lot egotistical traits towards these religions, like how african americans tried to make the kkk version of islam aka "nation of islam"

Or how some caucasians want you to believe that jesus was a caucasian man with a blonde hair ( caucasian men with blonde hair are totally fine and not everyone of them is hitler )

racial superiority is an illusion that destroyed a lot of people minds and minmal diversity with securing a place for multiple different ethnicities is not bad
R: 14 / I: 13

/r/eading recommendations

Post reviews/recommendations for books which have shaped your religious views, or you believe should be thrown into the melting pot of doctrine that shall be casted into the coming Aryan faith.

RULES FOR THE THREAD:
1. You may only recommend books you have actually read and finished.
2. You may only recommend books that are somewhat relevant to the goings on of /r/.
3. You may only recommend one book per post to keep things easy to navigate.
4. Put the title of your book in big lettering, two "=" on each side of the title
5. Include a picture of the cover of your book if at all possible, alternatively a picture of the author, a picture of an excerpt from your book, or at least just a picture that is somewhat related to your book. Again, this makes it easier to navigate.
6. Include as much relevant hard data about your book as possible, such as the author, the specific translation or edition (if any), the page count, the publishing year, and so on. These things may not seem important, but they can be to a reader looking for something specific.
7. Link to your book if it is in the Library or in some other archive. Once we can upload to the Library again, if your book isn't there, make sure to upload it if you have a digital copy.
8. Keep the proselytizing to an absolute minimum, and do not start ideological debates ITT.
9. Describe the book however you like, with as little as one sentence, or as much as a whole essay.
There's nothing wrong with multiple reviews of the same book, please just give a (you) to the first reviewer for ease of navigation, and mark your review as being the second, third, etc. review in the thread.

Suggested format:
TITLE
Author/Translator; Year/Edition; Page Count
Link
Description

>/pol/RRG:

>>>/pol/62862
>Religion
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/1198/
>Doctrine
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/853
>Esoteric Hitlerism
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/989
>Stoicism
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/781
>Abrahamism
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/1199
>Christianity
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/1201
>Islam
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/1202
>Judaism
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/1200
>Paganism
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/1204
>Philosophy
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/780
>Oriental Religions
https://library.frenschan.org/category/stored/1212
R: 53 / I: 6

Metaculturally Uniting Whites with Relgion

[Thread originally started >>9027]

There needs to be a religion for the White* race.

Christianity is Semitic; this is decidedly so. Everything great about European Christendom is due to its White practitioners. What wondrous aesthetic works can you think of from Coptic or Syriac Christians? Pre-Columbian Amerindians built pyramids. What have they done since converting?

"Paganism" is not a religion, but a paradigm for religions. It mainly refers to pre-Christian European ethnic religions, and it's a Jewish hate word. ("Pagan" is the equivalent of "redneck," and was invented by Semitic urbanites to demean those they'd failed to convert to Judeo-Christianity. See also "Gentile," "heathen," and "goy.") When one says they're a pagan, they're either practicing a specific polytheistic folk religion, or they're practicing a modern, syncretic religion, like Wicca. Personally, I don't believe in gods, per se, and I think getting the average White to RETVRN to polytheism would be a hard sell. (For better or worse, Abrahamic religion has fundamentally altered the common perception of religion.)

There's also an issue with paganism that it's not necessarily "White." It's ethnic and polytheistic. Unless we go full interpretatio graeca and assume an ur-pantheon from which all deities derive, Thor isn't Zeus, Kama isn't Eros, and Freya isn't Aphrodite. Paganism is better than Christianity, but there's nothing that theologically unites Anglo-Saxon pagans and Slavic pagans that couldn't also unite Hindus, Tengrists, and voodoo witch doctors. What does unite Anglo-Saxons and Slavs is a common (recent) origin.

From the outside, I think the White religion would most resemble a de-Jewed Catholicism. Roman Catholicism spread through the Roman Empire. Eastern Orthodoxy technically did as well. While philosophically, this religion was a Jew wearing a Greek philosopher's skin, aesthetically, it was a White artist switching out scenes from mythology for scenes from the Bible. It was the first religiously unifying force in Europe, as Greeks and Romans did not convert so much as interpret and augment. (This continued in a way through the Catholic Church's syncretic practice of moving liturgical holy days near pagan holy days. They may have straight up sanctified a Celtic goddess with Brigid.) What draws most racially aware Zoomers to tradcath is that it's the least Christian form of Christianity and is very aesthetically stimulating.

It should be the White response to Judaism. Judaism teaches Jews they are the supreme race, and all others are cattle who must bow to them or be destroyed. One day the whole world will be ruled from Jerusalem by a descendent of King David, and all non-Jews will serve Jews. The most religious among them won't mix fabrics or certain kinds of foods or sow different crops near each other, all as a reminder to not mix with others. I don't think White religion needs to be as megalomaniacally supremacist as Judaism, but it should teach Whites not to mix with non-Whites and that Whites have unique qualities worthy of preserving and proliferating.

At the time of this posting, there are a couple esoteric Hitlerism threads. I'm not crazy about that move. I think Savitri Devi had some good ideas, but most of it is hokey nonsense that deifies a politician, when it's what he stood for that's important. (If you meet the Fuehrer on the road, kill him?)

*I choose to use "White" over "Aryan" (which could arguably include Kurds, Persians, northern Indians, etc., and is often used as a moral designation in Indic religions) or "European" (which is tied up in geopolitics). I'd rather avoid colorist implications, as I don't think race is merely an issue of pigmentation, but I also think it's the best word we've got.
R: 39 / I: 24

SONNENRAD

ITT we discuss the esoteric symbolism within the mysterious Sonnenrad, it's prevalence within Germanic culture, and it's history far beyond the industrial revolution.

Here's an interesting bit in regards to it's history, tying it deeply to ancient Egyptian religion that is probably worth a watch!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/IgdfaotYKQHK/
>inb4 jews call it satanic
R: 10 / I: 2

Return to religion

I would like to get back into religion, I grew up in a Christian background but as time went by I stopped believing (due to the influence of intention), my life experience today has shown me that there must be something higher (or at least there should be) , I have read the Bible recently (as a recreation), but I am not totally alien to certain ideas of neo-paganism.

Guide me on how I can reconnect with religion and in what beliefs you have found the path.
R: 3 / I: 0

Enlightenment

I have reached a state of enlightenment concerning my own suffering, even though my life is generally good and I have most of the things I want, I still suffer daily, negative thoughts, confusion, little pains, being tired, this is a day to day suffering, usually broken up by long segments of feeling well, but the suffering always returns, in staid of falling into self-negation or popular hedonism, the enlightened aspect of the realization I got was that we should be free to cause suffering to others, why not? The suffering never truly ends, so in staid of trying to stop it, we should just continue causing suffering, war, enslavement, are these really that much different from daily existence? I mean, at the end of the day I still suffer and so does everyone else.
R: 8 / I: 2

I saw Heilung last night

At the beginning of the show, the lead vocalist came out and wafted sage smoke all over the stage and over the instruments,he recited some ceremonial rites and I heard him say the name Wotan, and he wafted sage smoke over all the performers as they came out. They all got in a circle and recited another ceremonial rite or something and got into the show. The crowd was a mix between goth/emo, plain country folk, and then regular looking white people dressed in black but put together and well groomed, i thought they may have been white nationalist or neo-pagan. During the show I went to the bathroom and heard someone talking about how they were liking the show so far but said one or two things about how they didn't know about this or that, and a tattoo-covered white nationalist looking guy walked by and said to him 'Yeah well some people have lived it, brother'.
Made me think he was a genuine neo-pagan or Astaru something or another, I was sort of surprised at the turnout and how many people know the lyrics and the ritual rites and recited them along perfectly. This show was in Huntsville, Alabama. Maybe there's more people deprogrammed from the jewish mystery religion than I thought? I'd be interested to see about fellowship with the neo-pagans who were the clean-cut respectable looking type, not so much the tattoo covered manlet who said that he really lived it but I'm not writing him off either.
Anyway I really enjoyed the show. Maria Franz was absolutely incredible and all of the performances were entrancing. Made me feel perhaps there is some kind of hope for a new generation of Europeans to genuinely practice their native customs.
There is a tragedy for us who are mutt-merican and can never actually have a pure version of that native ethno-religious culture that our ancestors had. It was very nice to witness it from Heilung, though. Also I saw one black person in the entire crowd. Wonder what he was thinking.
R: 83 / I: 23

Atheism Discussion

I am curious to know if anyone is an atheist. Within the dissident right, it seems that practically everyone subscribes to some sort of spiritual worldview, be it Christian, Europoagan, something Eastern, etc. It's understandable to me why this is (I'm not an atheist myself,) so I don't mean to argue for atheism as a superior position within the space of this ideology, but I more wonder if it's considered possible in the first place to be an atheist while also being based. I think it could theoretically be possible, as one could swallow all the redpills, use Natural Law as a basis of morality, and still seek to establish some sort of religious practice, accounting for its importance to the human psyche on an individual and societal level, while yet not actually believing in the soul or afterlife himself, and that this one physical existence is what you get. IMO, the formal arguments for true atheism honestly aren't retarded on their own merits, and it's a position that you can make about as strong a case for as any dogmatic spiritual worldview. The problem is that it's overwhelmingly co-opted by reddit atheists and their ilk to excuse living like utter degenerates. So it by default gets associated in our minds as a stupid and repulsive worldview, since 99% of the time it's held by stupid and repulsive people.

But does the unicorn that is the based and redpilled atheist exist? Can it exist? Why or why not?
R: 2 / I: 0

Esoteric Saturn thread

There's a prominent theory that Saturn was once the "first sun" during the "golden age" and that he was "cast down from heaven" during the "fall". People sometimes purport that Saturn is Satan in this regard, mythologically, and cosmologically people say that Saturn was once a star or sun and that Earth with possible a few other inner planets once rotated around Saturn but our solar system came to close the present and was captured by it and Saturn became just another planet. So, in essence, Saturn once ruled the world, but now is dominated by our Sun and isn't the biggest planet (Jupiter) or the farthest out (Neptune).

So, I think this explains a lot about Jews and other Satanic worshipers. They long for a time in the far past, when they had real power, but are completely misaligned for reality as it actually is today, so they wish to punish the world and force us to eat bugs and suffer because they themselves are suffering so much from being dethroned and outclassed. They wish to believe "Satan rules this world" when in reality "Satan used to rule the world, but now is merely a middle child."

I think this explains a lot about Satanic psychology and insecurity, just wanted to share it.
R: 92 / I: 16

Post-theism/Naturalism

[This thread is being resurrected from an archive snapshot.]

Do any other frens like religion but don't believe in the supernatural? I see /ourguys/ attacking "materialism" all the time, but it confuses me because how can you be a White nationalist without a focus on the material?

Jordan Peterson (yeah, I know) once said something I think about a lot. He talked about how animal sacrifice was a ritual precursor to the abstraction of sacrifice, of trading something precious for the hope of a future good. Offerings to God or the gods were actually bargaining with the future, and the abstract version of that (which was necessary for the invention of agriculture) had to be developed. I think a lot of religion is like that: the rituals were concrete performances embodying real but abstract concepts we're now ready to approach directly. Now we all know killing goats won't change the weather, but trading precious resources (time, attention, effort, etc.) can procure beneficial future states (especially for White children).

Before Christianity took over Europe, this seemed to be the way things were moving. Neoplatonism or something like it would probably have spread across Europe, where "the gods" would've become aspects of God/the One, who is the Ultimate Reality. Science could've evolved as a means of approaching that Reality instead of fighting against dogma and essentially becoming a shadow of Abrahamism.

Let's discuss non-spooky approaches to religion.
R: 72 / I: 31

Countering Arguments that Jesus/Christianity isn't Jewish

Let's get a thread going on countering all the arguments made about Jesus/Christianity not being Jewish. They seem to all rest on a few premises:

1. Jews are not really Jews. Jews are fake Jews, and Whites are the real Jews.
2. There are good Jews, and this one in particular should be our god/prophet.
3. Your ancestors converted, therefore you are dishonoring them by not worshiping a Jew.
4. Jesus himself was Aryan, despite living among Jews, speaking the Jew tongue, and practicing Jewish religion.

Here are a few I know of:

>Jews are not the Jews of the Bible but Khazars.

Firstly, this has only ever applied to Ashkenazim. And while the the Khaganate of Khazaria did convert to Judaism, they did so because of the presence of Jews in Khazaria, banished from both Christendom and Islamdom. Their conversion would have nothing to do with the behavior of Jews prior to the 8th century, who acted every bit the Jew as allegedly Khazarian Jews. If it is the case that Ashkenazim are fully Khazarian with no Levantine blood (it isn't), then Judaism can be shown to inherently transform people into shekel-grubbing goblins regardless of race, and Christianity is a type of Judaism.

>There were no "Jews" until [insert year]

This is a bizarre argument that can only be made by someone with no concept of the evolution of language. It usually says something like, "The word translated 'Jew' in the Bible actually means 'Judaean.' " Yes. That's what "Jew" means. "Judaean." "Judahite." "Yehudim." These aren't distinct concepts any more than cheese and Käse are different kinds of food. Maybe you could argue "Judaean" means specifically "one who lives in the province of Judaea" as opposed to "one of the tribe of Judah," but this is already historically understood to be the case. Israel became "Samaria," and Jews made the same claims about Samaritans White nationalists clinging to Christianity make about Jews: they are mixed people and do not follow the original religion. That brings me to…

>Jews in the Bible are actually Edomites.

Then why does it call them "Jews" and not "Edomites?" Why is this ethnic distinction never made clear? Why is there never an aside like, "Yes, we disciples of Christ are the real Jews, while these other Jews are actually sons of Edom"? Also, Edom was the brother of Israel. Edomite religion/culture could not have been that wildly different from Israelite religion/culture, and, if it was, it was because (according to the Bible narrative) Israelites underwent 400 years of Egyptian influence. If anything, one could argue Israelites/Jews are not the true Hebrews.

>Rev 2:9 says Jews are not really Jews.

No, what it says is that there are those who claim to be Jews but are actually the synagogue of Satan. The only way you could apply this to modern Jews is if you already believe in Christian prophecy or believe the Jews of today are the Jews of the Bible. In either case, this isn't saying "Jews aren't really Jews" but that there are people pretending to be Jews who are not. It goes out of the way to say this, where every other mention of "Jew" in the New Testament does not, so we can assume all those Jews were real Jews, not "the synagogue of Satan." Even if you do apply this to Jews (as some dynamic translations have), it simply means those Jews were being bad Jews, as opposed to Christians, who are good Jews. The Amplified Bible inserts the aside "they are Jews only by blood, and do not believe and truly honor the God whom they claim to worship." Well, it's the blood I'm concerned about. [Also, pretty ironic they would insert that into Revelation, considering what Rev 22:18 says.]

>Europeans are the lost tribes of Israel.

To believe this, you'd have to believe every single Israelite abandoned their mother tongue of Hebrew and their religion, that the Bible narrative is totally wrong, or that archaeology is totally wrong. Everywhere Jews are today, it is obvious they are Jews, and many Jews were scattered around the world on about the same timeline as the northern tribes. ["Jews" would here cover Judahites, Benjamites, and Levites, assuming modern Jews are consistent with the tribes allegedly comprising the kingdom of Judah.] Why then would the northern tribes blend so well into European culture? One possible exception to this is one group of Scythians, who refused pork and idols. That's hard to explain. But they weren't really in Europe proper.

That's about all I've got for now. Mostly, I wanted to rebuild my old set of images on the subject I lost.
R: 97 / I: 12

Asatru Folk Assembly

Are these guys legit?

Is there a better pagan group / path for an American in the current year?
R: 29 / I: 9
This is addressed to those who have a racial consciousness and also a reasonable awareness of the things beyond the physical world.

I have a moral question that has showed up a lot in my mind recently. On the one hand I have been convinced for years that gods, demons, magic, soul, reincarnation and any paranormal one can think of is real. Recently I have seen even a compilation of scientists throughout the last 150 years confirming it with ample evidence. This means that forces beyond human power and will exist in this Universe in a hierarchy of power and nature. This leads me to believe that the conception of good and evil outlined by an above human source is true and that there are objective values and Universal moral judgements that are always right or wrong in accord with the Whole.

On the other hand I am unable to prove what is objectively evil and good in accord with this higher power, and therefore unable to know what is right and wrong from the stand point of the Universe or God. I am forced by circumstance to engage in subjective moral systems and go with whatever is pragmatic and functional now based on the physical laws of reality:

- Will to live
- Will to power
- Race and eugenics, never ending improvement of power and beauty of my kind
- Eradication of all non-Whites as they have always been a source of decline for us and if only 2 races lived in this world, at one point they would have to compete for living space. Slavery being a racial time bomb (see every Aryan civilization ever) the only solution long term is White planet.


All those I acknowledge as "good", but I fall into a position of calling good and evil what is merely "useful", as Nietzsche said most people do. I know that one day when the Aryan civilization is ruled in accord to honor and honesty we will revitalize our connection with the Divine, and maybe we will follow an objective moral system that is in line with the Eternal Will (God), but until such a time, or a personal revelation, I am forced to have a subjective take even though I know it is very likely an incomplete moral system. I will do my duty as a White man without hesitation or paralysis of action but I am wondering about other people's perspective on this.

For reference, I lean spiritually on the Vedic ways, I love the Bhagavad Gita.

Anyone else feels that their moral system is at the crossroads between the Whole (objective) and themselves (subjective)? Has anyone reconciled this?
R: 4 / I: 0
If Jesus was just a normal guy, and didn't do any miracles or raise from the dead, etc, I would believe in him. Because that's actually a believable story.
R: 57 / I: 19

Walhalla - A temple of ancestor & hero veneration

I wanted to share this neat German temple with you.

It is a temple for venerating national heroes, sort of like an earthy Valhalla, after which it was named. A hall of honor which only significant national figures gain entry to.

Its construction was ordered by Ludwig I. the king of Bavaria, and sketched by the Architect Leo von Klenze. Construction went on between 1816 and 1842.

The people who are immortalized in this temple are represented by busts which were sculpted to resemble their face.

Among the people in the hall are:

>Karl the Great

A germanic king

>Gaius Julius Civili

A Germanic war-hero who fought against Roman occupation

>Anton Bruckner

German musician

We need more of this sort of thing. What do you guys think?
R: 9 / I: 1

Rituals and Magic

As we all know jews have been awfully successful with their plans over the last centuries. Is it possible their rituals and magic have played a significant role in manifesting their 'prophecies'?

For example, on the last day of the week (Saturday), jews do not do any work, which is symbolic for the age after the end times in which jews believe they will have inherited the earth and only their goyim slaves have to work. There are other examples of such rites but none come to mind right now.

Could we also employ such symbolic rituals to manifest Total Aryan Victory?
R: 13 / I: 0

The failings of Liberal Democracy

What is tolerance, but the distrust in one's own ideals?

The following is a critique of liberal democracy. I will purposefully forego talking about the jewish question, because the jewish element was not solely responsible for liberal democracy, many Whites have engaged in this system with good faith over the years and I would just be beating a dead horse. This will be about the concept of liberal democracy as an isolated construct.

The idea behind liberal democracy is to allow multiple parties to contend for power over the state through elections. Fundamentally, it is categorized by the unwillingness of the state's creators to exercise the power they wield. Afterall, their ideological enemies must have an equal oppurtunity to gain political power as them. Eventually liberal democracy results in the creation of a multitude of parties, all representing different worldviews, oftentimes not even having a unity of worldview within party boundaries. This begs the question:

>What is the purpose of a liberal democracy?

Fundamentally, it has no inherent purpose. The purpose is subject to debate by the competing parties. Some parties will want to secure the nation's future, others will want to abolish national borders. Political debates on particular issues between two (or more) groups with conflicting interests are pointless. Liberal democracy is like a car in which the driver and the passengers are constantly fighting over the wheel, without anyone having declared the destination before the ride. How can one argue against abortion based on the sanctity of life if one's opponent is a misanthrope? He will simply not care for the "sanctity of life", just like we aren't swayed by the self-inflicted suffering of foreigners, when people aim to make us want to help them.

The idea that politics and religion are separate concepts is one that arose from the seperation of state and church. The then-nominally Christian states wanted to rid themselves of the church's influence in their country, for one reason or another. The church, which was a specifically Christian political institution, being removed from its political power would have sparked outrage among Christians, which is why they have been portrayed as entirely different spheres. Religion became a personal affair and started to be seen as purely spiritual in nature, removing it from the broader concept of a worldview. I.e. the separation of politics and religion was a forced meme to remove an international, subversive element, the church, from the government.

Truly however, religion and politics cannot be seperated. A religion is simply a worldview whose moral code can be traced down to its root, that being the god-concept. Veganism, as in the philosphy, rather than the diet, is a worldview which states that the suffering of animals should be mitigated as much as possible within reason. According to the definitions used for this post veganism isn't a religion, because vegans cannot explain why suffering should be mitigated, nor what "within reason" means. The worldview simply does not reach far enough. As most vegans are atheists, they will not argue that God wants people to not eat meat, which would be a more satisfying answer as God is as far as we can go in contextualizing the universe. Even stating that their worldview stems from a disbelief in God would be a satisfying explanation, but that doesn't logically transfer to veganism either, nor do they claim it does. They claim objective moral superiority without even believing such a thing exists.

Now, under a National Socialist government, a christian theocracy or communist regime, there is no seperation of religion and politics. All of these ideologies lay out a clear path to follow. Despite the differing levels of kikedness these worldviews have, they all share a common benefit over liberal democracy. They do not allow arguments that are outside of the worldview. Not every National Socialist, christian or communist agrees with the members of his ingroup on every issue, but they do share the same moral framework from which their opinions on specific issues are derived. No one can advocate for allowing racial strangers to migrate into the country under NS rule, instead politicians can debate the best possible way of achieving NS goals and can articulate their position from the same framework as their colleagues. This could be any issue such as how to allocate taxes, or how drastic eugenic measures should be. Imagine a car in which the driver knows the destination and the passengers, with a map in hand, suggest the best possible path to take.

(Video unrelated)
R: 4 / I: 2

The fatal flaw of 99,99+% of spirituality related stuff

The goal of all of these is to improve your mind/psyche/soul/spirit/heart, but the way they go about it is stupid, and cannot lead to any thorough change.
Proof of this, is that physiognomic analysis is real (look at any article about arrested antifa members that has mugshots), and the identical twins raised apart not only look the same, but also have very similar personalities and problem (smoking speech defect bad at math etc).
Also lets say you try dry fasting and you become very irritable and get an unpleasant dry hot feeling in the body, what is the solution?
The standard recommendations of almost all modern teachings are to do something mental to improve your mental state, if you are angry try to relax deep breath visualize bla bla bla… Does it work? A little bit, sure, but it doesn’t have any impact on the root of the problem, you need to drink water.
Also as you probably already knew, gut bacteria, heavy metals, hormones, oxidative stress, deficiencies of minerals and vitamins etc. are known in alternative health circles to be huge factor in mental illnesses.
What I am getting at is that even if you are not aiming for big qualitative improvement, but just want to improve peoples morality, focus, clarity of perception, make them have stably good mood and positive attitude (correctly without being stupid about it), emotional stability etc. then the only way to do it is with a method that very greatly and thoroughly improves health, and for a really big change you need to be able to change congenital characteristics.
Another thing, is that people weaken throughout life, and peoples spirits weaken alongside their vitality, you might say that during NDEs people report feeling ok, but I think its reasonable to assume that that’s just the result of the rush from the boy instinctively spending its reserves in an attempt to not die, like when running away from a bear or bungee jumping or taking an ice bath, and since the spirit is connected to the body they feel okay despite being almost dead.
However if you really die you are no longer connected to the body and there are no reserves.
This is view is backed up by, among other things the views of the ancient Greeks see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pneuma
Similarly, the Russian word for breathing is дыхание and the word for spirit is дух
See: https://dzen.ru/media/istoki_slova/chto-anglichaninu-vozduh-to-russkomu-von-dushevnaia-etimologiia-5d94d007433ecc00b02a6c71?utm_referer=www.google.com
A random website from the search results about this.
So its reasonable to assume that all your progress, or almost all of it, is lost after death, and whatever the case may be, at the very least you cannot have certainty that it will be anything good. Also people like to cope and belive good things will happen even if they haven’t achieved much so you cannot just trust some text that says it will be good, also think logically, if people reincarnate why is sacrificing food to ancestors so common?
So the methods of a true properly preserved tradition must lead to immortality and the main thing should be the body and pneuma with the mind changing mostly as a result of those, though focused work on character improvement can be an auxiliary thing.
R: 148 / I: 14

Please explain how Christianity is not Jewish

Pic rel. I want to believe, but I can't. Every time I look at the Bible I see jewry. I've seen/read/heard various STATEMENTS disputing the idea that Christianity is Jewish. But I've yet to come across an EXPLANATION. Christbros please convince.
R: 19 / I: 3

What to do witch churches?

Picture this: /ourguys/ have secured power and all things are going well. A couple generations later Christianity got progressively less relevant and churches are empty. What would we do with them? A lot of them are quite aesthetically pleasing so I would obviously be against tearing them down but what is there to do with them? Some of the really extravagant ones can be used as tourist attractions but the others? Is there some practical use for them that doesn't degrade them?
R: 18 / I: 5

I threw my bible away

I threw my bible away and suddenly I started getting noticed by good people. I started healing internally and Nature's true beauty was shown to me. I got out of the city entirely. I think there are evil things in christianity frens. All the priests and churches pretend to be good but are actually the true evil. All people I have met in churches are really some of the worst people I have ever known. Controlling, manipulative and always wanting to enforce this alien thing on me. It never felt right. I feel it in my bones frens not to trust them. I will never let my children near them.

I want to feel closer to Nature and have thrown off the religion.

I am far happier now and things have really started going well for me. I have my own business now, I met the love of my life. And we are building a home. I saw the birth of my first son, and I swear he has the reincarnation knowledge of an Ancient warrior. I am telling him about all the old European mythologies. He says he wants to be as strong as Thor one day, and has already started picking up my dumbbells. I can't wait to see what kind of man he turns out to be. If anything he is going to be a Chad. I live out in Nature now and I can really feel the deep connection to the land. I'm never going back to the manipalitive sob's of the church. I have joined an Asatru group and all the people are really strong self reliant Nature types that will survive in a shtf situation. They have told me many things that I wish I had known long ago. They are not controlling nor manipulative but encourage self-reliance. I feel like I am free for the first time in my life.
My Ancestors are on my side. I think that a lot of the paranormal stuff is a result of ancestors being enraged that their descendants don't know their own indigenous traditions. Big if true.
R: 8 / I: 0

Asatru Amish

Imagine having a small group, 50 to 100 acres of land, and living like the Amish except instead of Protestantism, the faith is Asatru, could this be a working plan?
R: 2 / I: 0
These guys are fucked. No-one talks about them, they're already on their way out and this should probably be on /biz/. They prey on the vulnerable, tear families apart, believe in wacky shit, but I almost have to admire them, because I've never heard of another organisation that has managed to jew so much money from literal jews. Leah Remini, a jewess had to pay a million easy to reach OT whatever the fuck it is. The one where you're told that little spirits are all over you and you have to audit them and set them free. Her mom was in the room when she got this information, so who knows how much money they jewed outta her? I don't know of any other Scientology jews, but I'm assuming that there is or was more than a few. I mean, shit. Gotta give the devil his jews.
R: 13 / I: 10

An Introduction to the Greek Myths

From The Mythology Handbook by Hestia Evans.
R: 12 / I: 5

The fucking madness of the world is getting to me


>Coworker: Shipping costs should actually go up because people should be forced to cover their negative environmental impact for buying overseas and not locally.


Fuck you. My parts aren't made locally dumb fuck.

>Log into customs declaration service online to do the declaration

>Sorry you cannot do a declaration for this package because the shipper has designated that they are doing the declaration on your behalf. Please contact them.

But I never fucking told them to do it on my behalf!

>UPS: Pay us $20 to declare your package (literally 36% of the cost of the entire package) and no we won't let you declare it yourself which you could do in 5 seconds for free. For this we need your personal information like Passport number. If you don't comply we'll send it back in 5 days.


Fuck you, you fucking cunts. It's MY fucking package. Why should I have to pay you to do customs declaration on my behalf you dogs? I can do it myself you cunts without needing to give my personal data to anyone.

>Sony raises the costs of all PS Plus tiers by 40% whilst offering no improvement in any of them whatsoever


The whole fucking community rips itself to shit over this with people being told to just "suck it up" like this isn't a fucking joke. Already paid $550 and waited almost 1 year for the console. Just to get raped by $135 yearly costs for PS Plus are you fucking kidding? 90s kids would have raged and sold their consoles. Now we have fucking faggot zoomers whose parents are paying for them to tell us to keep sucking Sony's dick.

>Try to download an .exe file via Chrome

>Blocked
>Try to download an .exe file with Browsing Protection turned off in Chrome
>Blocked

Fucking GOODBYE Chrome. You've overstepped one last time.

>Go to download an image from a website

>It's fucking .webp format which NOTHING still supports

What the fuck is happening to this world. This is literally hell on earth. I want off immediately. No wonder people are shooting each other.
R: 208 / I: 61

Paganism Learning General /PLG/

I should not be the one to start this general, but we need a general like this. European paganism is very broad, evolved a bit in itself and became regionally distinct, and it suffered greatly from war, Romanization and Christianity. I am trying to focus my studies on paganism of France, Belgium, and Switzerland and have found learning about this area in particular is very challenging due to there strong Romanization then alliance with Catholicism. Other pagan regions have issues in study as well - "Celtic" was way more than Ireland and modern books are influenced by Wicca and the new concepts they push, Norse mythology is having its image attacked via pop-culture and media (they now have trannies! expert approved!).

Right so here is a general where we can talk about paganism in a way that people can learn about it. Basic concepts and philosophies. Mythology. Proto-pantheon. Regional festivals with large significance. All stuff for generally learning paganism.
R: 7 / I: 3

Judeolatry - Jewish Idol Worship

Abrahamic religions, including Atheism, Communism, Capitalism and Zionism as they are Jewish/Talmudic in origin, are all guilty of idol worship. They not only refuse to educate Gentiles on God and nature, but hide knowledge from humanity. Historically the Jews have hidden their knowledge, which they stole from Egypt, in parables. Historically the Catholic Church has hidden their Bible from their flock by protecting literacy and refusing to make their people literate.

During the European Renaissance Age, after the Judeo-Christian Dark Ages, Nordic men began freeing the Gentile mind from Jewish poison, teaching them of human rights, natural law, and literacy. To combat the new anti-Semitic Renaissance and the return of Nordic-Gentile values, Jews released several ideologies which serve as controlled opposition for Abrahamic religions.

The Atheist, Communist, and Capitalist position themselves as anti-religious, but this is only because they intend to replace religion with Hollywood or Zionist propaganda, further promoting the same Jewish idolatry. In fact, although Atheists claim not to believe in Abrahamic religions, they believe in all of the axioms of it. They believe in Moses, in Adam and Eve, in the fictional story of Jews as slaves of Egypt, in the fictional stories of German and Roman, or otherwise European or Nordic oppression, and more. Since these philosophies are also Jewish in origin, and reaffirm the purpose of Judaism, which is the worship of the Jewish race, we conclude that Atheism, Communism, Capitalism and Zionism are a branch of Abrahamic religions specifically tailored towards Gentiles that are viewed by Jews as unworthy to know about God.

Since ancient Egypt, the Jews have been the single most prosperous, profitable, protected, privileged, and powerful people on the planet and it isn't even close. They were never slaves in Egypt, but they were in fact wealthy priests who eclipsed the Pharaoh in power by the end of the Egyptian New Kingdom, causing its collapse. The Cohens of Amen, who controlled the majority of Egypt's temples, ships, and wealth, usurped the Egyptian population and thence came the Jewish last-name Cohen and the curious invocation of Amen (a Pagan Egyptian God) and not El or Yahweh in Abrahamic prayers.

The Jews were not oppressed by Rome or the Greeks, but in fact used their wealthy religion to usurp Rome as well. The assassination of Julius Caesar, and Caesarian wars are related to this Jewish usury, and Ptolemy, the enemy of Julius Caesar, was the Roman General who responded to the Jews' pleading to make them a part of Rome. After which, the Jews resented Rome for Romanizing some of their Jewish population, and committed genocides against the Roman population, sparking the Roman-Jewish wars. Eventually, Christianity was written by Saul of Tarsus, who adopted the name Paul the Apostle, and this religion of Jewish origin was used like Marxism and Communism, Atheism and Capitalism, to pacify a civilization that had just gained a newfound consciousness of Jewish culture and of the Nordic origins of human rights.

After nearly 1000 years of enduring White Genocide, Nordic Gentiles in Europe temporarily overthrew the Pope, and the Jewish Banking Monopoly in Europe and created a Renaissance Age so glorious not even the Christians could resist taking part and pride in it. From here the Jews responded with their Atheist controlled opposition, leading to the second European Renaissance: National Socialism.

Indeed, it was Nordic White Gentiles who are responsible for all of the human rights advancements, Golden Ages and Renaissance Ages, whereas the advent of Jewish idolatry and idolatry can be rightfully pointed to as the advent of a Dark Age or a societal Collapse. It is no mystery why Judaism coincides with the Bronze Age Collapse, or why Christianity coincides with the Dark Ages, or why Communism coincides with the Zionist Dark Ages and the European World Wars.

A cultural decline is most easily explained by the demographic decline of the people groups responsible for creating those cultures. We live in a Dark Age today, because our people and our culture is silence and oppressed by a foreign people and foreign culture who historically have committed genocides and acts of terrorism so unimaginable that most Gentiles, while seeing and living through all of the negative effects of them, remain stagnantly unaware of them.

The censorship of the ethnic interests of White, Nordic, Gentiles is the product of a disgusting and hateful cult, with many sects, whose aim it is to produce an all-encompasing and inescapable religion of Jewish idol worship. From Hollywood, to Abrahamism, to Zionism, Capitalism, and Communism, where is the religion that truly worships God and not Jews as the chosen people of God? Where is the Jew or Christian who will say, "any man could have been Christ" or "any Gentile could have been as successful as the Jews"? They do not exist, for to insinuate that Gentile man is equal to Jewish man is a great heresy for the believers of this parasitical pseudo-philosophy.
R: 3 / I: 0

I dealing with darkness right now

Almost all of my thoughts are self depricative or about harming others. I legitimately do not believe that anyone is capable of being kind to one another. It’s like humans evolved with a “might make right” mindset rather than one of empathy (which makes sense). The thought of hurting others is the only thing that brings Joy to me. How do I fix my fucked up self?
R: 4 / I: 2

Jupiter thread?

Why do I read about the elites worshipping Jupiter?

How do I worship Jupiter?
R: 2 / I: 2
>>306
We must return to our roots!

Odin (/ˈoʊdɪn/;[1] from Old Norse: Óðinn, IPA: [ˈoːðinː]) is a widely revered god in Germanic mythology. In Norse mythology, from which stems most surviving information about the god, Odin is associated with wisdom, healing, death, royalty, the gallows, knowledge, war, battle, victory, sorcery, poetry, frenzy, and the runic alphabet, and is the husband of the goddess Frigg. In wider Germanic mythology and paganism, the god was known in Old English as Wōden, in Old Saxon as Wōdan, and in Old High German as Wuotan.

https://archive.org/details/annette-lassen-odins-ways-a-guide-to-the-pagan-god-in-medieval-literature-routledge-2021

This book is about the Old Norse god Odin. It includes references to all occurrences of Odin in the Old Norse/Icelandic texts, including Saxo’s Gesta Danorum, the eddic poems, Snorri’s Edda, and Ynglinga saga and analyses the high medieval reception and literary representations of Odin.

This is the only existing study of Odin in all the Old Norse/Icelandic texts and applies a contextual method: the different guises of Odin are studied on the basis of the various textual contexts and on their background in the literary and Christian intellectual milieu of the time. Contrary to existing studies, this method is non-reductive in that it does not aim at providing a synthesis about Odin’s original nature on the basis of the differing textual uses of Odin in the Middle Ages.

The One Eyed God Odin And The ( Indo ) Germanic Männerbünde
https://archive.org/details/journal-of-indo-european-studies-monograph-series-36-kris-kershaw-the-one-eyed-g

The Ancient Religion Of The Sun. The Wisdom Bringers And The Lost Civilization Of The Sun.
https://archive.org/details/lara-atwood-the-ancient-religion-of-the-sun.-the-wisdom-bringers-and-the-lost-ci

On Wotan
https://archive.org/details/carl-jung-on-wotan_20230629
It seems to me that Wotan hits the mark as an hypothesis. Apparently he
really was only asleep in the Kyffhauser mountain until the ravens called him and
announced the break of day. He is a fundamental attribute of the German psyche,
an irrational psychic factor which acts on the high pressure of civilization like a
cyclone and blows it away. Despite their crankiness, the Wotan-worshippers seem
to have judged things more correctly than the worshippers of reason. Apparently
everyone had forgotten that Wotan isa Germanic datum of first importance, the
truest expression and unsurpassed personification of a fundamental quality that is
particularly characteristic of the Germans.


In his poem To the Unknown God, Nietzsche had written:

"I shall and will know thee, Unknown One,
Who searchest out the depths of my soul,
And blowest through my life like a storm,
Ungraspable, and yet my kinsman!
I shall and will know thee, and serve thee."
R: 55 / I: 53

Aesthetic Pagan Images

Post your best pagan images
R: 28 / I: 4

Tengrism

What are some resources to learn about Tengrism/Mongolian Shamanism? E.g. theology, practices, priesthood, ect.
R: 7 / I: 0

Positive Christianity

Is it even worth it to create a "positive Christianity"? Christianity is a jewish-made religion to destroy the Aryan race and if we acknowledge that reality it'd be awkward to promote an Aryanized version of it rather than just letting it rot altogether.

Catholicism has a lot of neat European elements and some parts of the Bible likely originally stem from European myths and sagas. There are also passages like "love thy neighbor" which could be seen as a commandment to love your race and one could make a translation of the Bible that highlights the positive elements while weakening the negative ones, but… Would that even be worth it? In your answer please disregard resources like time because realistically this project would need to be undertaken by a powerful institution like a government anyway, so lies in the future rather than the present. Also feel free to discuss positive Christianity in general ITT even if you don't respond to my question.
R: 14 / I: 3

Role of race/ethnicity in religion?

Does having a different race, ethnicity, genetics, skin color, eye color, hair color etc have any effects on religion and it’s effects on you?
Does it determine what gods you should worship and how they will treat you?

And truth to this thread here? https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/32717063/#32717063

Are his eyes indicative of him being white? Does semen retention “bless” you?
R: 151 / I: 23

Any religion would've Rotted

The perfectly designed Aryanist religion wouldn't have been much better than Christianity.

Anti-christian thinking goes like this
> the one true contextless interpretation of Christianity is …, therefore Christianity necessarily makes people …

But Christianity was fine in the past so this misses the real reason why things have gone bad
> evolutionary pressures

Let's take a lesson from breading laying hens. Say there are 6 hens per cage, and two strategies for selecting the next generation.

1. Select one hen from each cage that laid the most eggs. (individual selection)
2. Select the group (cage) of the hens with the best egg production. (group selection)

Strategy 1 is a disaster, egg production plummets over the generations. You get a bunch of psychopath hens that peck their neighbours off laying (behaviour bad for the group). Strategy 2 results in altruistic hens that engage in behaviours that increase the egg production of their neighbours (good for the group).

We have been under individual selection since 1900. It's not just Christianity that has rotted (doing bad things to the group). Every aspect of civilization has rotted. These evolutionary pressures are like gravity, you're not able to resist them. The only thing to do is get out of the pull.

Find refugia where groups are still under group-selection (armish/mennonites/FLDS). The Christianity(old-testament) has a proven track record for producing successful ctw groups, while NatSoc cant even figure out that ctw groups need to be quiverfull to have any chance of survival
> stopping at 4 children will mean a TFR <=3 for a movement with terrible evangelical prospects

NatSoc needs to learn about group-selection to move from idealistic to pragmatic. Here are clips I made of the livestreams I learned this from:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ooe2L9HlIuk&list=PL-BEg5izsga1FPZrYiBUNsBeaxn4oyMz-&index=208
R: 95 / I: 19

Unique to Christianity

It's the only religion in the world that sends young girls to African tribes to love the tribes people (niggers). No one explains it in debate threads.

I has to be a cuckold fetish disguised as virtue. This was confirmed when I was looking for ammo to post as evidence and came across a blog documenting sending their daughters to an African tribe. The comment section literally read like a cuckold fetish post on 4chan.

"Prayers are working! Lots of wonderful things happening….

Enjoyed seeing granddaughter Lauren W.'s photo in which she was practicing to be the mother of triplets!! Precious babies!"

http://tcamissionafrica.blogspot.com/2010/06/day-6-wed-june-16.html?m=1

This isn't an isolated case either. It's fundamental to Christianity.

It's so weak and unnatural. Identical to white genocide cuckold fetish. It has to be the same types of people.

We need religion and God. But not Christianity.
R: 10 / I: 3

Silmarillion General

Christianity haters, I would like to hear your views on the Silmarillion. On the surface I'm a degenerate darwinist, but deep down I'm a Tolkien fundamentalist. Evangelicals, and Pagans, did you just say something that contradicts Tolkien, HERESY! You'll all burn in hell. I'm still burning deep down from when the pastor made me say brown people can go to heaven.

I see it as Tolkien writing jews out of Christianity and Aryans into it; The Silmarillion is replacement for the historical books of the old testament. Makes me think Tolkien had some of Fëanor's foresight:

>‘The Light of the Trees has passed away, and lives now only in the Silmarils of Fëanor. Foresighted was he! Even for those who are mightiest under Ilúvatar there is some work that they may accomplish once, and once only.


Its a proof of concept for the scripture that we should had underlying the historical traditions/practices that made up Christianity (although it seems you consider these totally evil).

Also please post your favourite moments.
R: 69 / I: 28

Christianity is subversive.

I have been looking into the local pre-christian religion, thanks to christians it is almost impossible to find anything of the old faith, however oral traditions have preserved stories agaist all ods.
This being the caucasus, it is a moshpit of wars, faiths and people, this creates a moshpit of faith where, surprise to nobody, the local faith is a fever mixture of various faiths.
For example, our creation myth is that of fire and water mixing and creating the chaos that in term forms the realms which is simular to norse myth of niflheim and muspelheim making the world, there is also element of the 9 skies which is never clear if it means 9 other worlds or something else due to presense of 4 destinct realms, which is the realm, the realm below, the realm above and beyond realm all interconnected by a tree. From the chaos emerges the: Morige xmerti. I can not for the life of me tell if he was the true overgod or was it another diety called Armaz, which is remarkably simular to Zoroastrian diety Ormazd or Ahura mazda, they even have the same attributes of elderly male diety of light, order, wisdom, tho unlike the zoroastian religion, there is no ahriman, instead its the overgods sister who for the lack of better term, is a bitch, who gets cursed and now toils endlessly to ruin gods plans and designs out of spite.
The overgod had many children, at first they are the typical demigods and great heroes, one of which is Amiran, a carbon copy version of Prometeus, a greek myth, the further down you go, the more odd these creatures are, as in, they follow the local mentality, culture and behavioural patterns, however as you go further into the future more semitic parts start to sneak in, a myth of the poisoned fruit given to the first human for example, however unlike the adam and eve story, this one features a poison apple given to the first human by a sneaky evil spirit. Figure of Christ starts appearing in later legends as one of the children of the god, slowly the Christ figure goes from one of many kids of god to the only son of god, the rest are just blessed humans. The realm idea mentioned before, is converted into christian cosmology, the realm is now earth, the realm above is replaced with heaven, the realm below is replaced with hell and beyond realm is forgotten alltogether.
The Georgian/Caucasian pre-christian faith is nothing grand like greek or as marketable as norse, but it is an interesting moshpit of faiths which reflects the geography, but what it has is a clear timeline of Christian tampering, the many heroic demigods that exemplified strenght, courage and power are replaced with tame and peaceful image of christ. The overgod who was also depicted as a war god, despite all the positive attributes, hated weakness and fear, you only had his favor is you proved it. He was replaced with Cemitic god that loves everyone and all you have to do is just believe in him.
It is a clear timeline of going from a strengh based faith of the region, which had first human settlements nearly 2 milion years ago to modern-ish existance and more meek and tame beliefs of forgiveness. And it shows, where the acncients somehow kept themselfs going for milenia, but after 2000 years of christianity they have been domesticated and turned into shabbos goy, i have no faith that this country will make it to the 2050, let alone 22th century.
Semitic religions are there to domesticate you, find your old gods, they served your ancestors for longer than the domesticating jewish god that turns you into sheep for the slaughterhouse. Christian religion is very out of place for this region, even as a child i found it odd how forgiving we are despite being surrounded by hostiles, turning the other cheek is all nice and well but not when you are surrounded by enemies from all sides in an inhospitable terrain.
R: 25 / I: 3

Is Christianity the cause of Atheism?

Every religion has incredible tales of its heroes doing supernatural feats and has gods doing impossible deeds.

In Greek mythology, Zeus defeats the titan Cronus, who is his father.

Odin rides a six legged horse across the sky

And Jesus ctrl+c's and ctrl+v's food and walks on water.

Obviously none of these stories are believable and there is no proof of any of them actually happening. The difference is, however that Christianity is the only one of them which demands you take the story literal and believe it actually happened like this.

Once people were allowed to read the bible themselves and were able to discover new things about the world through scientific breakthroughs, such as heliocentrism, they started to realize Christianity does not make sense.

But with Christians having eradicated Europe's native beliefs, people had to connection to them anymore. They looked at the old sagas and thought to themselves

"this is just as ridiculous as the biblical stories! How were people stupid enough to believe this?"

The symbology and metaphor is thus lost on them, due to the brainwashing Christianity did to them. Thus, they become atheists.
R: 14 / I: 2

Homer, Christianity and European Spirituality

HOMER:
The best book on pagan religion is https://www.amazon.com/Sexual-Personae-Decadence-Nefertiti-Dickinson/dp/0679735798/ Paglia argues that to be "western" is to be Apollonian (she also erases all traces of Christianity (including Tolkien) from the last 2000 years of European history).

>The hardest object of Apollonian thing-making is western personality, the glamourous, striving, separatist ego that entered literature in the Iliad


>The Oresteia recapitulates history, moving from nature to society, from chaos to order, from emotion to reason, from revenge to justice, from female to male.


Paglia really gets the metaphysics of the Iliad (European spirituality) right. Man is extraterrestrial (Olympian). Nature is disgusting. The highest value is being in this parallel existence to nature. When soldiers in the Iliad feel fear, Homer immediately kills them off. He has no tolerance for those contaminated by nature. (This is why I'm sceptical about the AFA. They seem druidic rather than Olympian)

It is a spiritual kingdom on earth Homer is building, outside of the influence of nature. Soldiers are filled with the spirit of God, and then proceed to perform heroic feats. There is a straight line between the Charismatic/Pentecostal Christianity and the Iliad (which was the bible of Greek civilization). Bart Ehrman says prior to Christianity the suspicious-crazies went to the pagan temples for healing and exorcisms. This spirituality of the suspicious-crazies is a European spirituality that has been enshrined in the synoptic gospels (and acts) by the miracles of Jesus. Watch Derek Prince to understand this spirituality.

Paglia also claims that saviours are uniquely western. Hector is the saviour of Troy. Achilles of the Greek army. Western stories are about saviours. Jesus preaching passivism and getting killed for it, is a massive subversion of the Homeric saviour, but the lack of valour of the death is just a detail. God sending Christ, his only son down to earth to die valiantly for us is uniquely European. Constantinian Christianity conflated Christ and Apollo, virtue ethics are exalted as apollonian separatism from nature.

STOICISM:
Stoicism appeared after the Roman conquest of Greece, at time when Homer's Achillian virtue ethic had become no longer viable, instead proposing a new ethic of letting go what you cant control. This European philosophy seems to be a big influence of apocalyptic Judaism (i.e. John the Baptist and Jesus). Jesus taught an excessive stoic virtue ethic, and had a heavenly father that takes care of you (Zeus not Yahweh btw). It seems that Stoicism was reformulated by jews into a fundamentalist form that had wider appeal than just European autists. It's clear that the new testament was written against Homer, and NatSocs Reeee about this (past me included), but this stoic element of Christianity was intended to be to be adaptive for Europeans, and perhaps Homer (i.e. Siege Kulture) is maladaptive.

RABBI PAUL:
At the time of Jesus, society was degenerating (high individual level selection)
>>>r/8171
but pharisaical jews where quite immune, with their strict morals, and community structure. Greeks wanted what they had and and so Paul sold it to them https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aOpjTgnpjaA
Paul was a philo-hellen, who basically replicated, for Greeks, the superior social model of the Pharisees. This model is superior. The cultural transmission (copying scripture) is superior (it's sad that Christian canon isn't open so as too preserve anglo culture/history and so we'll only be left with Hellen/Israelite). The pulpit filling people's heads with ideas is superior to pagan/catholic rituals (jew media replaced the pulpit after the 1970s). Group singing is fantastic at binding groups together.

In my opinion Paul is the biggest jewish traitor of all time. He is hated by modern Christians (exposing their unrighteousness). His epistles enshrined the practices of European patriarchy (i.e. head coverings) in scripture and added persecution of sodomites to European culture.

NEW TESTAMENT:
Only half of Paul's letters are actually written by him and these are euro-friendly.

Peter's epistles and the letter's of Paul not written by him are euro-centric, addressing the problems Christian's faced in a homogenous context. Hebrews addresses how the old and new testaments relate, teaching European superscessionism.

Likewise the synoptic gospels (Mathew, Mark) are anti-semitic: only Europeans are presented in a positive light. Luke (and Acts) draws from the same oral culture but he was the first "white liberal" and does his best to revise his material for the worst.

The Gospel and epistles of John are not distinctly European and are generically Christian. But Revelation is where everything goes wrong. It's a Jewish supremist manifesto. Revelation is where all the aspects of modern evangelicalism that weren't in Reformed Protestantism come from. There's no place for this book in White Christianity.

CONCLUSION:
I encourage everyone to read the Silmarillion, and then interpret Christianity through its lens. Christianity has been massively subverted, but religions don't appear out of nowhere. They have always iterate on their predecessors (Buddhism, Christianity, Rabbinical, Islam, Mormonism). Homer preserves early Greek spirituality/religion. The New Testament late Greek spirituality/philosophy. Pagans should at least adopt the Iliad as scripture (and call themselves Olympians/Apollonians) instead of converting to nature-worship adjacent cultic practices (AFA).
R: 78 / I: 51

/r/ Meme Generator

ITT we post ideas for memes for others to make and any OC we make.
We also discuss how best to spread a wholesome and holistic /r/ worldview through memes. Who do we target, and how?
>We wuz jewies
>Salvation is of the jews
>Irreligious /pol/tards
>Atheist hedonists
>Radical commies
>Vegan cat-ladies
>etc.
R: 11 / I: 3

The false dichotomy

>Be Nefarious
>Well-produced film that condemns the cultural Marxist movement as evil (vidrel)
>A certain group is behind all of it secretly
>Said group wants to destroy us and inverts our morality
>It's the j… It's the demons.
>Demons do it because they hate God/Christ
>Hell is real, be afraid
>Only Christ can save us
>Produced by Cary Solomon and Chuck Konzelman
Why do people with such last names produces Christian movies?

https://fmovies.to/movie/nefarious2-82rpq
R: 13 / I: 6

Resources on Mythology

Good morning frens

I am a Christian and I’ve been working through my shit, healing wounds, becoming more free through warfare that I’ve learned through years of walking through it and now I’m noticing patterns and starting to suspect that there is a demon that has been operating generationally through my family.
I’m having a hard time naming this demon and I wonder if the answer lies in the “heroes of old and men of renoun.” So, I know this is not a request board, but I am wondering if anyone here can point me in the right direction to where I can learn more about mythology and specifically of the Greek/roman variety. Specifically I would like to know how these dieties were worshipped. I am willing to buy books and/or do some digging about this. For my Christian bothers here, have some wallpapers.
Thank you for all your help anons

tl;dr: I want to learn about mythology, and don’t know where to start. I am looking for resources that go deeper than Wikipedia articles.
R: 35 / I: 27

The Secret Kept Hidden From Gentiles

The Secret Kept Hidden From Gentiles

The secret kept hidden from Gentiles, is long, controversial, and requires much pre-requisite knowledge. However once you are given the key, everything else falls into place.

Jewish prophets lied for profit. Judaism is idolatry. There was once an Aryan culture that had conquered nearly the whole world, whose priest class developed a view of the world which today has been passed down only through parable and secret doctrine. There are three main aspects to the secret kept hidden from Gentiles, titled as follows:
>The Rise and Fall of Man
>The Jewish Question
>The Impressions of the Invisible Radiant Creator (whose glory is too great for any man to lay their naked eye upon)

A brief and broad chronology of the world's major eras are given here:
>c. 10,000 B.C. to c. 4,000 B.C. (Ancient Aryan Ascetic Age)
>c. 4,000 B.C., to c. 1,000 B.C. (Egyptian Monarchic Period to the Bronze Age Collapse)
>c. 1,000 B.C., to c. 1 C.E. (Hellenic Age to the Fall of Rome)
>c. 1 C.E., to c. 1440 C.E. (Christian Age to the Fall of the Church)
>c. 1440 C.E., to 2023 C.E. (The Printing Press to the Internet Age)

According to the Rise and Fall of Man, each one of these civilizations was created by a superior people group, whose superiority in culture and in health made them the leading culture during their era. These cultures then grow sinful, choosing to import cheap labor or slaves, living hedonistic and irresponsible lifestyles, until they fall from grace and another ethnic group takes power. When the new group takes power, a recension or rewrite of the previous world culture is created, in order to justify the (likely violent or usurous) circumstances that facilitated the fall. This is called recension theory.

So human culture can be observed as going through a cycle, first splitting from a degenerate or failing culture, and becoming oriented towards self-sufficiency, asceticism, and self-improvement. Next, these cultures war for power, and the healthiest and smartest ethnic group wins, recenses the culture to move it towards their own goals, and to justify their goals. For example, the modern day "Pridism" and anti-Whitism can be seen as the Jewish recension of the originally European dominant ideology of Freemasonry, Liberalism, and the Illuminati: "Equality, Fraternity, and Liberty". In our modern age, it is better put as "forced assimilation into a culture of rootless nothingness" since equality has been perverted to mean assimilation, fraternity to mean the abolishion of in-group preference, and liberty to mean the freedom of dissimilitude. In other words, the goal of this ideology is to commit global cultural genocide, and forcing all peoples to unite under a one world government and culture. This Pridism can be traced to Freemasonry, and Freemasonry to the Knights of Solomon, and the KoS to Christianity and Hellenic Judaism, and Hellenic Judaism to the original Judaism and Israelites, who were illiterate slaves and barbarians from Canaan who usurped the Egyptian priest class and stole their science after the Egyptian campaigns in the Near East.
R: 34 / I: 12
I'd like to have a serious, mature discussion about christianity, but I can't fathom why so many people buy into it other than they're scared shitless of death. I suppose the same could be said for pretty much any religion, but I was born into christianity so It's easier for me to critique and question it. Obviously there's a myriad of different christian sects who place higher importance on different things like the authority of the church vs the authority of the gospel etc, but most would agree that Jesus was crucified and died for our sins. (I don't know why it's "sins" btw, because I only know of the original sin.. that was commited by the first human woman Eve who was made out of one of Adam's rib.. Unless he was dying for all our sins in advance?) And if God is truly all powerful, and as Gabriel said "nothing is impossible to him", then why could god not just simply forgive us? Why did he have his son/himself tortured and killed for our sins? I've asked devout christians this before and they always say something like "There had to be a sacrifice." Well, why did there need to be a sacrifice? If god made everything, then he made sin, or he at least knew it would come to be presumably (everything's a big, divine plan after all). To me, it seems sadistic, masochistic and megalomaniacal all at once. Why could he not have made a perfect world with no sin at all? That's like me leaving a sweet or some chocolate out in the open and then losing my shit if a younger family member ate it and punishing them forever. The child broke two commandments after all. The child stole and coveted, so tough shit. It's my house, my rules. There's so much shit I could go onto, it'd take all day. Then there's the fact that christ shares numerous other uncanny similarities with other gods like horus, dionysus, attis, krishna with same birthdays, virgin births, raising the dead, born under a star, coming back from the dead etc etc. Also, Mathew, Mark, Luke and John wrote most of the new testament. Oftentimes, they recounted the same things about Jesus, but they differ slightly on a few things. Since the bible is god's word, did he just have a few off-days here and there? Admittedly, they all have the same, general jist of what presumably happened, but if there were some discrepancies back then, what else is fucked up about it in terms of reliability?
>inb4 it's meant to be symbolic
>inb4 the only way to btfo the jew is to worship a jew
>inb4 "but it's a sin to even question it"
>inb4 ad hominem
It's just fear of death and many years of superstitious retardation. Nothing more. Sorry to break it to you. Santa isn't real either btw.
R: 38 / I: 9

Gentile Genocide

Abrahamic religions are psychological operations and methods of propaganda designed to justify the collapse, usury, or genocide of a Gentile civilization. Some religion always appears after the fall of a civilization (Bronze Age Collapse and Judaism, Fall of Rome and Christianity, &c.) and is neither unique nor innovative, but derivative of Gentile progress. Included in the definition of "Abrahamic psyops" are, but are not limited to: Judaism, Christianity and Islam (traditional Abrahamism), Satanism, Atheism, Capitalism, Communism, and Hollywoodism (reformed, enlightenment Abrahamism). They are grouped as one because they all serve the common goal, which is to justify the collapse, usury, or genocide of a Gentile civilization.

Although these religions are extremely popular, their world view has been proven time and time again to be superstitious and unreasonable. It is designed to be difficult to reason with, or infalsifiable so that those born into the religion are incapable of deprogramming. For example, the popular belief within Abrahamic religions is that renouncing your religion will cause eternal torture and suffering in the afterlife as punishment.

Abrahamic religions also claim a holy heritage, although oddly enough, the origins of Abrahamism are found in Gentile religions, such as the Egyptian religion. Many characters in the Bible and Quran are provably ancient Egyptian gods made patriarchs as a form of "god reduction". This is proof that Judaism, Christianity, and Islam have no right to claim monotheism either, as polytheistic gods exist and are recognized as real people and not fiction, even if they are patriarchs and not gods. Similarly, Abrahamic prayers by virtue of tradition still address the Egyptian god Amen, a tradition the Cohens of Israel kept from their role as the usurpers of Egypt's priest-hood. Sometimes in religion, humans are deified, and gods undeified. Sometimes gods merge and become one, or split and become many, or take on new names or forms after contact with another culture.

This is called "Recension theory" in comparative religion and Egyptology. The idea is that worldviews are revised or rescripted when one ruling class or hegemony is replaced with another. Therefore the Egyptian religion is reworked to become early Judaism after the Bronze Age Collapse, and the Roman religion is reconciled with Judaism to become the 'Hellenic Judaism' form of early Christianity after the Fall of Rome.

Since Abrahamic religions are not legitimate attempts at science, but are propaganda, their plagiarism and worthlessness is easily provable. This thread will consist of evidence proving Abrahamic plagiarism, historical context, as well as the real scientific information and truth perverted by Abrahamic pastors so that their parasitic prophets could make a profit off of your blindness.

If you ask me, "Germany Must Perish!" by Theodore N. Kaufman is a better introduction to Abrahamic religions than the Bible.
R: 0 / I: 0

/r/ules & info

/r/ is a non-abrahamic religious board, the following rules are to be followed:

1. Christian posts belong on >>>/c/. If your post is critical of Christianity, post it here instead. It is not allowed on /c/.

2. Advertising Judaism or Islam is forbidden. You are allowed to discuss it neutrally or negatively, however.

3. No arguing in bad faith against Paganism. Do not make posts that strawman Pagans to be Wiccan, post faggots practicing a non-abrahamic religion to suggest all Pagans are gay, say "Odin drinks cum" or other bullshit. You are allowed to discuss religion as a Christian, as long as you are posting in good faith. Whether you are, lies with the discretion of the moderators.

4. Your replies should be related to the post you are replying to. No derailing.

Guidelines:

1. Do not accuse people of being a shill, jew or fed. If they are breaking the rules report them and ignore them.

2. To avoid sliding threads, check the catalog for existing threads on the topic you can post in before making a new thread. Especially if it's a one-liner or another low-quality post.

Quick links:

>The Nordic Tradition (Norse Paganism/ Germanic Paganism/ Heathenism)

>>859

>Odinism

>>739

>Asatru Folk Assembly

>>328

>Gnosticism

>>109

>Cosmotheism

>>503

>Islam

>>246

>Eastern Religions (Buddhism, Hinduism, Shinto, etc.)

>>302

>Buddhism

>>5829

>Vedic tradition

>>1152

>Atheism

>>2397

>Deism

>>5684

>National Socialism

>>6642

>Esoteric Hitlerism

>>4079

>Christianity

>>>/c/
>>2076

>Ancestor & Hero Worship

>>6226

>Post-theism/Naturalism

>>5777

>European paganism in general

>>5635

>Determinism

>>4476

>Zoroastrianism

>>206

>Animism

>>2372

>Tengrism

>>492

>Judaism

>>7699

>Satanism

>>155
R: 20 / I: 6

Are Christians manifesting jewish prophecy?

The bible essentially prophesizes that after the end times, God™'s Kingdom will descend onto the earth and a messianic world dictatorship will start.

Before this happens however, an array of other prophecies are said to need to come true, for instance the mark of the beast and the persecution of Christians.

The capital of God's kingdom would be Israel, the state of jews, who see themselves, as a race, as the priests of "Hashem" (God™) and want the goyim to follow noahide law.

Presupposing the second coming is also the fall of "Edom" who rabbis liken to Aryan civilization:
>"Edom who became Rome which became Christian civilization which became the USA…"

If these prophecies were written by jews as a playbook for world domination, and they made a large chunk of people believe these prophecies, wouldn't that then help manifest them? A collective belief of billions of people over centuries is sure to have an effect.

If we give the Bible the benefit of the doubt that it is not actually semitic, or whatever >>>/c/ believes, it should still be noted that the belief in the actual prophecies could be hijacked by creating mock-prophecies which would be both sympathetic magic and would convince Christians into believing they are the actual prophecies currently fulfilling thus destroying resistence to their antics and also having them manifest their desired goals.

Feel free to correct me on any mistakes I may have made, I am not a biblical scholar so take my statements with a grain of salt.
R: 7 / I: 1

European Amish

Would it be possible to create a community like the Amish in the densely populated Europe? I assume the answer is no, because we don't have the space that America has, but I'd like to be proven wrong.
R: 7 / I: 0
The kike religions are all dogshit and only serve to undermine whites. The old world Germanic and Greek inspired religions are fun to daydream about. But your personal religion should be something that guides your daily life and helps you interpret the world.

White Nationalism is a perfect candidate for that. It promotes strength through our people. It encourages us to celebrate our heritage and traditions. It gives us goals to work for. And it's something tangible. Through white nationalism we maintain our race. We build buildings and establish laws.

The cities built by white hands are our temples. We have a never ending abundance of art and culture. We need only ourselves. We need unity. We will secure a future for white children. And we will ensure that white people will continue to enjoy the successes we have because of the efforts of our ancestors, and the continued efforts of ourselves.

Hail Victory
White Nationalism is a perfect candidate for that. It promotes strength through our people. It encourages us to celebrate our heritage and traditions. It gives us goals to work for. And it's something tangible. Through white nationalism we maintain our race. We build buildings and establish laws.

The cities built by white hands are our temples. We have a never ending abundance of art and culture. We need only ourselves. We need unity. We will secure a future for white children. And we will ensure that white people will continue to enjoy the successes we have because of the efforts of our ancestors, and the continued efforts of ourselves.

Hail Victory
R: 247 / I: 100

The Nordic Tradition

I'm seeing a lot of bizarre takes on Nordic Tradition on this board. If anyone is interested in discussing the actual Eddas, Sagas and other ancestral Tradition, as well as more peripheral material, this thread is the place to do it. Any Indo-European input is appreciated.
For anyone new to this, the Nordic Tradition lies within the Germanic Tradition, which itself is a branch of the broader Indo-European Tradition. The Alfar, Disar, Æsir, Vanir, Jotun and so on that you've probably unfortunately become familiar with through (((Marvetflixazon))), all actually mean specific things. The trick to understanding our ancestors is to translate and decrypt what the words mean. Luckily, there have been huge advances in linguistics that can help us, and I was hoping that there'd be some frens who could pool their languages together in this thread to help. I myself speak both Germanic and a Latin languages, but no Balto-Slavic ones. Especially Baltic languages seem hold a lot of information, as many of the names of deities are easily traced back to an identifiable root.
What secrets have you unlocked, fren?
R: 18 / I: 4

/ourchristians/ and strategic tolerance of ignorance

I think we are all aware of the problems that come with Christianity such as Zionism, putting jews on a pedastal, universalism, etc.

This is a problem mainly with mainstream conservatives, who attack national socialism from a Christian position.

But non-christian conservatives come to the same conclusions and attack our worldview much in the same way.

The Christians in our broader movement do not like jews and are racially conscious. Some of them believe that white people are the "real jews/israelites", which is false, but it's not a belief that will make them cuck to jews, in fact it's basically the same view jews have of the gojim, but applied to nonwhites instead.

Are those ideas a threat to the movement, or should we let them go unchallenged?

In my opinion, if a Christian puts his race first we should not attack his religion, including pointing out Bible verses that contradict his racial ideas. What does it matter what the Bible says, if he has the right idea? Who's to say he will abandon Christianity, rather than racialism once he sees a contradiction between the two?

Don't get me wrong, I think we should absolutely attack conservatives for being cucks, even if their cucking is Christian in nature and we should not let our racial movement become a Christian one. But we should tell the Christians on tactical grounds never to use their religion as an argument, because it does not work. We can assure them they can try to teach people their religion outside of that, but no one will acknowledge jewish depravity by hearing about how they rejected Jesus (most people don't believe in him and therefore aren't receptive to that argument) or that faggotry is bad because of a bible verse.
R: 61 / I: 30

The thread that will unite ye under one religion

Christianity is cast aside as too jewish by /r/ posters, but it is in fact White culture, and descends from White Egyptian culture. I will prove that ancient Egyptian culture is certainly White, then I will show the connections between the ancient Egyptian Black Art and Christianity, and finally I will reveal the secret kept from even the most prestigious occult graduates, which will unite ye under one religious philosophy like the great king Menes united Upper and Lower Egypt.

Cast all superstitions aside.
R: 33 / I: 20

Can we form our own religion?

I had an interesting idea for a modern more philosophical Christian Mysticism that would preserve the core virtues that made western civilization great, generally keeps all the traditional prayers/rituals the same and leaves room for conspiracy (((speculation))), esoteric philosophy discussions, and freedom of virtue/speech.

The only "dogma" would be that we believe in God and have a rational agnostic approach towards the nature of Christ that is each individual is expected to come to their own conclusions about Christ's history and everyone is allowed to voice their speculations about whether or not its allegory, based on one person, multi-people, or literally New testament verbatim all is true etc.

As for books I would like to see all books of value/use to be included and shared among this congregation i.e the KJV Bible, the Apocrypha, the Gnostic texts, the books in the Ethiopian Bible, useful Masonic/Esoteric works like Secret Teaching of All Ages, Morals and Dogmas, the Kabbalah, the Zohar etc, and if possible English translations of the Talmud (imo it's better to crush Jewish sorcery by being able to point out the roots of their evil instead of just their actions think South Park on Scientology or that cartoon movie on Mormons)

High level organizational structure would be largely decentralized with maybe a council made up of appointed representatives from each church. Local organizational structure would loosely model a fraternal order but limited to 3 degrees (maybe more?): 1st degree probationary period (weed out fedgoys), 2nd degree can attend local meetings and be introduced to anti-Semitic philosophies with the expectation that your not going to Chimp out and will allow you to practice public speaking skills by taking turns talking about something religious or spiritual using the trivium method and the 3rd degree you handle basic responsibilities, public relations, attend council meeting etc.
R: 88 / I: 16

Is it worth it to study the Vedic tradition?

Would the ancient vedic religion be a viable alternative to christianity or neopaganism? Personally I'm skeptical since I dislike anything too feel-good or new age, also there are some things I have trouble getting behind like vegetarianism and nonviolence. On the other hand it is much better documented and more ideologically coherent than most forms of paganism, and lacks most of christianity's most egregious flaws like universalism and race-denialism. And of course, important personalities like Serrano, Evola and Devi borrow heavily from Vedic philosophy in their own teachings.

Why did these traditions never catch on among racially conscious white people in the modern West? Is it just a matter of promoting itself or is there a fault with the religion itself?
R: 38 / I: 3

Was Hitler wrong about jews?

What a provocative title, eh? But I am not talking about his accurate descriptions of the parasitic and subversive nature of the jews, or the horrible acts they engage in. This is /r/, so this is about their religion and the claims Hitler made about it. In Mein Kampf Hitler wrote the following:

>from his own original nature, the Jew cannot possess a religious institution, if only because idealism in any form is lacking in him, and thus belief in an afterlife is completely alien to him.


>this adversary of all humanity, who also then, as always, saw in religion only a means of business existence.


Is it true? Is the jew truly not religious? The rabbis I have watched appear to truly believe in the religious teachings they preach.
R: 1 / I: 0

Chivalry

Consider this in light of the idea of buried/hidden European history as well as hidden truth to religions.

Chivalry The Mystical Origins of Knighthood by Pierre Dujols an Unfinished Manuscript from around 1916 ~

Part One ~
>https://voca.ro/1l2B8dnqphH0

Part Two ~
>https://voca.ro/15JRuVu92eiz
R: 8 / I: 5

Pagan media thread

>Stephen McNallen - God's Folk and Destiny

These recently disappeared from Stephen McNallen's site. Luckily I saved a copy months ago so I was able to throw them on archive. Always save copies of good content you come across as you never know when it will be scrubbed.

https://archive.org/details/gods-folk-and-destiny

Also pagan media threads: audiobooks, pdfs, downloadable videos, and more
R: 38 / I: 15

Abrahamic religion = unaesthetic

A fatal flaw of Abrahamic religion has just entered my mind once again

It's unaesthetic

Many Christian sects intentionally make themselves ugly (Catholic friars that shorn their heads🤮) or extremely plain (Puritans, Amish, Mennonites, honestly pretty much every denomination tbh)

Judaism is of course exactly the same, as any sect or caste of jew clearly finds beauty to be evil

All of Abrahamic religion believes that loving any object other than God, who is separate and distinct from the world, is idolatry and therefore to be avoided. So the women are plain, and the men are plain, and the buildings have no paint or decorations

Islam is obviously the same and perhaps even more extreme than it's older brothers previously mentioned

I believe that in the correct (dharmic) sense that God is perfect, therefore His creation is perfect. God gave us this beautiful world of sensory experiences because He wants us to experience them

We worship God by enjoying beauty for example, and also by revolting ugliness

Divorcing the world from beauty (only God is Good, only God is Beautiful) we objectively create an ugly world, through either negligence or intention
R: 6 / I: 2
I think Islam is stupid because they think that if you hate your parents you're a bad person. But the truth is Muslims only love their parents because they grew up in societies where the state is small. In the West the state is big and with a big state comes alienation. In small state societies there is no welfare, no kindergarten, no public health care, no state pensions etc. So people are very dependent on their family, fathers help their sons start a business, teach them everything they know, support each other in everything, the mom is at home etc. In the West you grow up with a stepdad who doesn't give a fuck about you, your mom is at work all day, you're in indoctrination institution all day, nobody teaches anyone shit, you don't even know your family, elders aren't cared for, children aren't cared for, nobody gives a shit about anyone because the state is there for support, that's why a lot of people in the West hate their parents. Love is nothing but a manifestation of mutual dependence, something which doesn't exist in the West because everyone is only dependent on the state, not on other family members. This is what dumbass Muslims don't understand, they have no insight into this reality because they have no experience of it.
R: 4 / I: 0
I'm an atheist, and generally try to see religion through a clinical lens. Despite this, I love and embrace the traditions, achievements and aesthetics of both white paganism and Christianity, and I think society is ultimately better-off practising some manner of religion. This post is to outline my view on the matter of Christianity’s relationship with the Jews from a historical perspective, and see how it reflects on frens here's opinions.
>Abrahamic Judaism as an organised religion begins in the ancient middle east, Circa the first millennium BC. It is practised by a people both physically and mentally white, but varying genetically and culturally from the more Indo-European influenced continental Europeans. They share these attributes with the other then-occupants of mesopotamia.
>C.33 AD, Jesus is crucified. The divide between Jews and Christians is cemented, and going forward, the Jew would either convert and join with the journey of the other white christians, or proceed with the downward spiral of the Jewish race that would be fulfilled in the succeeding millenia.
>C. 200-400 AD, the talmud is written. This would assert notions of Jewish superiority, and introduce new cultural elements into the Jewish race, that would ingrain themselves into their psyche in a subversive, hateful and barbaric direction.
>C. 350s AD: Christianity would become the majority religion of Europe. From here on, the effect described in the screencap would develop in full force, and continue to do so over the next thousand or more years.
>Sidenote: A principal portion of my argument is based on this screencap, so I strongly urge you to read it. It articulates it in a way that I could not do succinctly here.
In conclusion, I do not believe Christianity to be a religion any more foreign than paganism to Whites. Rather, its founding participants, a white sub-group, have since degraded into the modern Jewish entity we have observed in the past millennia; subversive, hateful and antithetical to all things white and European.
R: 23 / I: 2
Why dont white people hate paul of tarsus? He was the single most successful jew to subvert white civilization. Just like soros or tim wise or john greenblatt, paul was a highly influential person during his time. He travelled around the roman empire convincing everyone to worship the jewish god and texts, telling people to destroy their own gods and that the jewish messiah was for the whole world. Just like the 6 gorillion guilt tripping today, paul said how the jewish messiah died for everyone's sins and if you disagree, you will be tortured forever.

Why is paul considered a good guy?
R: 16 / I: 4

A furore Normannorum libera nos, Domine

On this day, 1230 years ago, 6 gorillion dindus were persecuted by hateful seaborne bigots.
Everyone always talks about what the Vikings did to the Christians, but nobody asks what the Christians did to the Vikings.
The Nordic Resistance Movement explains:
https://www.nordfront.dk/aah-herre-fri-os-fra-nordboernes-vrede/
(no-Dane brainlets can use a translator)
Picrel is Sachsenhain in Verden. The monument, built in 1935, consists of 4.500 stones commemorating the Saxons murdered at Verden.
Happy Lindisfarne-Day to all my Germanic frens. Raise a toast to the martyrs of Verden, Willibrord's bacha-bazi slaves, and every single Germanic resistance fighter of the past millennia.
Kapitulieren? Niemals!
Hail victory.
R: 38 / I: 9

why are so many westerners suddenly embracing pisslam

what is the appeal - jihadis were running over crowds; detonating bombs in concerts; gunning down people on regular basis during the isis years literally every week - have people gotten so sick of degeneracy they grasp for anything with semblance of traditionalism - why are young people shilling for pisslam - its the degenerate religion that promotes pedophilic and slavery of non-muslims - also full of ridiculous myths and muhammad is demon - any white person who embrace pisslam i cannot understand
R: 48 / I: 9

Is Christian NatSoc really the final redpill?

According to what I can often read on this site, "the final redpill" is combining National Socialism with Christianity. This strikes me as odd, since it would imply that so many of the leading NSDAP National Socialists (highlights below), Third Reich era state-sponsored publications (picrel), as well as a large amount of the postwar era writers, thinkers and leaders (Pierce, Riis-Knudsen, Klassen, etc.) would appear to have been wrong about their own movement. Since these arguments keep flaring up and shitting up other threads, let us have the discussion in this thread to spare the others so the jannies don't feel obligated to delete perfectly good threads.
As I see it, the constant attempt by alleged Christians on this site to attach themselves to National Socialism is a sign of insecurity and quite inconsistent. Surely a folkish movement should not have a foreign universalist religion tacked on, any more than it should have its banners made in China.
Frens from fringe Christian sects like Mormons or CI or whatever need not respond - the arguments presented here do not take their positions into account. The anti-NatSoc Christians on here need not respond either.

Martin Bormann: "National Socialist and Christian concepts are incompatible. The Christian churches build upon the ignorance of the men and strive to keep large portions of the people in ignorance because only in this way can the Christian churches maintain their power. On the other hand, National Socialism is based on scientific foundations. Christianity’s immutable principles, which were laid down almost two thousand years ago by Jews, have increasingly stiffened into life-alien dogmas. National Socialism however, if it wants to fulfill its task further, must always guide itself according to the newest data of scientific researchers.”
“When in the future our youth no longer hear anything about this Christianity, whose doctrine is far below our own, Christianity will automatically disappear."

Heinrich Himmler: "We will have to deal with Christianity in a tougher way than hitherto. We must settle accounts with this Christianity, this greatest of plagues that could have happened to us in our history, which has weakened us in every conflict. If our generation does not do it then it would I think drag on for a long time. We must overcome it within ourselves."
"The entire substance of the priesthood and of the whole of Christianity is, I am firmly convinced, an erotic union of men (Männerbund) for the erection and maintenance of this 2,000-year old Bolshevism. I reach that conclusion because I know very well the history of Christianity in Rome. I am of the conviction that the Roman emperors, who eradicated (ausrotteten) the first Christians, did exactly the same thing that we are doing with the communists. These Christians were then the worst yeast which the great city contained, the worst Jewish people, the worst Bolsheviks that there were."

Richard W. Darre: "The conversion of the Germanic peoples to Christianity, i.e. to the doctrine of the Anointed One, deprived the Germanic nobility of its moral foundations.
We cannot imagine the magnitude of upheaval of moral concepts brought about by the German peoples’ conversion to Christianity to sufficiently understand the dissolution with regard to customs and law. In sharp contrast to the idea of the hereditary inequality of human beings, Christianity proclaimed “the accident of birth” and promoted the idea of the equality of all, imparting human traits to the throne of moral concepts. The Germanic nobleman had hitherto regarded himself as a guardian of divine order, placed in this world via the continuing power of procreation and originating from a divine ancestor.
Consequently, he could not receive justification from the “self”; rather, he received it exclusively from what he was worth to the community or nation he led. With his conversion to Christianity, he was completely and thoroughly deprived of the moral ground of his own sense of self as well as his social—and not least his ideological— position in the nation."

Alfred Rosenberg: "The protestant theologians everywhere submit, with universal agreement, to the antifolkish view of the world; the arrogant assertion of the Roman Church that the racial evaluation of Folks signifies un Christian idolatry. These gentlemen overlook, however, that the exceptional position which they attribute to the Jews, represents nothing other than idolatry of the parasitic Judaic manipulators, always hostile to us."
"This young generation nevertheless wishes nothing more than to see the cosmic personality of the founder of Christianity in its actual greatness, without those falsifying additions with which Jewish zealots like Matthew, materialistic rabbis like Paul, African jurists like Tertullianus, or unprincipled crossbreeds like Augustinus, have presented to us as the most frightful spiritual ballast."

Discuss.
R: 5 / I: 2

Egypt Thread

Egypt was based and Nordic. Proof ITT no we wuz niggers allowed.

Although Joe Rogan and other red herring jew henchmen want you to slander your history as mysterious barbarians and tyrants, we know that no civilizations in history have ever been as renowned for their science and engineering as Egypt, Rome, & Germany. Thus no country has ever been more hated by the jews, than Egypt, Rome, & Germany. The Egyptian language, the Latin language, and the German language are all deciphered. Their cultures and real histories are not mysteries. You don't subvert history by erasing it, you just change the perspective. Those great Sun Kings of France? White Supremacist Aristocracy. Those great Founding Fathers of America? White Supremacist Colonizers. Egypt, Rome, and Germany represent the stages of generational jewish propaganda. First you are evil, then you are crazy, and finally, you become such a myth that people question whether you even existed.

Nearly all Egyptian culture associated with the name "Egypt" was developed by White men. Not the modern Egyptian people. Why is it that the Colosseum in Rome is destroyed? Why did the Italians not maintain it, or rebuild it once it had been destroyed? Why is it that the pyramids and statues in Egypt are similarly preserved, but never repaired? It is because these are not the property of modern Egyptians or modern Italians. The Egyptians and Romans who built these structures went extinct, both wiped out by jewish terrorism and White genocide.

The Great Pyramid of Giza for example, was built by Pharaoh Khufu. Khufu reigned during the height of the Egyptian Old Kingdom from 2551-2526 BC. After Khufu during 2520-2493 BC reigned Khafre, whom the Pyramid of Khafre was built for and the Great Sphinx of Giza (either for Khafre or Khufu) which is the Pharaoh with the body of a lion. Picrel is Hetepheres II the blond daughter of Pharaoh Khufu who built the Great Pyramid of Giza. Depicts of the rest of Khufu's lineage also reflect their White racial features. During the height of the Old Kingdom, Egypt was majority White, and only a small minority of Semites were given citizenship.

The Pyramids were also not build with slaves, but conscripted workers. They were built in 27 years and are by no means impossible to construct, yet still impressive. For anyone still skeptical and willfully believing in superstition, the Egyptians were kind enough to write on their pyramids in their language, which is deciphered, how and why the pyramids were constructed. Many know already that they are funeral tombs, the Egyptians believed heavily in the concept of life after death, and this is central to their Egyptian religion/art.

Ramses II, probably the most popular king of Egypt, is testified as the king responsible for the story of the exodus in Judaism. His mummy was famously recovered and found with red hair still intact, a feature exclusive to Whites. He lived during 1303BC-1213BC and represented the height of the Egyptian New Kingdom. Egypt would spend its history being subverted by Semites, and reconquered by Whites, but this would be the last time. This act of removing the Semites from Egypt, and creating Judaism, would lead directly to the Bronze Age Collapse and the fall of Egypt. From there, the White civilizations and tribes in the Middle East would slowly be replaced by Semites until the Middle East today contains only distant genetic relics of White people. The occasional blue eyed baby in a fringe tribe in Iran, or the glaring implications of a slightly lighter skinned brown people representing the upper classes of India over the darker brown skinned lower classes.
R: 5 / I: 1

Has anyone here read this?

I feel like this would be an interesting read for you frens, given that it comes directly from the Third Reich.
R: 10 / I: 4

Complete List of Lost White Cultures and White Genocides

This thread has to be on /r/ because christians are more protected than whites on FRCNSCHAN (Far Right Christian Nationalists -chan) and will be deleted and subverted if it isn't posted here. Also, the words White and Aryan are used interchangeably and mean the same thing ITT. If you need to talk about Aryans as a specific ethnic group you can either say Iranian or Vedic.

Human history is cyclical, dictated by periods categorized by the relationship of White people with their neighbors. A "Dark Age" in White culture always follows a jewish revolution or a White genocide, and always leads to anti-White policies/cultures become normalized. A "Golden Age" always follows a White Renaissance, where pro-White policies are enacted and non-White ethnicities are not treated as a protected class equal to or above Whites.

When Whites came to North America, we replaced the American Indian culture, now that culture is largely lost. But would anyone say that the American Indians were White, because the people who occupy America today are mostly White? Are all Middle Eastern, North African, and Asian societies by default non-White because they aren't located in Europe? Surely not, and there is plenty more evidence of White genocide from outside of Europe, obviously, as there are no more White people there. When Europe suddenly became Christianized, is this evidence of a spiritual enlightenment, if a Dark Age followed? Or is it evidence of a foreign ethnic culture dominating and replacing the previously ethnically White Hellenic culture? Is this why the Swastika and Eagle go missing during that period of history, and why so many ancient Roman statues received the same rhinoplasty treatment as ancient Egyptian statues?

You can determine a culture's race through 4 main methods combined:
>Art: Humans usually depict humans in art as they see them. European art depicts Jesus Christ and Santa Claus as White for example, while Afrocentric Renaissance art depicts Jesus Christ as black. Not because there is significant evidence to prove the race (or existence) of these people, but because that's just the natural color of human skin to the artist. Therefore ancient civilizations depicting themselves with blond hair, blue eyes, and light skin, are not taking artistic liberties, but are likely White.
>Skeletal Remains: Human skeletal remains leave the skull shape and the hair color to be considered. Since usually the nobility can afford to protect their corpses, when much of the nobility of a civilization has blond or red haired corpses, with Nordic skull shapes, that nobility is likely to have been Aryan.
>Language: Parents pass down their language to their kids, just like they pass down their culture and genetics. We can determine that Mexicans are mixed with Whites because they speak Spanish, which is descended from Latin, although Mexicans generally are not racially or culturally associated with Rome at all. Similarly, we can determine that the mixed-race Iranians, who speak Farsi (an Indo-European language) are descended partly from Arabs (Semitic) and partly from Persians (Aryan)
>Common Sense: If a culture has a law prohibiting non-Whites from gaining citizenship, it probably was White.
I will be posting more ITT as much as I can, taking each of these civilizations and giving evidence of their Whiteness, their White genocide/jewish revolution, and the ethnicities that were created as a result of the destruction of these original White cultures. I am also taking recommendations and would like frens to post their own research.
>Egyptians, Sumerians, Vedic Aryans, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Sogdian Aryans, Nepali Aryans, Alans/Slavs, Spain, France, Germany, Britain, America, and so on
White culture is world culture.
R: 6 / I: 3
I thought it was a sun sigil? Is this just a coincidence or do I not know something?
R: 5 / I: 4

Making a fake religion

Have you ever considered the idea of creating a nonsensical religion, which is obviously false to those in the know, but not to its believers?

The idea is that we take a fictional character out of a movie or video game and with the use of AI create a huge mythos around it with worship, an idea of salvation, etc. and then teach this religion to dumb africans who will not have internet access because we stop giving them access to it.

Then we will observe the evolution this religion takes, the conflicts that arise from it, the rituals that form from it, we could even add in ridiculous rituals beforehand.

Basically I am suggesting we do to africans what jews did to us with christianity, but even more ridiculous and not for subversion but for science and for keks.

What do you think? I think it'd be funny.
R: 12 / I: 1

Religious wars

There have been and still are plenty of wars being fought over religion. One or more groups declare their religion to be the correct one, while the enemy is practicing a wrong religion. They declare God™ wants them to convert or destroy the other believers and so they fight a war against them over it.

This goes as far as there being wars fought between different denominations of Christianity or Islam, over who is practicing the same religion correctly. In Christianity, it's Protestants and Catholics and in Islam it's Sunni and Shi'a.

Has there ever been a religious war which did not involve any abrahmic religion on either side of the war, and if yes, how common are these wars? When did the last one happen?
R: 34 / I: 7

spirtual importance of names and name origins

tldr; jews are strict about only using hebrew names, should we be strict in only using European names?

i have been thinking about this for a while. jews near universally name their children hebrew names and go as far as to have restrictions on jews going by names of gentile origin. even entirely secular jews will still use hebrew names. this has had me thinking of any possible spiritual implications of Whites that have names of hebrew origin. there are many Whites that have names of hebrew origin (including myself). for example david, john, joshua, daniel, michael, james, joseph, and noah are all extremely common names for Whites. given that jews have such a strong aversion to non jewish names would it be appropriate to assume that there are any legitimate spiritual reasons to avoid hebrew names? if so is it a big enough issue to consider changing my name? if i were to change it i would most likely use my middle name which was my grandfathers name and of entirely European origin

my last name also means has the meaning of priest (something like one of these: Deacon, Abbot, Parsons, Bishop, Prior, Taggart,
Pope). There is some concern i have in both my first name being of hebrew origin and my last name meaning priest of a religion of hebrew origins. this may sound ridiculous and to be honest id never really thought about it until finding out about just how strictly jews adhere to their hebrew names.

if anyone has any thoughts on this or knows of any sources that discuss this more in depth i would greatly appreciate it.
pic unrelated
R: 127 / I: 32

ISLAM FOR WHITES

There seems to be a common sentiment on the right that Islam is incompatible with whiteness. Islam is in fact incompatible with "western thought" (liberalism/libertarianism) but that is what has put is in the situation we are in now.

What is Islam really? It is nothing more than strict monotheism. The term "Abrahamic" denotes nothing but this. Abraham lived in a polytheistic pagan society, he rejected it and sought to establish a monotheistic tradition, and for this was blessed by God. He wasn't even the first monotheist either. Islam poses the idea that Monotheism is inherently natural to us since the oneness of God has always been self-evident.

>but muh young brides of the prophet

Who cares. Marrying off your daughters at a young age was the norm for all of history including for most every character of the bible. Besides Muslims don't worship the prophet, they only worship God. He is revered for being chosen by God to reveal the final testament.
>but muh Christian values™
What have they yielded? Christianity condemns judgement of others while also posing the idea that God accepts everyone. In contrast to Islam, which says that nobody can possibly know for sure who God accepts, and doesn't shame you for having disgust towards faggots or whoever. Christian values perpetuate a victim mentality just like judaism that stays with people even after leaving the church. The so-called "sexism" and "homophobia" that exists in christianity is so weak and ineffective that it in fact creates more feminism and gay shit. If you are a child being brainwashed into thinking you are a faggot while also being exposed to the idea that God will accept you no matter what, why would you care about your dad telling you it's bad. In Islam you are constantly encouraged to self-improvement since you aren't just promised paradise for nothing. All of the LGBT positivity in Islam is completely astroturfed by kikes. Whereas it is even more present in Christianity than the average follower of Christ would even care to acknowledge.
>but muh Jesus
Christ is held in higher regard in Islam than the prophet. In Islamic end-time prophecy, Jesus returns to the earth to fight alongside the Muslims, the prophet does not. It makes no sense to worship him just like it would make no sense to worship Abraham or the prophet. A Muslim would in fact consider Jesus to be a Muslim. The word "Christian" literally means to be like Christ-like, which should mean to worship the One God as he did.
>but muh shitskins
In the Quran it says that God and His Angels revealed the Quran in "a clear Arabic tongue" so that there would be no doubt as to the message. Indeed Arabic is an incredibly complex and developed language in comparison to English. You could destroy every single copy of the Quran in existence and the Muslims would have it re-printed in a matter of hours. In Islam a convert is considered more blessed than one who is born into an Islamic culture. Because simply adopting a religion out of family is not the same as seeking it and finding it. Nothing at all in Islam has anything to do with race. It has only to do with God.

It is worth noting that even though the National Socialist party was comprised of many Christians, since Christianity was basically the default religion for European whites, they had a particular respect for Islam, calling it not only "compatible with our ideas" but a "practical and strong religion" "suitable for soldiers" while Christianity is "an effeminate religion of suffering".

The people who can understand Islam the best are Christians. It is basically the same thing, you just worship God and not Jesus. It has the same lineage of prophets, but the Quran as the Final testament of the Bible and Muhammad as the Final prophet.
The people who will reject it the most are people who idealize paganism. There is a very good reason paganism is no longer established in white culture except among (mostly female) new agers and wigger edgelords. These are typically not very happy or well-balanced people to begin with.

A White Muslim
•shouldn't be expected to memorize quranic arabic
•shouldn't be expected to pray 5 times a day
•has no reason to support immigration regardless of if the migrants are of the same religion
•shouldn't be expected to refer to God as Allah except in prayer (it is indeed a powerful name)
•shouldn't be expected to throw on copious honorifics when speaking of the prophets or of God.

I am a White Muslim. You would probably not know by looking at me except on certain days when I like to wear a kufi. My wife doesn't cover her hair. I was raised in several flavors of Christianity and found I hate faggots, kikes, trannies and niggers. There is a targeted effort to demonize Islam among whites (the war on terror™ etc.). In fact the Jew CLEARLY fears the Muslim, even if he loves sending hordes of them across your borders after completely destroying the infrastructure in their country for monetary gain.

Islam is NOT a religion of peace. It is a religion of internal peace, but it is in fact a religion of REVOLT AGAINST THE MODERN WORLD

THE BULLY JIHAD IS NOW
R: 2 / I: 0

Question about the Orthodox

How based are the average Orthodox Churchgoers? Do they know about the jews, or do they blame the death of Jesus on the Romans?
R: 11 / I: 1

Pagan Holidays

Do you celebrate any pagan holidays aside from the normie ones like Christmas and Easter and how do you celebrate them? Do you celebrate the normie ones like Easter and Christmas differently from normies?
R: 46 / I: 13

Talmudic Study Thread

This thread is for the study, referencing and collection of notable tracts from the Talmud, Zohar and other notable Jewish books.

>What is the Talmud?

The Talmud is a huge collection of doctrines and laws compiled and written before the 8th Century, A.D., by ancient Jewish teachers. The Talmud, which often cites the Old Testament, is the basic book of Jewish law.
"If the Bible is the cornerstone of Judaism, then the Talmud is the central pillar, soaring up from the foundations and supporting the entire spiritual and intellectual edifice. In many ways the Talmud is the most important book in Jewish culture, the backbone of creativity and of national life." -Rabbi Adin Even Israel Steinsaltz
>What is the Zohar?
The Zohar is the central work of the Jewish mystical tradition of kabbalah. Traditionally attributed to the second-century sage Rabbi Shimon bar Yochai, the Zohar’s authorship has been subject to debate from the time it first appeared in 13th-century Spain. The work centers around Rabbi Shimon and his students as they travel the land of Israel and interpret the Torah esoterically.
>Where can I read it?
https://www.sefaria.org/texts/Talmud
https://www.sefaria.org/Zohar
http://www.come-and-hear.com/talmud/index.html
R: 29 / I: 2
Hello, frens. I thought we should have a proper Hitlerist thread. Here are some suggested Hitlerian holidays. Discuss Hitlerism ITT.
R: 4 / I: 2
People of Nordic Germanic faith, behold, I have found an esoteric/occultist "paganizer" or "nordinizer" or "germaninizer" (fuck I dont know how to call this), its basically a subliminal from a well known channel that is in the theme of a "berzerker". I use it before entering gym but I found out that it also increases your total paganizing. Its from "Binaural Nutrition". I will post the link in the next post:

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsTalLUgL_lAhlKfBjfMP6w


- PRE-RELEASE - (14.07.2022)

Berserkers - the legendary Viking warriors renowned for their ferocity in battle, known to fight in a trancelike state of blind rage (berserkergang) and total fear inhibition. According to Old Norse sagas, berserkers were mostly unarmoured, thus being very agile and physically endurant, capable of killing opponents "with a single blow" of their two or one-handed axes.

Inspired by the legends, I developed the comprehensive product - BERSERK - a highly stimulating composition of subliminal & supraliminal messages, modified white noise, and binaural beats completed by an auditory stimulation effect, made to impact the body and mind in both short and long-term, and induce a berserk-like state.
The audio frequencies will directly impact the listener's response of the brain -> nervous system -> body pathway, enhancing dopamine and noradrenaline release while inhibiting fear by temporarily ceasing the functioning of the amygdala - the brain part responsible for fear processing. In the process, improving physical performance (strength, agility, endurance) and uplifting mood. Moreover, affirmations and afformations will program the conscious and subconscious mind to suppress anxiety and fear and establish a warrior mindset - self-confident, determined, competitive, disciplined, and fully focused on reaching goals.


For best results, listen to 2-3x daily.

To reach short-term effects, you can listen to it occasionally, once or twice as a pre-workout, or before completing a task that requires a fearless and highly focused mindset.


Due to its stimulating properties, listening before sleep is inadvisable. Carefully observe how your mind and body respond to this product. If any disturbing adverse effects occur, discontinue use, and report them. During the pre-testing phase, cold sweats and moderate restlessness were reported.
R: 14 / I: 4

gpt4 on religion

So far this seems to be the general layout of entries, though sometimes the results seem to be inverted. Might be some weird algorithm I can't recognize

Here's the HATED list first. I requested this first because it regularly broke down and refused to elaborate further once it got to the disliked section
R: 67 / I: 13

White man and Buddhism

What's your thoughts on Buddhism. I have recently converted. I am a white man. It has saved me from a life of degeneracy and depression. I was Mormon before. Now I mediate daily. It have a much better control over my mind and thoughts. I no longer wallow in resentment and pity. These are things to be avoided. I still suffer because life is suffering. I would like to know you frens though on using Buddhism to reawaken the white man and bring to fruition an existence for our people and a future for white children.
R: 20 / I: 3

What is this faggot signalling?

Say you are a man that has made it his daily bread to learn and teach about symbols and symbology, would you present yourself to the viewer like this, and why? Is there any "pagan" meaning behind the masonic chessboard and the horns?
R: 22 / I: 5

How come all you Christophobes never cry about this?

All you Christophobes are Jew or Muslim shills.

Islam wrecked the native and ancient Persian religion of Zoroastrianism–by the sword. But you don't cry about that.

They are some debates about when Zoroastrianism started, but most of the documents state that it originated around 4000 years ago in Iran and India by a prophet named Zoroaster.

Until Islam invaded.

https://blog.termehtravel.com/zoroastrianism-ancient-persian-religion/
R: 195 / I: 43
Jews curse Christians and white countries in all their worship services, including their daily prayers. It's called the Birkat haMinim.
R: 2 / I: 0

Determinism in the Bible

Romans 8:29
29 For those whom he foreknew he also predestined to be conformed to the image of his Son, in order that he might be the firstborn among many brothers

Ephesians 1:4-5
4 even as he chose us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and blameless before him. In love 5 he predestined us for adoption to himself as sons through Jesus Christ, according to the purpose of his will,

Revelation 13:8 and all who dwell on earth will worship it, everyone whose name has not been written before the foundation of the world in the book of life of the Lamb who was slain.

Revelation 17:8
The beast that you saw was, and is not, and is about to rise from the bottomless pit and go to destruction. And the dwellers on earth whose names have not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world will marvel to see the beast, because it was and is not and is to come.

Matthew 25:34
Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world.

John 15:16
16 You did not choose me, but I chose you and appointed you that you should go and bear fruit and that your fruit should abide, so that whatever you ask the Father in my name, he may give it to you

John 6:44
44 No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draws him. And I will raise him up on the last day
R: 24 / I: 1

On "paganism"

This is a honest question to Christians on this board, concerning "paganism", "occultism" and "satanism". How do you reconcile the fact that these groups are all responsible for the decline of the West, when all these denominations are highly splintered, fringe and minority movements without any direct political power? You could perhaps point out Freemasonry (if freemasonry is even occult), but that would leave out thousands of other groups that are so small, you are unlikely to ever meet a member of any of these groups.

I mean, how often do you even see these people in your day to day lives? The only time I ever saw people wearing satanic imagery was when some metal-group was in town, never met a Wiccan personally, cant point out that many people who are even vaguely new-age, know some asatru-types because I am active in nationalist circles, know two people with an interest in esoteric lit, also from being in nationalist circles. But, most of the time these people don't really exist.

So, I am really wondering what universe you inhabit to think these fringe movements are a threat and not, oh…. the far left with it's power over politics, the universities and companies.
R: 31 / I: 8

Muslim christian frens

Hello guys
I don't know if I'm the first Jordanian fren on this website
But I just want to tell you
You Christians are our frens, Jesus will return and it'll be great

Keep mirin frens brothers or sikkunts keep a good mindset even if you're in a bad situation make yourself believe you're the best
We're all gonna make it frens that's what the revolution is that's what it's all about.
R: 9 / I: 2
The values of the Creator, as revealed in Natural Order, consist of Blood and Soil, Eternal War, Hierarchical Supremacy, and Manifest Destiny. It is through the embodiment of these values that we experience a relationship with the Creator, and through the creation of a new people that the Aryan race is reborn.

TG @hyperboreanism
R: 7 / I: 1

Jews Created Jesus To Subvert Rome

Ancient Rome banned the worship of many pagan religions. Coincidentally an offshoot of Judaism with many pagan similarity was formed. Not long after a great fire crippled the Roman Empire. One which originated from the merchant district and was spread by arsonists. Emperor Nero suspected Christian involvement. Is it possible the Jews started the fire and used Christianity as a scapegoat? While inciting animosity between Rome and Christianity. Using the new found religion as a proxy to destabilize Rome.
R: 1 / I: 1
Is guilt a sign of demonic possession? Just wondering, going over my life, whenever I try to do what is good, guilt has always persuaded me against it. Guilt is the main tool they use to control us. Endless amounts of guilt. You are guilty for racism, for colonialism, for being a man, you are guilty when you fight back or when you try to do what is right. It seems more and more clear to me that those who feel guild are under control of something.
R: 49 / I: 20
Occultist here, I have a small new theory as to how some religions operate, at least on one level. As you may know, there is this dude called jung, who described archetypes in detail. Well then things like the briggs myers are just watered down modern tard things, less useful, but still derived from jung.

So one lil ol day I asked the gpt4 to do a silly thing like to assign archetypes to each religion. And pic related is what you get. The stories of each religion usually have a few main archetypes to it. And those archetypes are present in society in certain percentages. Each religion has different origin stories and mentions different types. And usually it is tied in to other minor archetypes. Like jesus the healer archetype having adventures with other archetypes. And once he meets the other archetypes, the person on society, if he sees that story, feels closeness to it, and its probably a big factor why people choose a certain religion.

The healer of christianity, the warrior (duty dude) of islam. Perhaps the pagan gods were also more war like. But since in each society there are a lot of weak people, when a religion like the "weak people boss" that is jesus came, he basically gave a voice to all of these people who were without one, and who were in service of the warriors.

Is this how Christianity conquered paganism? Because the housewives, the losers, the poor, who were uncles, family, fellow citizens, eventually just decided not to help the warrior types? As a national socialist I am intrigued on this prospect and maybe want to see theoretical solutions that can reverse this trend, to silence the weak and the rabble again.
R: 15 / I: 0

Roman's invented Jesus to defect Jewish rebellions?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jYxPlK0GdilW/

Interesting theory. Says ongoing Jewish rebellions were a major threat to Roman Empire because it might give others same idea, so they invented a pacifist "other" cult where you could be outside Roman Govt rule but not really do anything and certainly not form secret militia or ethnic rebellion groups.

One of the better theories I've heard and makes lots of sense, but I'm that guy who says no evidence anything Christian (or Muslim) even existed prior to 1000AD.

And I'd say that if The Church was created prior it was a Jewish invented psyh-op and "Christianity is the shrill demand by the Jews that all other Nations commit suicide", and by "shrill" he means emphatic but without any facts or logic.
R: 1 / I: 0

Occult History of the Reich

https://archive.org/details/hitlerandtheoccultnazism_20200405
I've heard people claim this stuff is bullshit, but regardless, I found this neat little documentary very compelling. It covers the occult stuff (Thule Society, etc.).
R: 127 / I: 9

Suffering cannot coexist with an omnipotent omnibenevolent God

If God is omnipotent, he is able to end suffering. If God is omnibenevolent, he is willing to end suffering. Because suffering exists, however, there is not an omnipotent omnibenevolent God. I don't know how I expect you guys to refute this – it's completely airtight… But discuss anyway
R: 10 / I: 2
>Be me
>It's Easter
>Relatives convince me to go to church
>Arrive at the local church of my cousins
>It's reformed, though not that strict
>I immediately get greeted by a Somali
>I am so happy for having found our lord and saviour
>yada yada
>Enter, it's completely white, except one guy with an Indonesian wife.
>The audience is old, but there are plenty of young people.
>Long Easter service that was genuinely good.
>Al right this wasn't so bad.
>Get approached after the service by an older woman and her young daughter.
>A kind of uncomfortable talk takes place, basically the woman want's to know how I can hate people for the color of their skin.
>Flat out state, that there is no such thing as "hate" or "racism".
>The woman is confused for a while.
>Calls back with, yes, but God loves all people equally.
>Flat out state, that there is no such thing as "love" or "equality"
>Get insane bug-eyed look from both ladies.
>The pastor was standing behind me.
>Start's talking: You know Fren, now a days nihilism and hedonism are very popular statements amongst many of your generation.
>Go extra mile on the autism meter. Explain how nihilism can be overcome by grounding morality in both natural law and social contract theory. Next describe how Hedonism is mostly about cutting out extremes from your life, as that is what the ancient Greeks did.
>See him thinking for a while, but Fren do you belief in God?
>Yes, naturally, the unfolding of evolution, both cosmic, biologically and intellectually, suggest a metaphysical source behind this world.
>See him thinking some more. Then he flat-out states: Christianity is about belief and no intellectual debate could convince me, but only the Holy Ghost.
>Agree with him.
>He looks confused again.
>Realize I have now entered the rabbit hole where nothing I think makes a lot of sense to people anymore.
>Family didn't make much of an issue about it.
R: 6 / I: 2
is robert spencer a good source for the academic study of islam? Or is he a christian shill that has biases which cloud scientific thinking?
R: 122 / I: 23

Omniscience necessitates determinism

Omniscience necessitates determinism

God knew that you would sit down on your computer and make a post on frenschan on April 2nd at 12:47 PM. He knew every letter, every pause, every breath, the spin of every atom, and he knew it 100 trillion years ago. He knew it an infinity before that as well

God knew that you would perform this action an infinity ago. At no point could your action ever be different from the action that God foreknew (or he would be mistaken and not omniscient)

Therefore God, the creator of all things, predetermined your entire life an infinity ago
R: 40 / I: 7
The oldest known reference to the Norse God Odin is accompanied by a Swastika.

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2023/mar/08/oldest-known-reference-to-norse-god-odin-found-in-danish-treasure-trove
R: 51 / I: 1

Why are so many pagans shitlibs?

Was looking for local pagan meetups and only found one, at a store. Upon further inspection the owner seems to be an actively anti-white covid retard. Why is this sort of thing so common? You would think that once you swallowed the redpill of worshipping the old gods you would inevitably start to resent the jews for genociding our ancestors with christianity. Or is paganism for most people merely a consumer identity based on crystals, le epic marvel movies, and hating muh sky daddy?

I'm a pagan obviously so I'm not trying to talk shit about my bros here. But it's pretty fucked when I would rather go to a church that literally worships jews rather than try to hang out with these fools.
R: 4 / I: 0
The 10 Commandments of the German Folk

You might find these interesting and apply them to your own folk.

1. You shall fear God alone, but nothing of this world

2. You shall not use your word lightly, your word is your bond

3. You shall celebrate holidays of Germanic achievements and thank their creators

4. You shall honor and love your ancestors and uphold their achievements and virtues

5. You shall keep your chin high and not allow your people's rights to be violated

6. You shall keep your house and land free from outsiders and not engage in comradeship with them

7. You shall not imitate foreign traditions and culture

8. You shall be proud of your German ancestry and defend its honor

9. You shall not let greed and materialism take priority over your duty to your people

10. You shall be hard working and willing to make sacrifices for the benefit of your people
R: 22 / I: 8

Zoroastrianism

Zoroastrianism is one of the oldest organized religions still practiced today. Zoroastrianism includes themes dualism (good vs evil; creation vs nothingness) and free will. The religion may very well have been the religion of our early Aryan ancestors. So is Zoroastrianism based? What are some good resources to learn more about it?
R: 13 / I: 4

Know Thy Enemy of Islam


"If you know the enemy and know yourself, you need not fear the result of a hundred battles. If you know yourself but not the enemy, for every victory gained you will also suffer a defeat. If you know neither the enemy nor yourself, you will succumb in every battle."
R: 2 / I: 0

Sunday sermons on TikTok?

How would you all feel about taking random passages from The Bible to meditate on on Sundays for the art of setting an intention? Manifesting?

Neville Goddard was the true Jesus Christ. Both in the sense of he says we all are, but also he personally taught me that The Bible is not some record of an angry Jew god out to get me or tell me how to live, rather an explanation to my own internal struggles towards godhood.
R: 34 / I: 4

should we just move beyond religion

After seeing all the religious shilling the last month or so, I am starting to wonder if religion (not God, an afterlife or rituals) are the problem. Think about it, how many religions do you know that are actually ethnic? and if they are, you can't really join them for that very reason.

Anyone can become a Christian, Muslim, Buddhist, Occultist, you name it. But not everyone can become a Jew, or Hindu or a White Nationalist. Because those are ethnic dispositions. In that sense, why even bother with religion? Why? All you need is your own identity and then you just make a metaphysical leap to accept God. That's it.

What we need is a quiet merger of our political worldview, with metaphysical assumptions, which are completely common sense. You don't need revelation to accept there is a God and we are already completely grounded when we accept our Race as a basis. So why bother with religion?
R: 38 / I: 8

Christians have always loved Jews

"When I made the village of Speyer a city, I thought I would increase the prestige of this place of ours a thousandfold by attracting Jews there as well. I settled the newcomers outside the dwellings of the other citizens, and so that they would not be so easily disturbed by the insolence of the inferior people (goyim), I surrounded them with a wall."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/R%C3%BCdiger_Huzmann test1
R: 9 / I: 0
>Go to church with le'gf
>See pastor fumbling around concepts like God's love and sin
>He cannot begin to imagine God is internal. There is outer God. We in this mortal coil are the living Christ in which God acts through.
>The self dies for our sins in failure. We fail again and again on this plane and we can ascend. That's it. That's all the Bible actually says. The whole buttsex thing and blasphemy is a meme.

I used to avoid Christians, now I just feel bad for them. It's like watching someone try to crawl up some stairs when their legs are broken.
R: 1 / I: 0
is the book of acts of apostles historically reliable? Or is it pro-paul revisionism?
R: 8 / I: 3

Weird Things About Local Baptist Pastor

Hello fellows, this is OP from >>3479
Like I mentioned in my previous post, my gf is a very committed Christian. Sometimes I go to church with her, which is a very basic small baptist church. To preface this, I have a really strong ability to read people and at many times in my past I have had an odd and specific feeling about someone very early on and it turn out to be exactly the case later on. I have learned to trust this feeling quite a lot after years of seeing my feelings about people I pick up on come to fruition.
This pastor is a guy in his 30s. From his demeanor, the way he stands, gestures, his facial expressions and intonation while speaking, I get the very strong sense that he doesn't genuinely believe the things he says and that he knows that Christianity has a true nature that most people don't explicitly think about or come to realize the implications of.
His preaching style is very basic, baptists aren't known for being expressive or anything in church for the most part. However, he preaches from the Old Testament a ton. Most of the time. And he, unlike most pastors and preachers I've heard, refers to the people of the OT as 'The Jews' instead of 'The Israelites'. He talks a lot about the name of God, Yahweh, and uses the name Yahweh very often when speaking of God, quite candidly and naturally, which is something that very few except the Christian zionists do. Of course there are many who use the name of Jehovah, which is the most widely used English name for YHWH in the western world when a name is used, whereas 'Yahweh' has very heavy Jewish connotation. Essentially, he knows and consciously embraces quite a bit more about the actual nature of the Torah and Christianity's explicitly Jewish nature.
His facial expressions, intonation, and body language are the things which give me the most uneasy feeling. I could be mistaken, but to me it feels that deep down he has disconnected himself from the contradictory/incomprehensible Jewishness but carries it forward deliberately as a footsoldier, as if he were a sort of Christian Zionist. Simply put, I don't know that he really believes and agrees with the things he reads, but reads it anyway because it is the position he has arrived at in life and intends to remain there. Some of the aforementioned is suspicion based off of this feeling, but this feeling itself is extremely strong, I don't think he, as a typical pastor of a small church who just believes it all as everyone else there does with no effort to signal that to others, is 'unconsciously' committing the ministering in a natural manner. He seems to consciously try to signal that he really does totally believe in it.
I know that many, many in the top levels of churches know the true nature of Christianity but play their role in it anyway, such as the Pope, Orthodox Patriarch, protestant megachurch preachers, Anglican archbishop, etc. I make this post because it seems odd that I see all of the manufactured piety of those figures in this small-town Baptist pastor.
R: 13 / I: 3

Riddle me this...

The death of Jesus is a Jewish lie
Jesus lived in Europe
He was not the Son of God
He was with us 1000 years ago
The Jews attempted his murder and failed
The Jews are not the Children of Israel
The Children of Israel were white Europeans
The Bible is a Lie
The Apocryphal books are Lies
The Vatican is the antichrist
The Vatican created the notion of antichrist
They created the modern Jew
They created the modern Christian
They created the modern Muslim
They created the modern Satanist
They created the modern history
The new world order is not something coming
We live in it right now

Only one book supports every one of these statements. Can you guess what it is?
R: 9 / I: 2

Book of Mormon general

Read the first page…
Thoughts? Is it heresy?
R: 1 / I: 0

Redpill me about Saturn

in general, but in judaism especially
R: 0 / I: 0

The Swastica is Gods own Symbol

What are the political implications of the swastica being gods own symbol.

Odins Ahnenerbe
https://frenschan.org/r/res/630.html

Highest Good: Aryan Blood!

The Ahnenerbe (German: ancestral heritage) operated in National Socialist Germany between 1935 and 1945. Heinrich Himmler, the Reichsführer-SS, established it as an SS appendage devoted to the task of promoting the idea that the modern Germans (and the white people in general) descended from an ancient Aryan race. The group comprised scholars and scientists from a broad range of academic disciplines.

Highest Good. Aryan Blood. We must secure the existance of our people and a future for white children. Wotans conscious lives in our indogermanic blood and connects us all with each other. Do not let GOD die (God is derived from Godan which is the gothic word for Wodan/Odin).

Tyr (Teiwaz, Tiwaz, Ziu, Tuisto, Zio) is a god in the Germanic writings of the Edda, where he is named as the god of battle and victory on the one hand, but also appears as the preserver of law and order on the other. The Old Norse form of the name is the most commonly known and used. Other singular language forms are in Old English Tiw, Tig, Old Dutch dīs and Old High German Ziu, Tiu, Tiuz.

The root of his name suggests that Tyr was originally a father or sky god.

"As progenitors and founders of their nationhood, they [the Teutons] glorify Tuisto, a god sprung from the earth, and his son Mannus in ancient songs-the only kind of historical tradition that exists among them."
- Tacitus: Germania 2,2

The manuscripts to the Germania offer a great variety of spellings of the name; Tuistonem and Tuisconem can be discerned as the main variants. A decision between the two forms of the name is neither possible from the tradition nor from the etymology. Both can be traced back to an element of Germanic *twis- "two-".

German (Deutsch) comes from Teutsch. Teutsch from Teutz. Teutz from Tuisto/Ziu/Tiwisko.
This is the root like Deus/Dyaeus/Zeus.

Odin = Wodan = Godan (Gothic name) = God.
Odin however is the first.
In the Indo-European Russian language ODIN is called ONE until today.
ODIN (=Godan = God) has breathed his breath (Odem = Odin) according to the Edda into an ash tree trunk (=life tree = DNA).
Ziu = Zwo = Two (Two). (Example Twilight) = Deus = Zeus

So the Germans are (according to legend, which always contains a grain of truth) descendants of God.
Therefore, whoever touches the Germans and white people in general, touches God.

In you lives the heritage of millions of ancestors, the blood of your whole people.
Behind your 2 parents there are 4 grandparents, 8 great-grandparents and so on. With each previous ancestor sequence the number of your ancestors doubles. In the 25.
Generation it is already more than 33 million. 25 generations, that is about
600 years. From each of these 16 million men and 16 million women you are
you are a part, a breath, a feeling, a thought. All of them still live in
your form and your being immortally until today. 16 million men
and 16 million women have woven on you, have bequeathed, strengthened or
erased. All the people of that time are your ancestors, as they are the ancestors of all of us.
So also the history of your people is your own history.
Our common blood and our common history make us
brothers. In this great community, your blood, your soul also lives on.
It lives in your deeds and works, your thinking and dreams . and will
one day be in your children and grandchildren.

You too, fight for the future of this blood! In the blood
of your people you are immortal.

Discuss
R: 6 / I: 1
can anyone in-the-know give me the quick pitch for Platonism? I see a lot of White nationalist ecelebs promoting it the last year and want to know why. I find it difficult to latch onto Christianity or paganism because I didn't grow up to be religious, but I have a lot of religious and non-nihilistic intuitions if that makes sense, so my guess is Platonism is being shilled because it fills this void without having to larp as a Christian?
R: 3 / I: 0
Tell me everything you know about the nag hammadi library. and why the jews dont want us reading it
R: 51 / I: 6

What are your thoughts on Muslim Caucasians

Not the best place to ask since Im sure everybody here hates muslims,but what are your thoughts on the caucasian ones (Ingush,Kumyk,Karachay-Balkars,Chechens,Circassians)
R: 7 / I: 0

Why don’t you believe in Christ?

Preface: I’m not a Christian. I grew up in the church, but I never really believed it. I just faked it so as to not get criticized for not being a Christ follower. I’m currently investigating different religions and philosophies and am open to discussing anything.
That being said, over the course of my time on /pol/, I’ve seen a lot of d&c religion threads, and I’ve come to realize two main themes. When defending their religion, Christians will most often point to the achievements we made during the period in which Europe was mostly Christian. Pagans, or agnostics, or whatever you personally are, generally choose to attack the nature of Christianity, labeling it as semetic and anti-white because of its inclusivity. However, just because something is anti-white, it doesn’t mean it isn’t true. I have yet to see any pagan attempt to attack Christianity purely on the basis of its authenticity. So this brings me here. Without discussing the nature of Christianity, and primarily focusing on the historical authenticity of it, why do you not believe in Christ?
R: 2 / I: 0

Sharing in fellowship.

I'm going to consider you a brother in Christ and share a question God graced me with today. Which went off in a completely unexpected direction
>What is the Book of Life?
Turns out, 2nd only to Christ himself when it comes to importance to humanity.
>Holy fucking shit! If that's true I'll suck your wiener! What is it!
It's the Book with EVERY HUMAN that has ever, or will ever be born in it. It's basically the first sorting process. When you stand before God in judgement they check your name. If you're not in the book, your soul gets thrown out.
Revelation 20:15
>Uhhh,,,,,ok I mean, makes sense. Don't want any….????clones??? Getting in?"
No, not clones. Just the people who got kicked off of the list.
>WAIT?! WHAT!!!!. You didn't say anything about getting kicked off. Has it ever happened before?
Yeah, actually. Couple of times. There was this group of jews Moses was leading around. Not EVERY jew mind you. But a whole tribe of them had to go.
Exodus 32:30-35
>No fucking way? A WHOLE TRIBE of Jews just *pfft* out of the book huh?
Yeah, David actually brings it up again
Revelation 20:11-15
>Well fuck, ok. This is serious. So goal one is obviously getting in the book. Soooo assuming you have a soul you're in there right?
Yep, if you are people you are g2g.
>And since you can get kicked off the list goal two is staying on the list. Well, fuck, ok…. we know God takes the whole idolatry thing seriously. Is there any thing else? Did he leave us any clues?
Yeah, there is a whole list of ways to get written off the list. 8 as a matter of fact.
Rev 21:8
>Ah yes, the Ten com….wait? You said 8?
Yep. "Cowards, the unbelieving, the vile (which means those who's tolerate the following), and murderers, the sexually immoral, any who practice magics, idolaters clearly, and all liars.
>So the big 10 C don't mean anything?
No, those decide your lot in life in when you reincarnate.
>Wtf?
Yeah, you live in a "city" that's 1400 miles square with it's tallest spire also being 1400miles/2200km tall. How well you kept the commandments basically decides you're status in the city. Rev 20:11 and
Rev 21:16
>Oh! That's BULLSHIT! I don't want to be in "heaven" if I'm still some wage monkey!
Ok, first off, it's Heaven. Just picture the most content life you can imagine. Yeah, you're not even close. But hey, if you want you can always leave and live with the sinners outside the walls.
Rev 22:14
>WTF! WHY DOES THE CHURCH NEVER TALK ABOUT THIS?!
They are too busy getting you to celebrate your Savior being crucified. Which is weird since that was just prophecy fulfillment. You SHOULD be celebrating his resurrection.
>Screw you, I don't celebrate Christ's death.
Yeah sure. Now get down on your knees and thank him for dying in front of an effigy of the worst day in anyone's life.
>Ssssooooo aaa sin! SIN still existS?
Well, yeah. It's hard wired in with free choice. If you can choose, you can always choose sin. Some people will, even when all biological imperative to sin is gone.
>So these people live in sin outside the walls of the city/country. And every other country sends the c/c money, rewards, etc. Sounds alot like what Israel is doing, but on orders of magnitude larger.
Well, Satan does like to try and imitate God. Kind of his thing.
>Jawdrop.gif
That's what I said.
R: 11 / I: 2

Islamo-christianity / koranism IS the traditional religion of European Whites

I get shit on everytime i make a thread on this topic but here i go again for those with reason. let me make something perfectly clear to you guys, EVERYTHING we supposedly know about this character called "the prophet muhammad" comes from the hadiths, NOT the koran. there is virtually no mention of a guy named muhammad in the actual koran. however you will notice that the koran speaks about a guy named Isa (Jesus) a LOT, and right from the very beginning too. but it says something VERY important about him, first, he WAS the messiah, but NOT literally the son of God, furthermore it says VERY clearly that he was NOT crucified. you see, Jesus is a part of European collective memory, so much that we still portray him as white (he was) despite all the so-called evidence that he wasnt. ok what else does the koran say? it says that Musa (moses) was the uncle of Jesus, and that they were even alive at the same time! what? that doesnt fit with our history based on the biblical narrative! exactly. there is a massive difference in reconciling the quranic timeline into the bible and vice versa. I see threads here all the time saying Jesus wasnt real because there is no mention of him before 1000 bc. correct, because that's how long ago he actually lived. oh this schizo islam shit again??? yes. now these books called hadiths (stories about the prophet) they come from jesuit and freemason universities, they arent considered reliable even by lots of modern muslims, but over the last hundred or so years that they have been around they have become part of the culture of islam especially in more modernized countries. ok so what else does the koran tell us? it tells us that during it's time the people it calls the Jews worship osiris. what? what kind of jews are they talking about? guess what, the jews we have now, they were invented by the vatican during the renaissance era. the bible was created to back up this history they created, along with all of the "found" documents they published at the same time. actually modern judaism didnt even catch on until anout 150 years ago. every time i mention david ewing jr i just get a bunch of retarded shit like "he's short" "he looks funny" "is he a pakistani or some shit?" watch his interviews. all he is doing is compiling data and telling you about shit he has seen personally from travelling the world way more than the average person. but more important than him, read the koran. what kind of pussy wouldnt even look at it. what, are you scared? worried you'll start praising god or something? worried you might find out that the history of paganism in europe is bold faced fucking lie? maybe you like that history, maybe your content with thinking it's just the (new) jews. maybe you like hating people, maybe you think you can succed without god on your side. maybe you are christian and it doesnt bother you how fucking gay it has become. maybe your a pagan and you like doing acid and drinking or whatever the fuck. maybe your're a satanist who actually likes doing gay shit, maybe you're an israeli and don't want to be told that the real jerusalem is in europe and that you're basically fighting for an old mining outpost. or for that matter maybe you're a proper modern muslim who believes the official history that was given to you by people who want you dead. the koran is european history, everything else is a lie. yes the holocaust was also a lie, but is that all it takes to satisfy you? you think hitler was a hero? what if he wa an actor just like dunnel trump? why were germans called huns? why is it that up until the 1800s the huns were known as muslims? how is it that attila the hun was known as a muslim even before the time of the prophet in both the fomenko timeline and the official history as well? why is it that ethnic germans are living in places like chechnya and turkey, and these people are mysteriously generational muslims? they will tell you they fled the inquisitions. oh but what were these inquisitions? maybe there were no jews in europe, maybe the vatican made jews out of those who remained after their massacres, since the hebrew language and talmud never even fucking existed until they created it? ah yes the jesuit order, what was their founding mission? to convert muslims in europe. you were lied to. even the fucking vikings were muslims. they have koranic verses on their swords. russians too, the emperors even. you can find the shit on ebay even. go ahead and shit all over this thread. I probably wont bother to check back anyway. you people are exhausting. it's more fulfilling to believe in the history you were given. you want to argue with the niggers about who were the real pharaohs? guess what, the pharaohs were dickheads. be my guest. you want to be motivated by hatred of whoever they dangle in front of you, rather than love for your own people? fine. you want to believe the same people who tell you covid is totally real and that 9-11 was carried out by muslims with boxcutters? lol. ok. all the answers are available to you now. you just have to have the bravery to look, and say, "shit, maybe we were fucking lied to"
R: 2 / I: 0

The degradation of the church

I want to get back into religion, my belief has been waining in the last few years but seeing how the world has become I seek guidance and hope for a god to receive my hopes.

All of my local churches are filled with degenracy and sin, should I still start going there again or keep my practises to home?

How do you practice your religions? (I am a protestant christian since birth)
R: 7 / I: 2
All pagan european religions gone forever. They will never be back. At best if you take the hindu stance, some of them will come back in ~400k years when the kali yuga ends.

Catholicism in europe is basically dead. 95% of clergy are either complicit or just do not care. 95% of catholics do not even know the absolute basics that a catechumen has to learn before baptism. No one puts much weigh on what the church says anymore. This will not change.

The sheer amount of ancient beliefs we have lost to 2 waves of puritan anti-religiosity is heart-wrenching. Sometimes I genuinely feel like going crazy, knowing I will never live as they lived.

And to add salt to injury, you are now forced to interact daily with the spiritual heirs of the people who brutally violated, brutally murdered and dismembered at first our ancestral europe and then the christian europe.

I do not mean to blackpill, but I just feel like a person out of my time, there is just nothing for people like me for today's world. I just wait for death with rising anxiety because there is no longer any real religion to subscribe to. Sell-out to abrahamic religions in hopes of heaven, or DIY pagan worship while having less knowledge about it than the arabs of that time did.
R: 23 / I: 2
I started reading the Wikipedia page on it and I’m in love at first sight
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buddhist_ethics

Am I wrong? It aligns with some(secular) beliefs I already have about morality . And to be able to ground them and argue from a moral objective and subjective standpoint sounds awesome.
R: 10 / I: 2

Christian Identity Thread

In this thread, we discuss the politics and tenets of Christian Identity. All are welcome but do not slander our religion. Ask any questions you want, don't be afraid. Debates are welcome. Discuss.
R: 43 / I: 9

Reminder- Christianity is nothing more than a jewish slave farm

This is your average "Christian".

Jews do not give a fuck about Christianity any more. Go around boasting about how youve "found Jesus". Jews will laugh at you and tell you "thats nice, goyim".
R: 6 / I: 0

Religion Tier List

What are your top 3 religions?
Here's mine:
Mormonism
Islam
Taoism
R: 11 / I: 2

Slavic alternatives to Asatru Folk Assembly

I was researching heathen faith and found out about the Asatru Folk Assembly. I'm in love with the idea of an ethnic religious organization that can foster a sense of community among it's people and provide a great influence in raising a family. However, I'm of a very little Germanic decent (less than 25% anglo, scandi and German) so it wouldn't be quite fitting of me to pursue joining the AFA. I'm of mostly slavic decent ( bit more than half) so I was wondering if there are any slavic equivalents to the AFA in the United States.
R: 22 / I: 2

Religion vs Female Promiscuity

Which religion teaches women not to be whores?
>Catholicism has been subverted by kike'd popes
>Christianity is a mixed bag depending on the church and community
>Mormonism seems the most based when it comes to female promiscuity
>Islam is based but has the baggage of attracting subhumans
>The Amish are based but are a small niche group.
R: 4 / I: 1
Have a blessed day, fren.
R: 2 / I: 1

Looking for writing by Nazi priests who left the church

I've heard some chatter about a collection of essays written by priests in Nazi Germany who left the church in favor of joining the SS. Do any of you guys have them, or the Fren Library link? I'm interested in reading it, and I haven't been able to find it otherwise.
R: 5 / I: 0
Opinions on this book? The author is obviously anti-Hitler and he's a bit arrogant in his Christian worldview at times, but imo it's so undervalued having a book that specifically discusses most or all of the "Hitler cult" religions, which happen to be what I relate to the most. I'm hardly familiar with any of the source material to "fact-check" him besides my casual readings of Savitri Devi, Serrano and the videos I've seen posted on bitchute/odysee over the years, so I'm not sure if he's deceptive on any particulars. One thing that I recall him claiming that disappointed me greatly is that apparently (according to him) Hitler never actually attended any Thule Society meetings and the Thule Society stuff is mostly fake.

Any book suggestions would be greatly appreciated, I want to become more religious/spiritual. I hope book-related gives an idea of the stuff I'm into. I don't relate to Christianity at all, nor any other mainstream / normie religions like Asatru. I'm only interested in Aryanism or Hitler cults. I relate to the Hitler worship very easily. I relate A LOT to Savitri Devi for instance. Hitler's life story is so fascinating and he's such an immense figure that I relate to how Savitri Devi must have felt after the war (not to say I'm brave, learned or devout like her), compared to, say, if I wanted to get into Christianity which honestly would 100% feel "larpy" in that it's so far removed from anything I relate to (no offence at all to anyone who gets their itch scratched by Jesus or whatever).

1488
R: 20 / I: 6

What is the Oera Linda book?

I have read some of this book and I don't think it was some elaborate hoax that Over de Linden (owner of the book) could have written as a prank. Then again, much of the history that the Oera Linda book talks about has no basis in recorded history. For instance, the Oera Linda book claims that the ancient Frisians/Germanics developed their own alphabet based on the six-spoked wheel, which is what the book is written in, but said alphabet is never found in European archaeology. The book also claims that ancient Europeans were monotheistic and worshipped the one God named Wralda, but there is no mention of a Wralda figure in any recorded Indo-European mythology. The book also claims that ancient Germanic tribes were organized with a "volksmother" as a figurehead, though Indo-European societies were very patriarchal and there is no mention of such figures. Also the idea of a landmass called Atland sinking in 2194 BC does not have any basis in reality or evidence. That being said, I still encourage frens to read the Oera Linda book to gain information on it, because it is very interesting and probably not a hoax even if much of the writing does not make sense. Was it genuine forgotten/repressed history or was it the work of some archaic occult society in Europe rebelling against Christianization? Thoughts?
R: 38 / I: 6

New religion



New religion
Based on and with respect to christianity
Blend of religion/agnosticism

Agnostic natural law

One god - Male
Created ‘Big Bang’
Specially Created humans beings/sentient life/soul/ via evolution
May have created alien life either now, long ago, in the future, at whatever distance away from or on earth or not at all
God’s order is nature

Doesn’t want you to pray - it’s a waste of time, do something productive
Community halls/churches for community things not worship and talk about scriptures/waste time
Against nihilism - nature doesn’t allow for nihilism (inbuilt mechanisms for survival - e.g. can’t drown yourself, you will try to grab the noose if you hang yourself, only instant death works for suicide)
You only get one life - why waste it, be happy
No animals are nihilistic
The meaning of life is nature
Could be an afterlife, maybe not, nobody knows
Society is natural
Your ancestors are watching you - maybe in an afterlife or/aswell as on the basis of you are standing on there shoulders

On natural disasters/the harsh realities of nature - races should help other communities of the same race (e.g. the neighbouring village of the same race gets flooded

Nihilism is an afforded concept

Atheism is an afforded concept on the foundations of societies built on religion

People always search for meaning

Pro nature
Strength/improvement/growth/Exercise
Having control over ones own mind
Nuclear family - women cannot be poly according to nature, society/humanity collapses unless monogamy is practiced
Society
Traditional gender roles
Arranged marriage
Age of consent is 17/18

Revenge - death penalty is allowed under irrefutable, undeniable evidence (video evidence)
No limits on what foods can be eaten (e.g. not laws like Islamic haram on pork, hindus on beef)

In-between
Alcohol - used for cooking, can be drunk in moderation, not to be used as an escape or to lose control
Abortion - used in cases of rape, risky pregnancy, disabled child, legal to all women but reckless sexual behaviour should be frowned upon

Anti-nature
Laziness - sitting around, watching sports/gaming/being a consumerist
Being fat
Degeneracy
Miscegenation
Drugs - enable an animal to hunt you easily therefore not evolutionary needed, mess up your brain chemicals
Murder

Satan/evil is real
R: 5 / I: 1

Is Abrahamic religion inherently misogynistic?

Is Abrahamic religion inherently misogynistic? The lives of women in Afghanistan have been dropping sharply in quality after it took over recently

>Women's lives under the Taliban has hit rock bottom

>In 2016, having enjoyed an increasing amount of freedom for over a decade, women rated their quality of life more highly than men did. Now they give their lives a rating of just 1.1, compared with men’s 1.5.
>Women have been barred from working in most professions and cannot move freely without being accompanied by a male relative.
>www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2022/12/05/life-under-the-taliban-has-hit-rock-bottom
R: 2 / I: 0
I had a realization last night. I think that souls reborn as niggers are lower on the karmic ladder than souls reborn as actual gorillas.
Gorillas are peaceful and smart, sometimes literally having an IQ higher than entire African countries. They’re not at the top of their respective food chain, but they’re far more capable of defending themselves than other secondary consumers are. Meanwhile, the life of a nigger is one of constant suffering, almost always at the hands of other niggers. Anyone who works in Africa for long enough realizes that they’re utterly incapable of normal human thought.
Am I onto something here?
R: 24 / I: 9

Advent

Happy first Sunday of Advent, frens!
R: 25 / I: 3

Pozzed Bible Quotes

Post pozzed quotes from the bible, I'll start:

>For there is no difference between the jew and the Greek: for the same Lord ouer all, is rich onto all, that call upon him


>I have come to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.
R: 7 / I: 1
Making this short and simple. I've been recently blaming god for the cards that I have been delt in life and though I'm fairly young and nothing is quite definitive why I blame him is for he showed me no signs into further my own belief in him. So i'm not asking to show me evidence on gods existence as I already believe in him but, rather speak to him from the heart rather than the flesh and how that would make me see a sign from God himself. Am I confused about this? My family was never religious but, I see no reason as to why I shouldn't be… but, I'm burden with what I view a curses. Idk I just want a sign
R: 20 / I: 6
Why doesn't God do anything?
He's letting His people(White Men) suffer, but doesn't give us any way to fight the evil.
I'm giving Him until the end of today to do something, otherwise I'm just giving up completely(on Him and life).
R: 31 / I: 8
Why /pol/ never mentioned that Satanosm is so based?
R: 36 / I: 3

I would like to become an Odinist

What are my first steps? How can I call out to Odin?
R: 55 / I: 9
I was going to post this on /pol/, but thankfully the staff had the presence of mind to make /r/, a separate board for religion. We may not all agree on the same things but we should at least agree that we have a right and also a duty to continue to exist.

>The greatest obstacle to the survival of our race is Christianity. Even with all their malice and cunning, the Jews would pose no real threat to the race were it not for their Christian collaborators. In the U.S. just as in South Africa, the Jews may be pulling a lot of strings behind the scenes, but the troops in the war against the White Race are mainly White Christians filled with religious guilt and obsessed with the need to expiate that guilt by sacrificing their own race on the altar of ‘equality’.


>Let us never forget…that Christianity itself is an alien, hostile, racially destructive creed of Jewish origin, and in the future most of those who have fallen under its spell will continue to be our enemies and the enemies of our race.


I could never wrap my head around Christianity. I guess if you find power in it, more power to you. But I think W.L.P. was much smarter than most of you give him credit for. Even as a young kid, the handful of times when I was forced to go to church or Sunday school, I always got the feeling I was being (unsuccessfully) manipulated.

The pastors and instructors could tell I was not buying it and were often scornful and hostile toward me for questioning. No arguments were presented that were in any way believable. I am a strong believer in presenting facts over demanding blind faith. If I can't find facts to back up a claim, why should I have faith?

Also it's worth noting I'm not a viking or a satanist or any of that shit. I don't rule out the possibility of a creator (though its not likely a benevolent or even semi interested creator). I just see no value in making religion a big part of my life. We are all we have in this world. Our problems and our solutions come from each other.
R: 15 / I: 1

What kind of fucked up god has 2 right hands?

Oh, allah does.

The Prophet [SAW] said: "Those who are just and fair will be with Allah, Most High, on thrones of light, at the right hand of the Most Merciful, those who are just in their rulings and in their dealings with their families and those of whom they are in charge." Muhammad (one of the narrators) said in his Hadith: "And both of His hands are right hands."

‏"‏ ‏"‏‏.‏ ‏"‏ ‏"‏‏.‏

Grade: Sahih (Darussalam)
Reference : Sunan an-Nasa'i 5379
In-book reference : Book 49, Hadith 1
English translation : Vol. 6, Book 49, Hadith 5381
R: 1 / I: 0

a Collective Theology of Duty, Loyalty, and Love

In regards to a proper relationship between Gods/Spirits and a Nation. Such a relationship must be one based on the pillars of Duty, Loyalty and Love. A People must bind themselves to a God/Spirit in accordance to such principals.
Duty refers to the fact that a People must have a duty to protect and strengthen whatever Deity(s) they worship, and at the same time a Deity must act and give guidance to a people to preserve their existence. This is NOT indulgence a People in whatever the want but acting in a manner to prevent them from falling into decadence and/or extinction. If a people are acting in such a way it is just for Deity(s) to punish them, but not wipe them out from the face of the Earth. At the same time a People must work with their Deity(s) to strengthen their Deity(s) power and presence, both in this world and in higher worlds.
Loyalty refers to the fact that a People must not betray their Deity(s) and breaking off a connection with a Deity(s) must only be allowed to occur is the Deity(s) is subverting said people.
Love is the fact that the bond between a People and their Deity(s) must be one out of mutual love between said People and Deity(s). By Love I'm not referring to the faggot seance of Love but of a higher understanding of Love. The relationship can NOT be merely transactional which is a mistake that Classical man has made.
All of these bonds and pillars of a relationship have to work both ways, yet must occur with the understanding that Gods/Spirits are higher beings when compared to Man.
Its important to understand that a relationship between Man and Gods/Spirits can't be a relationship between an individual and Deity(s) but a collective one, where the relationship is practiced by ones ancestors and will be practiced by ones decedents. As a relationship continues throughout the generations, it grows stronger with every generation.
R: 2 / I: 0

We wuz jewz and shiet

turns out the niggers really were (some of) the jews. View pic rel, this is from islam.
R: 0 / I: 0
Redpill me on Nostradamus.
R: 288 / I: 32

Jesus was invented AFTER about 1000AD, not 30AD or even 300AD.




Nothing Jewish ever existed until after Roman's arrived.
Nothing Christian existed until about 1000AD.
EVERYTHING is copies of copies of copies and nothing older that 1000AD exists that isn’t almost certainly a fraud or mis-labeled.

What we call the Jewish "religion" today didn't exist until about 600AD.

Not yet sure about Islam but the fact no imagines or text of Jesus existed until about 1000AD means the Koran which mentions Jesus more than Mohammad also didn't exist until about 1000AD so WTF was going on with "Muslim conquest"??? WTF is the "real history" on all that? WTF real records do we have of all those supposed wars that happened fairly recently???

Romans had a strong govt supported program for literacy for all in the likewise govt supported Latin language. Across Europe about 600-700AD nearly all known graves were plundered supposedly to kill vampires, and that is why we have no text of any mementos from graves of the era, supposedly.

Everything prior to my claimed dates can easily be proven fraud to anyone with any common sense. None of the crosses or "last supper" images till 1000AD are Christian but have other meanings.
When pressed, people will mostly present exactly what I just pointed out was all at least LAST created, re-copied(or authored) after 1000AD. Others will present a few somewhat ambiguous artifacts that MIGHT pre-date 1000AD (or might not) such as a singe crude drawing a scarecrow with a horse's head which COULD be Jesus on the Cross, except that there is zero evidence Roman's ever used The Cross as any sort of punishment of anyone for anything ever(ONE ankle bone pierced by ONE nail found in a CARPENTRY SHOP lol). Egyptian religion was still a force and most Egyptian gods were human figures with animal heads including a few horse/donkey, and traveling theater troups (with promoters) was part of Pax Romania. Other offerings as proof of pre-1000AD Christian religion are a few "fragments" of text of early Bible. The few I've seen that come with TRANSLATIONS are very general vague sorta civics/morals about nature of authority and passing judgements, etc, with nothing clearly about Christianity or Jesus, or like some "Governor, what are your thoughts on courts and judges" or something.

Compare this total lack of EXPECTED proofs and artifacts with what actual religions, from much less advanced and productive cultures such as the Mayan from 0AD to 1000AD left behind. We are too this day finding entire large towns with temples and it all checks out and can be dated in several ways, which all jibes with weather records from other dated layers elsewhere, etc.

There are some claims that European years were all changed up sometime during the Dark Ages and several centuries added, and I've not seen this disproved.

What can't be explained is the total lack of artifacts such as "Jesus on the Cross" from 400AD (Roman Empire made Christian) to 1000AD (after which they are common of all types) in not just Europe but North Africa and Asia Minor and MidEast.
Jesus is mentioned in the Koran more than Mohammad and there was supposedly a big Muslim conquest of not just The Sandbox but all the way up into Spain for a few hundred years prior to 1000AD, so WTF about THAT? Interestingly enough, the archaeology on that checks out as well. Exactly zero anything that is clearly Islamic dates prior to 1000AD. EVERYTHING (if in a building that pre-dates 1000AD) will have been “later remodeled”. No Koran, no clearly Islamic symbol with an Arabic (or other) “God is Great”, much less longer phrases. Sure Muslims have a thingy about no pics of Mohammad, but they also got lots of dry land where stuff naturally mummifies or gets buried in sand to be found much later.
R: 3 / I: 0

Hello all of you!

What does your praying voice sound like? Have you trained it?
R: 188 / I: 65

Questions from a Heathen

I apologize in advance if such a thread is frowned upon. I completely understand if you guys want to have your board entirely to the converted.

I am genuinely curious as to how a racialist political worldview (ethno-nationalist, national socialist, etc.) and a universalist religious worldview are reconciled for those of you who are both whatever flavor of Christian and whatever flavor of European ethnic identitarian.

I'd like to hear from the kind of Christian who would rather marry their daughter to Sven the Aryan Pagan, rather than Numilekunolodumare the Bantu Christian. If you'd rather marry your daughter to the Bantu, I don't really have enough of a shared worldview with you to be able to reliably converse, I'm afraid. Also, I'm assuming you're not keen on the rest of the Afro-Asiatics and their religions, since that seems to be a theme among Abrahamics.

Obligatory Disclaimer: I am sure that I will be accused of D&C and victimizing Christians and all that, but I am honestly curious and perfectly willing to engage in polite debate with anyone who will do the same. I am not here to spam my own worldview, but please skip all the usual accusations of being a nihilist/hedonist/atheist etc., because I'm not. My ancestral faith is a lot less progressive than Christianity. Since I'm not an Abrahamic, appealing to Abrahamic scriptural authority probably won't get far. The argument that you're a sinful man and therefore flawed and thus don't need consistency in your worldview is only effective if you're talking to another Abrahamic who agrees with the premise of sin. I do not.

My first questions would be:
a) Why even care about your people, since the material world is considered so sinful and temporary? Why not just live a life strictly according to scripture and then take that sweet afterlife package?

b) Since the supermajority of your ancestors were not Christian, do you really believe that their souls are in some burning lake for eternity right now?

c) How do you reconcile the wish to live among your own people with the scriptural notion that all are equal in the eyes of your god, and all were made in the image of your god?

e) How do you reconcile taking life lessons from Semitic tradition and reading scripture first translated into a European language by Semites, with a racialist worldview? If you believe that Christianity is somehow not of Semitic origin*, why then does all the linguistic and archeological evidence disagree?

*I don't mean whether the physical body of your Messiah was European or not, what I mean is that the very notion of a Messiah, of sin, of eternal bliss in heaven and suffering in hell, all those things are absent to both Paleo-European and Indo-European mythology and culture yet are inherent in Afro-Asiatic, in particular Semitic, mythology and culture.
R: 5 / I: 1
Here it is men, this is the future. We're going all the way back
R: 4 / I: 0
Any of y'all got Cosmotheist lit?
R: 13 / I: 5

Animism

Alright, I got really high this afternoon and did some pranayama in the forest this method here https://youtube.com/watch?v=tybOi4hjZFQ and now I think maybe I feel what you're saying

Varuna is water
Vayu is wind
I am surrounded by gods on all sides, with Vayu in my lungs and Varuna in my veins

This is almost pantheism but you're focusing instead on the practical reality in front of your senses- the micro instead of the macro

This is almost karma yoga

In the Bhagavad Gita one of the 16 methods that Krishna teaches to become enlightened is karma yoga. Where one performs each and every single action, each and every single breath, as an act of love and worship for God

An enlightened karma yogi could be a streetsweeper or a king, and none would know him as an enlightened yogi, or even religious. His intense worship is internal, expressed externally in mundane actions, and goes totally unbeknownst to all around him

To quote Evola-
>It is through this worldview that a part of the spirit of the early Vedic age, despite all, remains alive in the Tantras. In that age humans did not live as ascetics, struggling with the world and with samsara, but rather as free, uninhibited forces, in the company of various gods and spiritual powers, experiencing forms of enlightenment and supernatural energies, rapt in a state of cosmic and triumphant bliss.

To speak this without feeling it is a total larp. However all religions are larping- until they're not. A Christian that has gone to church and prayed on his knees 10,000 times is larping, until the one day and moment it is no longer larping

Larping is common to all religions and is absolutely essential. "Fake it til you make it" or as Buddhists say "cultivating the false to pursue the real'"

Earlier in the woods, on my fourth round of pranayama, the stream next to me genuinely was Varuna. In that moment it was not a larp
R: 56 / I: 12

Atheism is the root of Degeneracy

Our values and traditions were founded on religious teachings. Religion was the backbone of society. Acting as an immune system to shame degeneracy. Now degeneracy is out in the open and being actively pushed by media. Is it no wonder why atheists are the biggest consumers of pozzed media and porn. Their values and traditions were discarded alongside their religion. Replaced with hedonism, nihilism and antinatalism.
R: 19 / I: 5
Aphrodite is an ancient Greeek goddess associated with love, lust, beauty, pleasure, passion, and procreation.

She was syncretizeed with the Roman goddess Venus. Aphrodite Ouranía was an epithet of the goddess Aphrodite, signifying "heavenly" or "spiritual", to distinguish her from her more earthly aspect of Aphrodite Pandemos, "Aphrodite for all the people".

The temple is dialectically opposed to the cult of the predecessor, who shall not be named. Where they stood for alienation, and divisiveness, we stand for brotherhood and unity. All faiths are welcome here. The only forbidden goddess’ name rhymes with "this star", and "banana".

This is the home of the true Army of Beautification. Our purpose is simple: uphold beauty from the heavens in this world, like the golems who support Aphrodite's glorious bust. Through her worship we will set a heavenly standard of divine beauty that will create a powerful, all encompassing, beautifying energy forming the spiritual pillars of our temple.A thread started in her name will commence the festival of Aphrodisia.

The ways to demonstrate your worship are to write prayers, and bump the thread to keep the temple's beautifying energy alive as often as possible. All of Aphrodite’s representations in art are welcome, whether it be drawn or real life art. The manifestation of our goddesses' divine beauty in women is also allowed, and posting beautiful female specimens is encouraged as long as blue board rules are followed. The ideal is real natural female beauty as the goddess intended, with makeup allowed within limits, not unnatural artificial plastic surgery “beauty”.There is only one general rule for the temple: Aphrodite has graced us with natural love and pleasures. Any deviations away from this essence will result in expulsion from the temple. The purity of divine feminine beauty must be protected, no corruptions allowed.

Aphrodisiac - A substance which increases sexual arousal.

Musics https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hEZ5fXZRz4M
R: 17 / I: 0

All Christian denominations are promoting the luciferian doctrine

Modern "Christianity" is satanism in disguise.
R: 8 / I: 3
https://www.idrlabs.com/philosopher-personality/test.php

really surprised by Hume, I've never read anything from him and always just assumed he's from the Anglo-style libtard tradition, sort of like a proto-John Stuart Mill. Is there a "based" reading of Hume? I disagree with almost all of what his wikipedia article highlights from him.
R: 2 / I: 0

Using religion for gibs?

Anyone ever pretend to be a religion for gibs? Every actually believe in a religion and receive something for it?

No vaccines, halal, kosher, Jainist no animal products/vegan food, hospitals, prisons, schools etc..

How far do religious protections go? May I hate gay peoples and women and use my Muslim religion to prevent myself from being fired pr else lawsuits?
R: 47 / I: 19
Is idol worship a key factor in European spirituality? Even Christians have Jesus and the cross as idols to worship and devote themselves to.

Worshipping what is beyond our sense perception (God) seems impractical and difficult, especially when life distracts us.

In Islam they have set prayers 5 times a day and historically hell bent on destroying idols and all history prior to Muhammad. Even images of living things are traditionally banned in Islam.

The downfall of idols is that they can be destroyed etc. Of course evermore new versions can be created, just look how many images of jesus, or crosses there are. Good luck erasing or defiling every single one out of existence.

In Japanese Shinto they believe an object gains a soul after 100 years. So imagine a statue that is created with the intention for worship and many people focus their worship on it for generations. It would possibly gain some type of aura or power.

In ancient mythologies/histories of Europe like the odyssey and aeneid they go to a sacred statue, offer it libations and sacrifice, pray and do rituals then wait for it to show them a sign. Aeneas fell asleep under the statue waiting and it was then in a dream the goddess showed him his destiny.

Our work, therefore, would be to recreate the images of European Gods in the image of our people and then do all the rituals possible to ensoul these idols with power. Make so many that no Christian, commie, jew or Muslim etc can destroy them all. Hide them in underground caves or deep in forests. Let's resurrect the gods of our ancient forefathers, frens.
R: 15 / I: 6

Plotinus on the Gnostics

>Do not suppose that a man becomes good by despising the world and all the beauties that are in it. The Gnostics have no right to profess respect for the gods of the world above. When we love a person, we love all that belongs to him; we extend to the children the affection we feel for the parent. Now every Soul is a daughter of the Godhead. How can this world be separated from the spiritual world? Those who despise what is so nearly akin to the spiritual world, prove that they know nothing of the spiritual world, except in name.

>Let any individual soul make itself worthy to contemplate the Great Soul by ridding itself, through quiet recollection, of deceit and of all that bewitches vulgar souls. For it let all be quiet; let all its environment be at peace. Let the earth be quiet and the sea and air, and the heaven itself waiting. Let it observe how the Soul flows in from all sides into the resting world, pours itself into it, penetrates it and illumines it. Even as the bright beams of the sun enlighten a dark cloud and give it a golden border, so the Soul when it enters into the body of the heaven gives it life and timeless beauty and awakens it from sleep. So the world, grounded in a timeless movement by the Soul which suffuses it with intelligence, becomes a living and blessed being.


>The Soul gives itself to every point in this vast body, and vouchsafes its being to every part, great and small, though these parts are divided in space and manner of disposition, and though some are opposed to each other, others dependent on each other. But the Soul is not divided, nor does it split up in order to give life to each individual. All things live by the Soul in its entirety; it is all present everywhere. The heaven, vast and various as it is, is one by the power of the Soul, and by it is this universe of ours Divine. The sun too is Divine, and so are the stars; and we ourselves, if we are worth anything, are so on account of the Soul. Be persuaded that by it thou can attain to God. And know that thou wilt not have to go far afield.
R: 44 / I: 16

Volkisch Awakening

All Good Aryan men, cast down the abrahamic poison of our enemy. I ask that you have courage to find your indigenous Volkisch Traditions, they are all that are truly Good. Christianity merely pretends to be good. It is a ruse. What you see in it is the innocence and beauty that is within you, not what is in christianity. You don't belong to it, because what is genetically and racially within you is where the good is found, not in an institution. An institution cannot be good, it is You that is good. Christianity has been corrupt from the very beginning. Read Deschner's Criminal History of Christianity and you will see it was evil from the beginning. The ideas you have about christianity, the good people in it who you know, who are your family, those you trust, they are Good not because they are christian, they are good because they are European and Aryan. It is a genetic trait not a belief. Every single thing you want as a christian, if you truly want that, to have strong honourable white families and people of good moral character, and where what is sacred can be protected, and where we have the freedom to self determine our racial future, if you truly want that, you can only find it in indigenous racial Volkisch traditions. A Theocratic Racially Exclusive Volkisch state is all that will free us. Racism is and has always been Volkisch.
R: 20 / I: 1

Jesus loves you

Just know that Jesus loves you.
Avoid sin and repent when you do sin and you will feel the warmth of Christ's love, even in the hardest of times.
If Jesus loves you, then who are you to not love yourself.

Take the Christ pill.
R: 2 / I: 0

Janus

What spiritual significance was the Temple of Janus for the Romans? It was a temple that they used during war but I couldn't find out what rituals or spirits were present at the temple. Clearly at this point in time we need a warrior religion.
R: 18 / I: 31

Dharmic & Aryan Philosophy

Dharmic is (adherence to) cosmic law and Aryan is (adherence to) noble action. Arya is the folk and Dharma is the duty.

This includes not only (h)Induism, Buddhism, Germanic/Norse paths but also the broad strokes of Zoroastrianism, Proto-Indo-Europa, Scythian beliefs as well as White Jainism on the edges.
R: 21 / I: 4

Is Robert Sepehr based?

I dont know if I should post this thread on /x/ or here.

Is Robert Sepehr based? Ive read somewhere that he is untrustworthy due to the fact that he is a kike but so far I really enjoy his books/videos.

What are /r/s opinions on him?
R: 22 / I: 4

"Galahaurn" Sharing the works of my Pagan French Bro

"France is the most European of the European nations.

Its name is Germanic;

its language is Latin;

the background of its people is Celtic;

its sense of state is Roman;

its intellectual and artistic rigour is ancient Greek.

It is the only one that has direct access to the North Sea, the Atlantic Ocean and the Mediterranean; and whose frontier provinces can serve as intermediaries through their language and their population."

Pierre Sidos

If Europe, and through it the white race, were ever to unite for survival, it would come from here.

Deal with it

14/88
R: 19 / I: 4

I am a bible reader but i think there is something to hinduism and other religions

I had an experience involving rudra and received what i believe would be considered a gift or boon on numerous occassions. I prayed to God about it but in my prayer i said is rudra just like an aspect of your spirit like an angel. I didnt get an answer so im guessing im on the right track. It started with something i experienced while in a deep meditation and gradually progressed over the course of many weeks. Rudra is personified as creating the universe by roaring in hindi.
R: 10 / I: 1

Utilizing Logical Antecedents, Avoiding Labels, Refusing to Repeat the Past

Survival strategy/prelude to a new weltanschauung

Essentially this thread is about sharing what has worked for me and bringing up some important points that need to be addressed which are either overlooked or handled poorly, especially in dissident circles.

First what I mean by utilizing logical antecedents is to avoid frivolous or time consuming arguments/discussions about minutia and/or individual issues and instead focus on the root issue. Most problems today stem from people having a flawed foundation, don't try pruning the individual branches instead rip it out by the roots. The best example of this is the "equality" lie. Tackling the subject of race with race deniers, or sexual dimorphism with the assorted feminist and deviant supporters, is not a fruitful endeavor because of the conditioning involved. This is even true of the apolitical types with an ostensibly "soft" position on those topics. Instead it seems to work best if you discuss the logical antecedents from which the truth about race and sex follow. Natural Laws broadly speaking, but specifically about survival. Learn about about animals and nature so you can use examples too, or even just bring it up from time to time as an interesting fact etc.. What is the nature of survival, what does it mean? In the Ultimate sense it is the propagation of DNA for a group throughout time, without hybridization and following biological laws of inheritance. The part many people seem to get wrong is conflating a view that prioritizes survival based on Natural Law with "Social Darwinism" when applied to social animals. "Social Darwinism" is in fact Anti-social and not Darwinian, it causes the destruction of healthy societies and weakens them, and is closer to what we have today than anything actually concerned with survival. The point here is; who can actually argue against survival? If they do they make the point that they are either a complete fool or a mortal enemy to any observers of the discussion. Existence is the prerequisite for everything and anything, and one must continue to survive if one is to exist. That means any morals or principles which hinder survival, or seek to replace it as the most important principle, must be done away with. Morals are meaningless without someone to pass them on and children to carry them into the future, and without future generations history will be controlled by those that do survive and thus seen through their lens, censoring what they wish to censor and manipulating facts as it suits them. Establishing this baseline and working with axiomatic principles completely derails any and all arguments based on the equality lie or the self-destructive wanton charity where resources, labor, and territory are given to other competing groups. This can also form the basis for a philosophy of a group which can be formed to aid in coordination and networking, avoiding anything explicitly racial or political and acting as a lightning rod for healthy minded people.

If you are speaking to someone whom already has an existing issue or grievance with modernity, such as "wokeness" or feminism, leverage that issue into opening their eyes to see the bigger picture. Do just enough so they begin seeing the patterns, the many hypocrisies and double standards. Connect that issue with other issues, and connect that to a cause while providing the solution as well. Destroying or even destabilizing someone's worldview often causes them to become emotional, they become hostile to you and shut down if not provided something to replace it with and even then it may still happen depending on how attached to their delusions of racial harmony and a progressive future utopia they are.

I have been relatively successful with the above, and I also regret how few others that supposedly understand what's going accept what was said. I find some "dissidents" will actually argue about it, primarily Christians.

Avoiding labels is a bit of a no-brainer but the content of an idea matters and not its label. So if the question is ever "should I use or refer to something as "x" when "x" generates a reflexive response from most people due to Pavlovian conditioning", the answer is an obvious "NO". There's more than one way reference something, discuss it, etc.

Refusing to repeat the past is just that, utilize that creativity. Take what's good from the past and build upon it. We have more information today than at any previous time, so there is no excuse for returning to the past and repeating it as if it is the solution today, in many cases it is what resulted in what we see today so it clearly didn't work, in other cases it might have worked but for other circumstances however it is simply anachronistic or without proper context to work today. That doesn't mean the positive elements can't be retained and combined to formulate something NEW. Survival is about ADAPTATION, mere repetition is foolish. Anything our forebears did we are capable of doing, and as mentioned previously, the fact we have more information means we have no excuse not to further IMPROVE upon what has been done in the past and worked out for us.

The final issue which gets sticky especially regarding religious types is morality, and I'm not bringing this up to be disrespectful or to "DnC", I think it's necessary. There needs to be an actual serious and productive discussion about the validity and utility of religion in general, and Christianity or Odinism in particular (but not limited to them or other existing or yet to exist religions either). It's a matter of what is best for maintaining a healthy mentality, especially regarding reasoning and perception of reality. This is important because it's best if people are on the same page, otherwise existing fracture points can and will be leveraged open in the future in the event we actually start being successful. The moral paradigm today is a self-destructive farce for which the groundwork was laid by Christianity. While it is not wholly Christian (obviously) it is a secular spiritual descendant. There's also a strong correlation between it and reality distorting views such as "flat Earth" and "germ theory is fake" among many other things showing that it opens one up to being misled about the nature of this reality, which makes one easy to fool and manipulate. We need a new moral paradigm based on objective facts such as survival and vitality, survival in the aforementioned sense. Survival is not a Universal principle though, because one cannot value the survival of their group and that of a competing group at the same time, one must prioritize the survival of their own group.
R: 6 / I: 1

Is Transhumanism a Materialist Religion

most of you guys seem to oppose materialism, along with the direction that modern technology is taking civilization into. Do you see transhumanism as the end result of modern ideology?
R: 2 / I: 1
What if Ceaser Augustace is the true christ, and Jesus, or Yeshua is the anti-christ?
R: 23 / I: 4

Religion From Secularism

ITT we discuss how religious concepts and movements can arise from critical analysis of the universe from a secular point of view.
Examples:

Deterministic argument for reincarnation
> Assume the entire universe, including human consciousness is entirely deterministic. As far as modern science is able to tell, this is the case.
> As the universe is deterministic, 'free will', 'souls', etc do not exist.
> Consciousness, 'will', etc are therefore illusory phenomena arising from entirely deterministic systems.
> Therefore, the entirely deterministic system that is 'the universe' is essentially convincing itself that it is having a subjective experience with 'free will', but in reality distinguishing between 'dead' matter and 'alive' matter are meaningless because they are all the same thing.
> There is no way to determine why or how the subjective experience that is 'you' is having the subjective experience you are currently experiencing, as opposed to any other subjective experience currently occurring in the universe.
> There is no reason to assume that illusory subjective experiences will stop happening after the subjective experience that is 'you' stops experiencing things.
> This is fundamentally indistinguishable from reincarnation, from the subjective observer's point of view.
> Every good or bad deed done to another subjective experience, you will experience, as you are the universe experiencing all subjective experiences.
> Atman is Brahman, god has perfect justice, QED

Deterministic argument for 'will of god'
> As the entire universe is deterministic, any 'true will' that is not an illusion must be external to the universe.
> Whatever set the beginning state of the universe is external to the universe
> Whatever set the beginning state of the universe must then have the quality of 'will', whether or not it is a 'true will' (non-illusory) is a matter for debate.
R: 36 / I: 4

Islam general

firstly there are two types of Muslims, Sunni (eg. Saudis) and Shi'ite (eg. Iran)

The Sunni's are considered the more extreme, and have the more violent elements like Salafists
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salafi_movement

…and Wahabists (Jihad)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wahhabism

however all Muslims are taught to practice Taqiya, lying to the infidel (you and I) in order to further the goals of Islam… https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiya
R: 40 / I: 13
I find it hard to leave Christianity completely and convert to asatru because I am afraid of going to hell
R: 5 / I: 2
Jesus and Odin are the same person. GOT/Christ/WOTAN was a Germanic/Atlantean King who crucified himself to gain knowledge of the runes.

THE BIBLE has SOME truth in it but it was completely rewritten/fabricated to make it into a jewish worship book. There is SO MUCH faked and falsified history in the world.
R: 0 / I: 0
>"For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted."- Matthew 23:12

>"The highest good is like water. Water gives life to the ten thousand things and does not strive. It flows in places men reject and so is like the Tao."- Daodejing


>"The law of heaven takes from those who are arrogant and benefits those who are humble. The law of earth will not allow those who are conceited or self-content to always remain that way, but will bring change upon them. The humble will not wither, but shall be replenished, just as flowing water fills up lower places on the ground as it passes by, making up the differences. The law of spirits and gods bring harm to those who are arrogant and fortune to those who are humble. Even the laws of men despise the arrogant and like the humble."- Liao-Fan's four lessons
R: 4 / I: 2

A Synthesis of Esoteric Hitlerism and Gnosticism

Demiurge = Lightning
Sophia = Sun

Thoughts?
R: 34 / I: 7

The Church and the Third Reich

Recently i read a book called "Entre la Iglesia y el Tercer Reich"
by the P. Julio Meinvielle, and what i found was interesting and i would like to share this whit you guys.

As a National Socialist and a Christian ive always been told that National Socialism was Christian and promoted Christianity as an alternative to Moralless Atheism(And i still believe that Atheism was not accepted in the Third Reich)but how much power did the Church and Christianity truly have in the Third Reich? Many times you hear on National Socialist discussions that Christianity was defended in the Third Reich, the 1000 thousand Churches that where re-opened by the Third Reich, and that Goebbels, Hitler and many other officials where Christians and on defense of Christianity, and i agreed so far until i read this book and i think he explains really well the situation on the Third Reich wich can be summarized as:
>"The German persecution is not bloody like that of Mexico, Spain or Russia, but it is terrible and perhaps more pernicious. What is the tactic used in Germany to nullify the influence of the Catholic Church? It consists in depriving it of all means of influencing the masses, even Catholics, of the German population, while on the other hand a grandiose offensive is being carried out to paganize it."

And it makes sense. The Reichskonkordat that took place in 1933 appears to be in support of The Church religious freedom and you are constantly told that it purely means that religious forces werent allowed on politics, as explained in the document. But what was the understanding of "Politics" in the Third Reich? Goebbels wrote on the Voelkischer Beobachter on 14.7.36:
>"We dont understand as political the deed of taking occupation on the material things of a people, Politics has taken on our eyes a more Extense character. It means to deal in any way whit the issues wich in any way are related to the people."

What does this mean? that the all Churches in Germany where effectively swept off the public life, and after this the National Socialist goverment in 1934 assigned Alfred Rosenberg as the NSDAP Commissioner for the Supervision of Intellectual and Ideological Education (Who wrote the Myth of the 20th Century, a book SLIGHTLY critical of Christianity) And it was downhill for Christianity in the Third Reich from there. Catholic Christian Youth organizations were oppresed, Catholic Priests and Leaders were imprissioned, Christianity almost literally couldnt be proffesed in public, Church attendance plummeted, bla bla. Anyways, you can read the book if you want, its interesting but i have no idea if its in English.


So i wonder, what do you guys think about what is said? Have you read this book or any other book about the issue? Is it true? And if so, why do people dont accept the Third Reich was Increasingly neo-pagan? I would also like any other Religion and Third Reich related book recommendations you guys can have, be sure to share.
R: 2 / I: 0

Epiphany - Understanding the Modern World

I've suddenly come to understand why modern jews work so hard to corrupt and ruin the west and Christianity.
After WW 2 there was a spiritual revival in Germany, as well as an economical one. God was basically blessing this nation. If it kept going, this land would eventually, together with other christian european countries, become way too much powerful, in a way that jews wouldn't be able to prevent an uprising against their system of usury, which is what all of their power is based on (including the control of information). It was predicted by them that eventually the majority of white people, with the help of free information and education, would become aware of the jewish crimes against humanity and to what extent and intensity their poison corrupts us. Jewdom would then be put down once and for all; Satan's most faithful and effective servants would be neutralized and the whole world would be free of their tiranny.
But not if they are able to dumb whites down and feed them lies by controlling all sources of information; besides curbing their economical and military dependance. In this way the beast can maintain its power until the second and final coming of the true Messiah, thus fulfilling the Bible prophecies on the end times. This is why the Axis had to lose WWII and the Allies feed the beast.
It is ultimately a battle of Satan against Christ and His Word.
R: 30 / I: 21

Is there a way to build a new religion out of perennialism?

I want a quintessential Aryan faith combining all the different branches of Indo-European wisdom.
R: 4 / I: 0

I am an Odinist gnostic Christian magician occultist

Anyone else like this?
R: 5 / I: 1

Dieist or Atheist?

Are you an atheist? Do you really think this all came out of nothing?

The Big Bang is brought to you by the same scientists that got caught lying about climate change, COVID, Ivermectin, and monkey-human evolution. They get taxpayer grant money to lie to you.

Did the Big Bang just happen or did someone make it happen?
R: 3 / I: 1

Feminism = satanic witchcraft

Look folks, here writes one with understanding.
I can distinguish the spirits of persons and of their movements.
The satanic witches are running wild in our society, effectively putrifying everything and every soul through their fornication.
You make them successful, whenever you even look at a woman who is not yours with lust. Yes, even sitting behind a screen you are losing battles to them and their master, the dragon, aka Behemoth, Satan.
R: 0 / I: 0

What is the Oera Linda book?

I have read some of this book and I don't think it was some elaborate hoax that Over de Linden (owner of the book) could have written as a prank. Then again, much of the history that the Oera Linda book talks about has no basis in recorded history. For instance, the Oera Linda book claims that the ancient Frisians/Germanics developed their own alphabet based on the six-spoked wheel, which is what the book is written in, but said alphabet is never found in European archaeology. The book also claims that ancient Europeans were monotheistic and worshipped the one God named Wralda, but there is no mention of a Wralda figure in any recorded Indo-European mythology. The book also claims that ancient Germanic tribes were organized with a "volksmother" as a figurehead, though Indo-European societies were very patriarchal and there is no mention of such figures. Also the idea of a landmass called Atland sinking in 2194 BC does not have any basis in reality or evidence. That being said, I still encourage frens to read the Oera Linda book to gain information on it, because it is very interesting and probably not a hoax even if much of the writing does not make sense. Was it genuine forgotten/repressed history or was it the work of some archaic occult society in Europe rebelling against Christianization? Thoughts?
R: 0 / I: 0

Where does it all go from here?

The Asatru and Odinist types I have seen for years now I used to ignore their posts and ideas. But when I looked deeper I was surprised to find that there was something more to it. It even brought me closer to my ancestors when I started to really ponder it. And from what I can tell the real non cucked Asatru people are allot more organized than what rivaling groups make it put to be.

In the middle of Globohomo America there stands 4 hofs. 4 hofs where only memebers of the Aryan race can apart of. I see that the community is not big but it is there. In the brown future of America I wouldnt even be surprised that practicing Asatru Aryans will be a key factor in the population growth of Whites.

Being White isn't the only thing that draws us together. Religon is the great divider within the White race and religon can be a glue and a sound foundation for a people.

I hope to see the further growth in the community and hope people can break away from Zog(or Jog) and return to their people.
R: 4 / I: 0

How can one stop thinking Witchcraft is Satanic?

I know that Witchcraft/Wicca/Paganism being Satanic is all bullshit made up by (((Hollywood))), but I just… can't make myself let go of that thought.

I fear that I'm turning my back on God by being a Pagan, and I'll end up in Hell because of it.

Also, I don't think pentagrams are evil, people just like using them for bad shit.
R: 12 / I: 1

How do you get started with and learn about Norse/Germanic Paganism?

What are good resources to learn about it and how do you start practicing it? I know I could "jUsT gOoGle It" but I'd have to comb through retarded bullshit for hours, I hope some of you can lead me in the right direction
R: 9 / I: 1

Pagan Bands

Anyone know of any good Pagan bands or musicians?

I've been listening to Inkubus Sukkubus and Jana Runnalls lately
R: 3 / I: 1
Is it worth reading the Bhagavad Gita? Has anyone here read it?
R: 9 / I: 3
Mohamed is a Prophet to all nations, not the Arabs. You are welcome to God’s religion.


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=O8s-nFEDrAo
R: 14 / I: 5
Yahweh is not God. Yahweh = Moloch = Samael = Demiurge = Yaldaboth.
R: 2 / I: 4

The necessity of Chaos

Many people do not understand how old the concept of a chaos god is and how absolutely necessary this aspect was to creation itself. The distinction and realization of the entity post-dates its need by a time that is truly inconceivable by man as it was sometime before the creation of the universe itself. By necessity or coincidence the god of creation conspired with the god of chaos. Without the two together nothing would be recognizable. The chaos of entropy drove what we call the first creation, but the organization of the harmonic wave is intrinsically contained within all.

This universe of ours is the twisted effect of both order and disorder and the most extremes are very unfriendly to our human forms. Both are so absolutely necessary as the first interaction of the two on this plane resulted in the beginning of everything we understand in association with matter and its side effects. That being said I advise against worship of the chaos gods as you may not like the outcome. Sometimes it is best to not draw attention to yourself. To call the deities, their avatars and vessels evil is an incomplete description but you may not be incorrect.
R: 2 / I: 0
Anyone else listen to Samaneri Jayasara? She's a Theravada Buddhist monk that makes excellent audiobooks from all religious traditions, so she has clear perennialist leanings as well. She has excellent taste and makes great videos
https://youtube.com/c/SamaneriJayasara/playlists

Here's my favorite video from her, from Ramana Maharshi
https://youtube.com/watch?v=llNXkEkAfiQ

This is her Christian playlist
https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLWzYrEdlV4O4JO70WfrF7hc_WPVAqDcdj
R: 12 / I: 3

Did people really used to worship statues?

In a lot of Islamic/Old testament stories they talk about people worshiping "idols" in place of god. Usually these are statues or other physical objects which serve as visual representations of various deities. However, the authors rarely distinguish between the images themselves and the beings they represent, so that destroying the images actually destroys the god.

Did anyone actually believe in statues as gods or was it more like Hindus or Catholics venerating icons today?
R: 5 / I: 1

I believe in 'the' God but other ones as well?

Is this Polytheism? Or am I just undecided on what religion I want to be part of?
R: 9 / I: 1

Religion and suffering

Religion has this relationship with suffering.
Most religions exist to mitigate suffering in some form, and to mediate between man and the world.

When suffering is reduced, religiosity also drops.
When suffering rises, so does religiosity.
Albeit, I still consider "no atheists in foxholes" to be a fallacious statement; plenty of people are exposed to things that make them lose their connection to the sacredness of the world.

Still, other people are only confirmed in their belief in the sacred.
Sometimes by the same events.

When you look into hell on earth, you might see The Devil.
But you might also see God.

What is the correct relationship of religion to suffering?
Is religion too concerned with suffering?
Is duty more important than mitigation of suffering?
Does duty lead to mitigation of suffering through other means?

Are these even the right questions to be asking?
R: 5 / I: 1

Curse of Cain

What are the political implications that ancient near eastern people developed a mythology around a specific enemy tribe with certain characteristics that seem to be evident today in another group that views themselves as a specific tribe with those exact characteristics.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curse_and_mark_of_Cain

The curse is two parts.
> Should Cain attempt to farm the land, the earth would not yield produce for him.
> The second part of the curse marks Cain as a fugitive and a wanderer
So the curse of cain is attached to a group of people who do not farm or produce value from the land, live in cities and are nomadic, moving from city to city, a fugitive implying they are driven out of one city to seek refuge in another.

Now here comes the important part.
>In the stories, if someone harmed Cain, the damage would come back sevenfold.
Jews are MASOCHISTS, their entire identity is victimhood kvetching, they have adapted to thrive off being victims and on some level they LOVE it, it makes them feel special. You deal with jews by letting them become victims of their own behavior.

Is this myth perhaps developed as a story to warn others to identify the tribe or tribes that have developed this specific parasitic survival strategy in the early cities? How does this myth help us understand how to deal with these same parasites that seem to be so prolific today?
R: 1 / I: 0

Karma and morality question.

Karma and stuff and question am I owed a debt how do I get what I deserve or make them get what they deserve? I feel I was wronged correct me if I’m wrong…

I had my genitals mutilated as a innocent child permanently and irreversibly damaging my only body. MGM is immoral. When a Tesla employee gets millions of dollars for mean words and drawings and then quits his job. The Tesla company itself has to pay millions to him not the other coworkers who said the mean words. Am I not entitled to say at least 30 million dollars and the lifestyle that comes along with that(which would include having a girlfriend If I wanted one which I do) paid to me by the hospital I was born in and the hospital that I had my genitals mutilated in against my will? If I am entitled to this money(which I believe I am tell me if I am right or wrong below) and I do not get my reparations money does this mean I can morally get retribution instead? I won’t say how that part(retribution instead of reparations) could work since this a blue board but I can’t see me working 50 years or any years knowing I am entitled to a rich comfy life or at least justice then peace for me. Here Tesla man link he will never have to work because of mean words so why should I? https://teslanorth.com/2022/06/22/ex-tesla-employee-rejects-15-million-settlement-in-race-bias-lawsuit/
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thoughts?

Am I wrong?

How do I get what I deserve?

What do they deserve?

I need real advice here. I am going to run out of money very soon. I am never going to be employed again as I deserve millions and me working and Tesla man retiring is not fair. What are my options? I want to live a long happy healthy life…..

I WANT TO LIVE A LONG UNEMPLOYED HAPPY HEALTHY LIFE! I WANT A GIRLFRIEND! I WANT CHILDREN! I DESERVE THIS!

HELP!!!!!
R: 6 / I: 1

Thoughts on cosmotheism?

It's worldview on the natural life laws of struggle, fertility and family are great. The goal to embrace struggle for the advancement of man to higher man is a admirable concept imo? What about y'all.
R: 5 / I: 0

heres my religious views

so it goes something like this: first there was chaos, so god seperated good from evil, this then gave birth to the first beings, manifest through twins, one good, one evil, the good twin killed the evil twin because he wanted his being to be pure, this then gave birth to the first world, but this was an evil world which wanted to be good, thus it was neither, so god killed the good twin to make the other half of the world, this then created an ordered chaos and gave rise to beings differing in good and evil, animals, which, the more each generation reconciled their good and evil, and simmered down their internal chaos, were given by god back the privilege of human intellect, while those who failed to do so continued to be animals, then god cast the first priest-king, whom invented the first proto-human religion and stateform, the first warrior, whom conquered the first human territory/country, and the first craftsmen, whom invented the first city, their purpose is to channel the order god created which gave rise to the transformative first man through their divinely assigned occupations, each nation is basically a variety of these three and has to reclaim it, there are also 3 prophets whom came to affirm each, zarathustra to the priests and kings, buddha to the people and craftsmen, and finally a warrior prophet whom will be a kind of liberator-messiah, he hasnt appeared yet
R: 15 / I: 4

Why aren't you Gnostic?

Gnosticism:
>you worship a beautiful mommy Goddess
>fight against the bad guy
>team up with the good ones
>play inside the matrix
>become aware of who is real and whos not(hylics and psychics)
>ignore the npcs
>be the protagonist
>experience enlightenment
>save yourself and enter the real heaven, become One with the real God (Good ending)

Christianity:
>worship the father (a old man (thats gay af and pedophile incest))
>team up with Jesus (he end ups becoming the protagonist of the story, not you, basically you get cucked)
>needlesly hate yourself for something your ancestors did (be a cuck)
>enter the fake heaven and get cucked by the trinity (bad ending)

There literally 0 reason for you to choose christianity over Gnosticism, unless you are a cuck and a faggot
R: 1 / I: 0
Do jews really worship Saturn? I want to learn more Judaism so I can learn my enemy better.
R: 83 / I: 29
The idea that God is benevolent and an omnipotent protector is one of the most appalling and repulsive things.
Atheists carry this idea as a means to reject Christianity, and Christians carry this sentiment for a sense of comfort.
The truth is that God values free-will over comfort and safety. God will let you be raped as a child just as he’d let you rape a child. God will stand by as you poison a village or manipulate others or make permanent, damaging decisions. God will stand by as Satanic fraternities form and destroy mankind and culture and the family. God will “allow” the most heinous and unimaginable acts.
There’s no evil thing that you could will, that God will interrupt or intervene. Nonetheless, it breaks God’s heart that you reject him. It breaks his heart because he knows the long game. He knows your demise, what you’ve traded for Earthly gains.

Both Christians and Atheists should drop the sentiment God adheres to the human idea of Good/Bad. God’s highest principle is allowing our free-will; no matter who hurts, no matter who is raped or murdered, no matter what is lost. No amount of pain, suffering, and bloodshed is more important than God’s appraisal of free-will.

And all while the Godless commit these murders and transgressions and Godless acts, the victims will blame the God rather than the Godless. Fair enough, because you’re told all your life that God is good. You’re told all your life that if you ask, you’ll receive. What about when you asked for your Godless uncle to stop raping you? Now you hold God accountable for the actions of the Godless, you hold God accountable for the lies you were told about him.
The Christian God is one of the most terrifying and darkest concepts to have ever been conceived. There is absolutely nothing darker and abysmal, there’s nothing that can invoke the greatest fear than the sentiment that the most righteous face the most suffering.
If you dare follow Christ to the T, you’ll be betrayed, crucified, and crucified. You won’t be comfortable and safe, you’ll be tortured and forsaken and any moment you don’t face inconceivable suffering should be met with unrelenting gratitude. The only necessary prayer is one thanking every second you and your loved ones are spared of absolute torment and suffering.
R: 15 / I: 2
Adam and Eve
>Woman is of Man, Man in God’s image
>Eve was deceived, and then deceived Adam

Solomon
>Granted God’s wisdom
>Seduced into betraying God by an attractive woman

It appears both God and man contends with a rather effective and ever-present force which is women are more receptive to. In my opinion, I believe intuition is what receives this.
It’s said that intuition is the female’s primary function, just as reason is a man’s primary function.
2 years ago, I realized that intuition was one of the major keys I was missing from my being. I realized how many bullets I could’ve dodged with intuition. I realized what women’s choices were based on intuition. I notice Adam was meant to acknowledge Eve’s intuition and have a greater reason.

Intuition is meant to inhabit and serve boundaries established in reason, while at times intuition can prove weakness and need to expansion in said boundaries. Man being foreign to intuition, it seems to be his downfall. We can be so certain that intuition is unreasonable or unreliable, when it’s a crucially significant ingredient.
My assumption is there can’t be a gospel on intuition or the mechanics of woman because God is man and his assertions aren’t fluid and “intuitive”.
Woman is as changing as her “man”, whether individually or collectively. Man also changes but he always adheres to somewhat oscillating framework of masculinity, or so I speculate;
gospel is inherently compatible with men while women are only as compatible with the gospel as men are.
I’m posting this for feedback/criticism, thanks in advance for either.
R: 0 / I: 0

A Message to Frens

After you kept taking down those MillionPity Monkey Molesters they tried to blame you for their CP and dead women spam onto lolcow.farm. They wish to make as much infighting on altchans as possible to cover and hide from us all. I am simply someone who also feeds on the misery of the evil and wicked, which yes, makes me wicked. But from one beast to another, heads up.
R: 36 / I: 11
This is political. Do not move to /r/ or /x/.



Alright boys and girls. fuck it. Let’s codify our theory a little.
I’m going to list out what I believe to be true.

God is the everlasting consciousness and father of all things.
God created the universe.

God created humans on earth and/or used ancient aliens to do it.
Adam and Eve are not the first humans. They are the first white Aryans.

The ancient Aryans seeded on earth by extraterrestrials in The Garden of Eden/Hyperborea fall from grace.
Adultery is the sin of race mixing.
Ancient Aryan race loses it’s potency.

Further on down the road, humanity has become more mixed. There are still different races but they don’t differ that greatly from one another.

Israelite branch leaves middle east about 600bc for new world. (Book of Mormon)
The Old Testament is like 1% of Aryan history which has been appropriated by jews.
Jews are an artificial artificial intelligence android type creation with no soul made by “Satan” at some point prior to the coming of Jesus.
Jesus, the son of God/God in the flesh, is born alongside the jews.
Jews are the only ones debased enough to kill the son of God.
This is part of the plan. Jesus teaches us to beware the jewish menace.

Different alien races have been making partial hybrids with humans.
They see our debasement and many alien species are far closer to God than us. This is why they are so advanced. They are connected with the supreme consciousness and in line with natural design. They want to help us.

1820: Jospeh Smith chosen by God to restore His church.

20th century Germans revive Aryan spirit.
They lose the battle but the war continues. The point was that they revived us and brought us closer to God.
R: 7 / I: 2

Steelmanning God

What does /r/ think of this argument for the existence of God?
TL;DW: There will be a technological singularity in the future, which will create an AI that becomes God. If eternalism is true, the future already physically exists. Therefore, God exists.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jxYbA1pt8LA
R: 4 / I: 0

The best book I have read on God so far

I have read about 1 hour and 10 minutes of this book and I can say it is one of the best books on God I have read so far, and it all makes sense.

To sum up what I've read:

-God is everything that is, and everything that is not. He is so all encompassing, that all that exists, and does not exist, is him. This is difficult to grasp if you aren't familiar with philosophy, but I'm sure most of you are.

-God was in a divine state of "knowing". He knew everything, but he longed to experience things. Therefore, he split himself up, into uncountably many pieces, us. We, all the living and dead things are him. He gave us all a piece of his soul, and we are literally him, and he is literally us, and we are all literally eachother.

-We, he, us, God, voluntarily forgot all that we know, in order to properly experience ourselves, and what we want of life. Everyone knows, buried deep in their soul, what it means to be a generous person, but knowing isn't enough. We yearn to experience. Life is not a school because there is nothing to learn. We know everything already. We are here to experience life, not learn it.

-Since we are all God, remember that everything done to you, and for you, is also done to and for the one that did it. Sins and blessings are done against and for eachother, and so there are no real villains or victims in this world. Only things that happen. Your judgement of whether these things are good or bad determines whether or not you are "mastering".

-The reason I made this thread today, is to remind you all that you are immortal souls, and literally, pieces, children of God. God will never forsake you, no matter how badly you sin or how much you hate yourself. God cannot and will not forsake you, for to do so, would be to forsake himself. God created love and fear, good and evil, virtue and sin, hot and cold, so that we may know the true meanings of good, love, virtue, etc.

There was once a soul who knew itself to be the light. This was a new soul, and so, anxious for experience. “I am the light,” it said. “I am the light.” Yet all the knowing of it and the all the saying of it could not substitute for the experience of it. For in the realm from which the this little soul emerged, there was nothing BUT the light. Every soul was magnificent, and shone with the brilliance of My awesome light. And so the little soul in question was as a candle in the sun. In the midst of the grandest light, of which it was a part, it could not see itself, nor experience itself as Who It Really Is. Now it came to pass that this soul yearned and yearned to know itself. And so great was its yearning that I one day said “Do you know, Little One, what you must do to satisfy this yearning of yours? You must separate yourself from the rest of us and then you must call upon yourself the darkness.” “What is the darkness, oh Holy One?” the little soul asked. “That which you are not.” I replied and the little soul understood. And so this the soul did, removing itself from all Yea, and going even unto another realm. And in this realm, the soul had the power to call into its experience all sorts of darkness. And this it did. And yet in the midst of all the darkness did it cry out, “Father, father, why have you forsaken me?” But I have never forsaken you, but stand by you always, ready to remind you of Who You Really Are, ready, always ready to call you home.